EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 258 (2019) MATEC Web Conf., 258 (2019) 02006 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2019
International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials (SCESCM 2018)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 8
Section Construction Management, Construction Method and System, Optimization and Innovation in Structural Design
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925802006
Published online 25 January 2019
  1. M. Hein, B. Sketo S. Azhar, Building information modelling (BIM): benefits, risks and challenges,(2008). [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Eadie, M. Browne, H. Odeyinka, C. McKeown, and S. McNiff, BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle, Automation in Construction, 145–151, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. K. Lee, K. R. Kim, and J. H. Yu, BIM and ontology-based approach for building cost estimation, Automation in Construction, 96–105, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhabrinna, The Evaluation of the Readiness of Indonesia in Adopting BIM and the Strategic Improvement by Benchmarking the Best Practice of BIM Implementation in the UK, Birmingham, MSc Dissertation (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. J. P. Martins and A. Monteiro, LicA: A BIM based automated code-checking application for water, Automation in Construction, 12–23, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Bryde, M. Broquetas, and J. M. Volm, The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM), International Journal of Project Management, 971–980, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Solihin and C. Eastman, Classification of rules for automated BIM rule checking development, Automation in Construction, 69–82, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. A. Liang, Kajian Terhadap Praktik Building Information Modelling pada Industri Konstruksi di Indonesia, Yogyakarta, (2015). [in Indonesian] [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Hanifah, Awareness dan Pemanfaatan BIM : Studi Eksplorasi, in Temu Ilmiah IPLBI 2016, Bandung, (2016). [in Indonesian] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Firdaus, Investigating the Mitigation of Delays in Indonesian Construction Projects Using IT Tools and Techniques, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Dissertation (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Eastman, What is BIM?, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  12. P.E.D. Love, J. Matthews, I. Simpson, A. Hill, and O. A. Olatunji, A benefits realization management building information modelling framework for asset owners, Automation in Construction, 1–10, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P.E.D. Love, I. Simpson, A. Hill, and C. Standing, From justification to evaluation: building information modelling for asset owners, Automation in Construction 35, 208–216, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. V. Singh, N. Gu, and X. Wang, A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform, Automation in Construction, 134–144, (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Smith, BIM Implementation - Global Strategies, Procedia Engineering, 482–492, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. National BIM standard - United States, National Building Information Model Standart Project Committee, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  17. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore BIM Guide Version 2, Singapore, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Smith, An Introduction to Building Information Modelling (BIM), Journal of Building Information Modelling, 4–12, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Migilinskasa, V. Popovb, V. Juoceviciusc, and L. Ustinovichius, The Benefits, Obstacles and Problems of Practical BIM Implementation, Procedia Engineering, 767–774, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. I. Motawa and A. Almarshad, A knowledge- based BIM system for building maintenance, Automation in Construction, 29, 173–182, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Sulankivi J. Nummelin, M. Kiviniemi, and T. Koppinen, Managing Building Information and client requirements in construction supply chain - contractor’s view, in CIB W078-W102 joint conference, Sophia Antipolis, 78–102, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  22. X. Liu and B. Akinci, Requirements and Evaluation of Standards for Integration of Sensor Data with Building Information Models. Caldas: O’Brien, William J., (2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Cao et al., Practices and effectiveness of building information modelling in construction projects in China, Automation in Construction, 113–122, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Jin, C. M. Hancock, L. Tang, and D. Wanatowski, BIM Investment, Returns, and Risks in China’s AEC Industries, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  25. C. S. Park, D. Y. Lee, O. S. Kwon, and X. Wang, A framework for proactive construction defect management using BIM, augmented reality and ontology-based data collection template, Automation in Construction, 22, 61–71, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Zhang, J. Teizer, J. K. Lee, C. M. Eastman, and M. Venugopal, Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Safety: Automatic Safety Checking of Construction Models and Schedules, Automation in Construction, 29, 183–195, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Porwal and K. N. Hewage, Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects, Automation in Construction, 31, 204–214, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. J.H.M. Tah, A.H. Oti, and F.H. Abanda, A state-of-the-art review of built environment information modelling (BeIM), Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 9, 1638–1654, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Teicholz, P. Sacks, R. Liston, K. Eastman, BIM Handbook: a Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. New York: John Wiley & Sons, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  30. NBS, National BIM Report 2017,(2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.