Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2019
International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials (SCESCM 2018)
Article Number 05018
Number of page(s) 8
Section Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Structures in Severe Environment, Structural Analysis
Published online 25 January 2019
  1. Ministry of Construction, Stipulation of criteria with respect to structural calculations performed to confirm the safety from the point of view of structural capacity of wooden columns. Building Standard Law of Japan Notification No. 1349, May 23, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fauzan, H. Kuramoto, and K.H. Kim, “Seismic performance of composite EWECS columns using single H-steel”, Proceeding of JCI 27(2), 2005, pp. 307–312. [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Kuramoto, and Fauzan, “Feasibility study on engineering wood encased concrete-steel composite columns”, Proceeding 11th Int. Colloquium on Structural and Geotechnical Engineering (11th ICSGE), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. ANSYS Version 14. 2010. User’s and theory reference manual. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. M. A. Kadhim, “Nonlinear FE analysis of reinforced H.S. concrete continuous beam strengthened with CFRP sheet”, Proceeding of the International Conference on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 2011, pp. 597–601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. K. Hassan, M. F. M. Zain, and M. Jamil, “Finite element analysis of the effect of crack depth and crack opening on the girder”, Proceeding of the International Conference on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 2011, pp. 646–651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. L. P. Saenz, “Discussion of equation for the stress-strain curve for concrete” Journal American Concrete Institute, vol. 61(9), pp. 1229–1235, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  8. R. S. H. Al-Mahaidi, “Nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete deep members”, Rep. No. 79(1), Department of Structural Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 1979. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. L. Willam, and E. P. Warnke, “Constitutive model for the triaxial behavior of concrete”, Proc. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), vol. 19, Zurich, Switzerland, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Kuramoto, B. Li, K. Meas, and Fauzan, “Experimental and analytical performance evaluation of engineering wood encased concrete-steel beam-column joints”, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, pp. 822–833, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Leskes, and S. Grambicka, “Theoretical and experimental studies on composite steel-concrete columns”, Proc. Eng. Science direct, vol. 65, 2013, pp. 405–410. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fauzan, and H. Kuramoto, “Seismic performance of EWECS composite columns in new hybrid structural system”, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete, vol. 6, pp. 263–275, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. R. Abbas, “Nonlinear finite element analysis to the circular CFST stub columns”, 11th Int. Symposium on Plasticity and Impact Mechanics, Procedia Engineering, vol. 173, pp.1692–1699, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. A. Hawileh, A. Rahman, and H. Tabatabai, “Nonlinier finite element analysis and modelling of a precast hybrid beam-column connection subjected to cyclic loads”, Journal Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 34, pp. 2562–2583, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Marcela, and L. Ana, “Parametric study of composite beam-column connections using 3D finite element modeling”, Journal Construction Steel Research, vol. 102, pp. 136–149, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fauzan, Febrin A. I., Rio S., Nurhasan S., and Anisa P. M., “The effects of steel fibers extracted from waste tyre on concrete containing palm oil fuel ash”, International Journal of GEOMATE, vol. 14(44), pp. 142–148, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.