EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 262 (2019) MATEC Web Conf., 262 (2019) 05009 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 262, 2019
64 Scientific Conference of the Committee for Civil Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences and the Science Committee of the Polish Association of Civil Engineers (PZITB) (KRYNICA 2018)
Article Number 05009
Number of page(s) 7
Section Transportation Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926205009
Published online 30 January 2019
  1. European Commission, Fact Sheet, 2017 road safety statistics: What is behind the figures?, Brussels(2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. European Union, Valletta Declaration on Road Safety, Valletta (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Olszewski, B. Osińska, A. Zielińska, Pedestrian safety at traffic signals in Warsaw, Transportation Research Procedia 14, p. 1174–1182 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Website of the project InDeV: http://www.indev-project.eu/InDeV/EN/Home/ home_node.html [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Elvik, Some difficulties in defining populations of “entities” for estimating the expected number of accidents, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 20, 4, p. 261–275 (1988) doi:10.1016/0001-4575 (88)900541 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Elvik, A. Høye, T. Vaa & M. Sørensen, The handbook of road safety measures, Bingley: Emerald (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Alsop & J. Langley, Under-reporting of motor vehicle traffic crash victims in New Zealand, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33, 3, p. 353–359 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00049-X [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Amoros, J.-L. Martin & B. Laumon, Under-reporting of road crash casualties in France, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38, 4, p. 627–635 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Elvik & A. Mysen, Incomplete accident reporting: Meta-analysis of studies made in 13 countries, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1665, 133– 140 (1999) doi:10.3141/1665-18 [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Olszewski, B. Osińska, P. Szagała, P. Skoczyński & A. Zielińska, Problems with assessing safety of vulnerable road users based on traffic accident data, Archives of Civil Engineering, 62, 4, p. 149–168 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. F.H. Amundsen & C. Hydén, First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo/Lund Institute of Technology. Oslo (1977) [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Hydén, The development of a method for traffic safety evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique, Doctoral Thesis, Lund University, Lund (1987) [Google Scholar]
  13. J.H. Kraay & A.R.A. van der Horst, The Trautenfels Study: A Diagnosis of Road Safety Using Dutch Conflict Observation Technique DOCTOR, Institute for Road Safety Research SWOV, The Netherlands, R-85–53 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Johnsson, A. Laureshyn & T. De Ceunynck, In search of surrogate safety indicators for vulnerable road users: a review of surrogate safety indicators, Transport Reviews (2018) DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2018.1442888 [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Kastrinaki, M. Zervakis & K. Kalaitzakis, A survey of video processing techniques for traffic applications. Image and Vision Computing, 21, p. 359–381 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Saunier & T. Sayed, Automated analysis of road safety with video data, Transportation Research Record, 2019, p. 57–64 (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2019-08 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Ismail, T. Sayed & N. Saunier, Automated safety analysis using video sensors: technology and case studies. Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference, Ontario, Canada (2010) [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Czajewski, P. Mrówka, P., & P. Olszewski, Video Processing for Detection and Tracking of Pedestrians and Vehicles at Zebra Crossings, International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics, p. 34–44, Springer, Cham (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Laureshyn, A. Svensson & C. Hydén, Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, p. 1637–1646 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Olszewski, I. Buttler, W. Czajewski, P. Dąbkowski, C. Kraśkiewicz, P. Szagała & A. Zielińska, Pedestrian safety assessment with video analysis, Transportation Research Procedia, 14, p. 2044–2053 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Laureshyn, T. De Ceunynck, C. Karlsson, Å. Svensson & S. Daniels, In search of the severity dimension of traffic events: Extended Delta-V as a traffic conflict indicator, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 98, p.46–56 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T.K.O. Madsen, RUBA -video analysis software for road user behaviour analysis, 29th ICTCT workshop. 20–21 October, Lund, Sweden (2016) [Google Scholar]
  23. T-Analyst Software for semi-automated video processing, www.tft.lth.se/software Acc. 04 Apr 2017 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Hayward, Near misses as a measure of safety at urban intersections, Doctoral Thesis, The Pensilvania State University, Department of Civil Engineering (1971) [Google Scholar]
  25. B. L. Allen, B. T. Shin, P. J. Cooper, Analysis of traffic conflicts and collisions, Transportation Research Record 667, p. 67–74 (1978) [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Wang,Y. Zhu, Y. Shen & Q. Liu, Traffic Conflict Detection of Vehicle and Non-motorized Vehicle at Intersection Based on Deep Learning, Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, 7–11 January, Washington D.C., USA (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.