EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 258 (2019) MATEC Web Conf., 258 (2019) 03011 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2019
International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials (SCESCM 2018)
Article Number 03011
Number of page(s) 10
Section Forensic Engineering, Structural Health Monitoring System, Assessment and Retrofitting, Disaster Mitigation and Restoration
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925803011
Published online 25 January 2019
  1. AIA. (2001). Guide to Historic Preservation. The American Institute of Architect [Google Scholar]
  2. Atillah, A., Hadani, D. El., Moudni, H., Lesne, O., Renou, C., Mangin, A., and Rouffi, F. (2011). Tsunami vulnerability and damage assessment in the coastal area of Rabat and Sal’e, Morocco. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences. Vol. 11, pp. 3397–3414. Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arkedani, A and Hosseini, M. (2012). Urban and Architectural Approaches to Design Against Tsunami. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE). Lisboa. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barros, J. L., Emidio, A., Santos, A., and Tavares, A. O. (2015). Composite methodology for tsunami vulnerability assessment based on the numerical simulation of 1755 Lisbon tsunami-application on two Portuguese coastal areas. In Nowakowski, T. et al. (Eds). Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications. pp. 1581. London: Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, I. (1999). Building Preservation Knowledge in Brazil. Washington, D.C. Council on Library and Information Resources. [Google Scholar]
  6. Benazir, Triatmadja, R., Yuwono, N., Nurhasanah, A., and Kuswandi. (2013). Tsunami Force on Low Building and the Effect of Surrounding Buildings. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Asian and Pacific Coasts (APAC 2013), September 24-26. Bali, Indonesia. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bendaoui, Kh., Hammoumi, A. El., Gueraoui, K., Kerroum, M., Elghachi, M., Ghouli, A., Cherraj, M., Brahim, A. I., Mouraouah, A. E., (2010). The vulnerability of Buildings for a Tsunami. International Review of Mechanical Engineering (I.REM.E.). Vol. 4, No. 5. Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. [Google Scholar]
  8. Boen, T. (2005). Sumatra Earthquake 26 Dec 2004. https://www.eeri.org. [Google Scholar]
  9. Budiarjo, A. (2006). Evacuation Shelter Building Planning for Tsunami-prone Area; a Case Study of Meulaboh City, Indonesia. Master of Science, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dall’Osso, F., Gonella, M., Gabbianelli, G., Withycombe, G., and Dominey-Howes., D. (2009). A revised (PTVA) model for assessing the vulnerability of buildings to tsunami damage. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences. Vol. 9, pp. 1557–1565. Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dall’osso, F., Gonella, M., Gabbianelli, G., Withycombe, G., and DomineyHowes, D. (2009). Assessing the vulnerability of buildings to tsunami in Sydney. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences. Vol. 9, pp. 2015–2026. Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dalrymple, R. A., and Kriebel, D. L. (2005). Lessons in Engineering from the Tsunami in Thailand. The Bridge. Vol 35, Number 2, pp 4–13. National Academy Of Engineering. [Google Scholar]
  13. Diposaptono, S and Budiman. (2006). Tsunami. Buku Ilmiah Populer. Bogor. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dominey-Howes, D., and Papathoma, M. (2007). Validating a Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment Model (the PTVA Model) Using Field Data from the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Natural Hazards. Vol. 40, pp 113–136. Springer Netherlands. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghobarah, A., Saatcioglu, M., and Nistor, I. (2006). The impact of the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami on structures and infrastructure. Engineering Structures, Vol. 28, pp 312–326. Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hajar, M. (2006). Pemetaan Tingkat Kerawanan Bencana Tsunami Menggunakan Data Pengindraan Jauh dan Sistem Informasi Geografi (SIG) Studi Kasus: Kota Padang. Minithesis. Marine Science and Technology Department, Bogor Agricultural University. [Google Scholar]
  17. Honesti, L., Majid, M. Z. A., Muchlian, M., and Djali., N. (2014). Assessing Building Vulnerability to Tsunami Hazard in Padang. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering). Vol. 69:6, pp 5–9. UTM Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Honesti, L., Majid, M. Z. A., Djali., N., and Muchlian, M. (2015). Modeling the Potential Risk of Building Vulnerability toward Tsunami Hazard in Ulak Karang and Pasir Jambak Sub-District, Padang. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering). Vol. 72:4, pp 41–47. UTM Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Indonesia. (2002). Keputusan Menteri Permukiman dan Prasarana Wilayah tentang Pedoman teknis Pembangunan Gedung Negara. No.332/KPTS/M/2002. [Google Scholar]
  20. Indonesia. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum tentang Pedoman Teknis Pembangunan Bangunan Gedung Negara. No: 45/PRT/M/2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum tentang Pedoman Pemeliharaan dan Perawatan Bangunan Gedung. 24/PRT/M/2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. Iswanto, A. H. (2008). Audit Konstruksi Bangunan. Departemen Kehutanan Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Sumatera Utara. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jelinek, R. Eckert, S., Zeug, G., and Krausmann, E. (2009). Tsunami Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Applied to the City of Alexandria, Egypt. Italy: European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  24. JICA, (2005). The Study on the Urgent Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Support Program for Aceh Province and Affected Areas in North Sumatra. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas), and Provincial Government of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, Banda Aceh. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kathiresan, K. and Rajendran, N. (2005). Coastal mangrove forests mitigated tsunami. Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 6. pp 601–606. Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Khasanah, L. U., Suwarsito,. Sarjanti, E. (2014). Tingkat Kerawanan Bencana Tsunami Kawasan Pantai Selatan Kabupaten Cilacap. Geoedukasi. Vol. III. No. 2. pp 77–82. Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kikuchi, K., Hanazato, T., Kuroki, M., Koga, K., Kawakami, K., and Mita, N. (2012). Results of First Reconnaissance on Damage to Reinforced Masonry Buildings and Garden Walls Caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. March 1-4. Tokyo, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuwata, Y., & Takada, S. (2004). Effective emergency transportation for saving human lives. Natural Hazards, Vol. 33, 23–46. Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lekkas, E. L., Andreadakis, E., Kostaki, I., and Kapourani, E. (2013). A Proposal for a New Integrated Tsunami Intensity Scale (ITIS-2012). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. Vol. 103, No. 2B, pp. 1493–1502. Seismological Society of America. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsutomi, H., Sakakiyama, T., Nugroho, S., and Matsuyama, M. (2006). Aspects of in inundated flow due to the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Coastal Engineering Journal. Vol. 48, Issue 2, pp 167–195. World Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Matsutomi, H., Okamoto, K., Harada, K. (2010). Inundation Flow Velocity of Tsunami on Land and its Practical Use. Proceedings of 32nd Conference on Coastal Engineering, Shanghai, China, No 32. [Google Scholar]
  32. Musa, Z. N., Popescu, I., Mynett, A (2014). The Niger Delta’s vulnerability to river floods due to sea level rise. Nat. Hazard Earth Syst. Sc., 14, 3317–3329 2014 www.at-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/14/3317/2014/doi:10.5194/nhess-14-3317-2014©Author(s) 2014.CCAttribution 3.0Licence. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Najihah, R., Effendi, D. M., Hairunnisa, M. A., and Masiri, K. (2014). Tsunami vulnerability assessment mapping for the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia using a geographical information system (GIS). Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 18. IOP Science. [Google Scholar]
  34. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program. (2001). Designing for Tsunamis: Seven Principles for Planning and Designing for Tsunami Hazards. [Google Scholar]
  35. National Tsunami National Disaster Management Division Ministry of Home Affairs Government of India.(2006). Protection and Mitigation from Risk of Tsunami: a Strategy Paper. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pambudi, Y.S.S. (2014). Kerentanan Bangunan Hunian Pada Wilayah Zona Potensi Bencana Tsunami Di Kecamatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Swara Bhumi. Vol 3, No 3. http://eiournal.unesa.ac.id [Google Scholar]
  37. Papathoma, M., and Dominey-Howes, D. (2003). Tsunami vulnerability assessment and its implications for coastal hazard analysis and disaster management planning, Gulf of Corinth, Greece. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. Vol. 3, pp 733–747. European Geosciences Union. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Putra, R. R., Kiyono, J., and Ono, Y. (2012). Shaking Characteristic of Padang City, Indonesia. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE). Lisboa. [Google Scholar]
  39. Raskin, J., Wang, Y., Boyer, M.M., Fiez, T., Moncada, J., Yu, K., and Yeh, H. (2009). Preliminary White Paper on Tsunami Evacuation Buildings (TEBs): A New Risk Management Approach to Cascadia Earthquakes and Tsunamis. CBTEB 3-20-09 version.pdf [Google Scholar]
  40. Reese, S., Cousins, W. J., Power, W. L., Palmer, N. G., Tejakusuma, I. G., and Nugrahadi, S. (2007). Tsunami vulnerability of buildings and people in South Java - field observation after the July 2006 Java tsunami. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences. Vol. 7, pp 573–589. Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rossetto, T., Peiris, N., Alarcon, JE., So, E., Sargeant, S., Free, M., and Sword-Daniels, V. (2009). The L’Aquila, Italy Earthquake of 6 April 2009. EEFIT Preliminary Field Report. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sandink, D. (2009). Handbook for reducing Basement flooding. Canada: ICLR (Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction). [Google Scholar]
  43. Sever, M., Vanholder, R., & Lameire, N. (2006). Management of crash-related injuries after disasters. New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 254, pp 1052–1063. http://www.nejm.org/ [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sivakumar, I., and Sivagamasundari, R. (2015). A Statistical Model for Assessing Building Vulnerability to Tsunami In Coastal Region. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (BHRC). Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 547–555. Building and Housing Research Center. [Google Scholar]
  45. Slotta-Bachmayr, L. (2005). How burial time of avalanche victims is influenced by rescue method: An analysis of search reports from the Alps. Natural Hazards, Vol. 34, pp. 341–352. Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sumaryono. (2010). Assessing Building Vulnerability to Tsunami Hazard Using Integrative Remote Sensing and GIS Approaches. Dissertation Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. [Google Scholar]
  47. UNEP-SBCI. (2007). After the Tsunami: Sustainable building guidelines for South-East Asia, United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  48. UNESCO/IOC. (2012). A Guide to Tsunamis for Hotels: Tsunami Evacuation Procedures. http://neamtic.ioc-unesco.org/ [Google Scholar]
  49. UNISDR. (2007). Handbook on Good Building Design and Construction Aceh and Nias Islands. United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  50. Warnitchai, P. (2005). Lessons Learned from the 26 December 2004 Tsunami Disaster in Thailand. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia. Singapore, 18-19 October. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilson, S., McCloy, A., and Dea, A. O. (2013). Review of drainage and flooding implications of basement extensions in RBKC. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yudichara, 2008. Kaitan antara Karakteristika Pantai Propinsi Sumatera Barat dengan Potensi Kerawanan Tsunam. Jurnal Geologi Indonesia 3: 95–106 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.