Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 267, 2019
2018 2nd AASRI International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISC 2018)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 5
Section Computer Science and Information Engineering
Published online 11 February 2019
  1. Adjekum D.K., Keller J., Walala M., Young J.P., Christensen C., DeMik R.J., Northam G.J. Cross-Sectional Assessment of Safety Culture Perceptions and Safety Behavior in Collegiate Aviation Programs in the United States. Int. J. Aviation. Aeron, 2(4) (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajzen, I. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. Theories of Cognitive Self-Regulation, 50(2), 179-211 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. (1986) [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen Y.G., Ren H.F. Application of gray Markov model in aviation incident prediction. J. Xian. U. Sci. Technol., 02 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. Compeau R.D., Higgins A.C. Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS. Quart., 19, 189-211 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS. Quart., 13, 319-340 (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 22(14), 1111-1132 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fishbein M., Ajzen I., Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, (1975) [Google Scholar]
  9. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing. Res., 18(1), 39-50 (1981) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hair F.H., Hult GTM, Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. Harizi R., Belhaiza M.A., Harizi B. A Cliometric Analysis of the Explanatory Factors of the Air Crashes in the World (1950-2008). J. Transp. Saf. Secur., 5(2), 165-185 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hulland J. Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies. John Strategic Mana. J., 20(2), 195-204 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  13. Li Y., Zhang X.Q. Application of Grey Correlation Analysis in Civil Aviation Incidents Management, Technology. Ec. Areas, 2011-03 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu L.L., Sun Y.F. Prediction Model of the Air Transport Incidents of Civil Aviation Based on Set Pair Analysis, Safety. Env. Eng., 2013-05 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Medina M.Q., Chaparro J.P., The impact of the human element in the information systems quality for decision making and user satisfaction. J. Comput. Inform. Syst., 48(2), 44-53 (2007/2008) [Google Scholar]
  16. Melone N.P. A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research, Manage. Sci., 36(1), 76-91 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Moore G.C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Syst. Res., 2, 192-222 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pavlou P.A., Fygenson, M. Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS. Quart., 30(1), 115-143 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pirouz D.M. An overview of partial least squares. The Paul Merage School of Business University of California, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramstad R., Rake O.N., Braut G.S., Incident Command and Information Flows in a Large-Scale Emergency Operation. J. Conting. Crisis. Man., 22(1), 29-38 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ringle C.M., Wende S., Will A. Smart PLS 2.0 M3. Hamburg: University of Hamburg., (2005) [Google Scholar]
  22. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations (3rd Ed.). New York: Free Press, (1983) [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor S., Todd P.A. Decomposition and Crossover Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions. Int. J. Res. Mark., 12(2), 137-155 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Taylor S., Todd P.A. Understanding Information Technology Usage: a Test of Competing Models. Inform. Syst. Res., 6(2), 144-176 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson R.L., Higgins C.A., Howell J.M. Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS. Quart., 15(1), 125-143 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Manage. Sci., 46(2), 186-204 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quart., 27(3), 425-478 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vine S.J., Uiga L., Lavric A., Moore L.J., Tsaneva-Atanasova K., Wilson M.R. Individual reactions to stress predict performance during a critical aviation incident. Anxiety. Stress. Copin., 28(4), 467-477 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wallace R.J. Effect of Cellular Phone and Radar Forensics on Search and Rescue Duration for General Aviation Aircraft Accidents in the Contiguous United States. J. Aviat. Technol. Eng., 3(2), Article 7 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang J., Rosca D., Tepfenhart W., Milewski A., Stoute M. Dynamic workflow modeling and analysis in incident command systems. IEEE. T. Syst. Man. Cy. A., 38(5), 1041-1055 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.