EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 266 (2019) MATEC Web Conf., 266 (2019) 05002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 266, 2019
International Conference on Built Environment and Engineering 2018 - “Enhancing Construction Industry Through IR4.0” (IConBEE2018)
Article Number 05002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Construction Technology (CT)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926605002
Published online 20 February 2019
  1. CIDB, “Construction Industry Transformation Programme (CITP) 2016-2020,” Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia. pp. 1-184, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Economic Planning Unit, “Eleventh Plan 2016-2020 Malaysia Anchoring Growth on People,” Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad. p. 262, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. K. Chew, “Evolution of Construction Industry: To the Trend of Technology Based Industry,” 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Wang and R. Han, “A review of Building Information Modelling,” in AIP Conference Proceedings 1967, 040058 (2018), 2018, pp. 1-4. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. King, “How Industry 4 . 0 and BIM are Shaping the Future of the Increasing Information in,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.gim-international.com/content/article/how-industry-4-0-and-bim-are-shaping-the-future-of-the-construction-environment. [Accessed: 12-May-2018]. [Google Scholar]
  6. CIDB, BIM GUIDE 1: Awareness. Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB), 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. A. Hamid et al., “Building Information Modelling (BIM) Stage 2 Implementation Strategy for the Construction Industry in Malaysia,” E-Construct Building Information Modelling Magazine, pp. 22-27, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. P. W. Iskandar, “Penggunaan Level 2 BIM menjelang 2019,” Berita Harian Online, Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  9. Construction Industry Development Board of Malaysia, “BIM report 2016.” pp. 1-43, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Ahmed, “Barriers to Implementation of Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) to the Construction Industry : A Review,” J. Civ. Eng. Constr., vol. 2, pp. 107–113, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. J. Grant and A. Booth, “A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies,” Health Info. Libr. J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 91-108, 2009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. E. T. Rother, “Systematic literature review X narrative review,” ACTA Paul. Enferm., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 7-8, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Azhar, M. Khalfan, and T. Maqsood, “Building information modelling (BIM): now and beyond,” Constr. Econ. Build., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 15-28, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modelling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Patil and P. M. Khandare, “Application of BIM for Scheduling and Costing of Construction Project,” pp. 1644-1647, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. S. Jayasena and C. Weddikkara, “Assessing the BIM Maturity in a BIM Infant Industry,” Second World Constr. Symp. 2013 Socio-Economic Sustain. Constr., no. June 2013, pp. 62-69, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Z. Sampaio and E. Berdeja, “Collaborative BIM environment as a support to conflict analysis in a building design,” pp. 77-82, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Lu, D. Zhang, and S. Rowlinson, “BIM Collaboration : a Conceptual Model and Its Characteristics,” Procs 29th Annu. ARCOM Conf., no. September, pp. 25-34, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Succar, “Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders,” Autom. Constr., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 357-375, May 2009. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Bataw, R. Kirkham, and E. Lou, “The Issues and Considerations Associated with BIM Integration,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 00005, pp. 1–8, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. A. Latiffi, S. Mohd, and J. Brahim, “Application of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the Malaysian Construction Industry: A Story of the First Government Project,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 773-774, no. MARCH, pp. 943-948, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Zainon, F. A. Mohd-rahim, and H. Salleh, “The rise of BIM in Malaysia and its impact towards quantity surveying practices,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 66, p. 00060, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ahmad Latiffi, J. Brahim, S. Mohd, and M. S. Fathi, “The Malaysian Government’s Initiative in Using Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) in Construction Projects,” in ASEA-SEC -2, Bangkok, 2014, no. November. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. N. Harun, S. A. Samad, M. N. M. Nawi, and N. A. Haron, “Existing Practices of Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) Implementation in the Public Sector,” Int. J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 166-177, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. T. Haron, A. J. Marshall-Ponting, Z. Zakaria, M. N. M. Nawi, Z. A. Hamid, and K. A. M. Kamar, “An industrial report on the Malaysian building information modelling (BIM) taskforce: Issues and recommendations,” Malaysian Constr. Res. J., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 21-36, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. F. Shapiai, “Managing BIM in Goverment Project [Presentation Slides].” Level 11, Sunway Putra Tower, Lot 100, Jalan Putra, 50350 Kuala Lumpur, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Croft and N. Ledger, “BIM promotes collaboration,” Constr. Law J., vol. 26 (5), no. June 2015, pp. 23-25, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  28. Q.J. Keat, “Issues in BIM for QS: Outcomes from the Quantity Surveyor (QS) Principals Dialogue,” RISM, no. 1, pp. 18-20, Jul-2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. H. Abd Jamil and M. S. Fathi, “Contractual challenges for BIM-based construction projects: a systematic review,” Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., p. BEPAM-12-2017-0131, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  30. C.-N. Bodea and A. Purnus, “Legal Implications of Building Information Modeling,” 2008. [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Nulton, “Analysis of legal concepts for projects implementing BIM in the US,” Pennsylvania State University, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  32. M. A. B. Chou-Duivis, “Some legal aspects of BIM in establishing a collaborative relationship,” in Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environmentc (MISBE 2011), CIB International Conference, Amsterdam, 2011, no. June. [Google Scholar]
  33. H. Ashcraft, “Building information modeling: A framework for collaboration,” BIM-legal, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1-14, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Alwash, P. E. D. Love, and O. Olatunji, “Impact and Remedy of Legal Uncertainties in Building Information Modeling,” J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 04517005, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. J. M. Dougherty, “Claims, Disputes and Litigations Involving BIM.” Routledge, pp. 103-126, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Manderson, M. Jefferies, and G. Brewer, “Building Information Modelling and Standardised Construction Contracts : a Content Analysis of the GC21 Contract Legal and Contractual Concerns with BIM Deployment,” Constr. Econ. Build., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 72-84, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Rajoo and H. S. KS, “Construction Law in Malaysia.” pp. 88-90, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  38. L. M. Pheng and I. J. Detta, “Business Law- Second Edition.” Oxford University Press, pp. 265-266, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  39. D. B. Arensman and M. E. Ozbek, “Building Information Modeling and Potential Legal Issues,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 146-156, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. O. A. Olatunji, “Views on building information modelling, procurement and contract management,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. - Manag. Procure. Law, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 117-126, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  41. T.-Y. Hsieh, J.-H. Chen, and K.-M. Hsu, “Legal risks incurred under the application of BIM in Taiwan,” Proc. ICE - Forensic Eng., vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 127-133, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  42. M. N. Mohd Nawi, N. Baluch, and A. Y. Bahauddin, “Impact of Fragmentation Issue in Construction Industry: An Overview,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 15, p. 01009, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. O. A. Olatunji, “A preliminary review on the legal implications of BIM and model ownership,” Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr., vol. 16, no. August 2010, pp. 687-696, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Chen, “BIM from a practical perspective,” no. March 2014, pp. 28-35, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ö. Onur, “Changing Role(S) of the Profession of Architecture: Building Information Modeling in Practice,” Middle East Technical University, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  46. F. Elliott, “The first reported UK BIM case: Trant v Mott MacDonald,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/annual-review/2017/uk-bim-trant-mott-macdonald. [Accessed: 15-Sep-2018]. [Google Scholar]
  47. I. Czmoch and A. Pękala, “Traditional design versus BIM based design,” Procedia Eng., vol. 91, no. TFoCE, pp. 210-215, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. E. Alreshidi, M. Mourshed, and Y. Rezgui, “Factors for effective BIM governance,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 10, no. February, pp. 89-101, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. A. Alwash, P. E. D. Love, D. Ph, D. Sc, O. Olatunji, and D. Ph, “Impact and Remedy of Legal Uncertainties in Building Information Modeling,” pp. 1-7, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  50. I. Kuiper and D. Holzer, “Rethinking the contractual context for Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Australian built environment industry,” Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1-17, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. D. Mosey et al., “Enabling BIM Through Procuremnt and Contracts,” 2016. [Google Scholar]
  52. H. Chong, S. Fan, M. Sutrisna, S. Hsieh, and C. Tsai, “Preliminary Contractual Framework for BIM-Enabled Projects,” 2014. [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Winfield and S. Rock, “The Winfield Rock Report. Overcoming the legal and contractual barriers of BIM,” no. 1, pp. 11-35, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  54. R. Sacks and U. Gurevich, “a Review of Building Information Modeling Protocols, Guides and Standards for Large Construction Clients,” J. Inf. Technol. Constr., vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 479-503, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.