Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 221, 2018
2018 3rd International Conference on Design and Manufacturing Engineering (ICDME 2018)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 4
Section Functional Material Design and Analysis
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822101009
Published online 29 October 2018
  1. Cao X, Wanjara P, Huang J, et al. 2011. Mater. Des. 32(6):3399–3413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sterjovski Z, Dunne D, Ambrose S. 2004. Int J Press Vessel Pip 81(6):465–470. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Min D, Xin-hua T, Feng-gui L, Shun Y. 2011. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 55(5–8):527–533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim M-C, Park S-G, Lee K-H, Ho Kim S, Lee B-S. 2014. Curr Nanosci. 10(1):151–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu W H, Lin S B, Fan C L, et al. 2014. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75(9-12):1439–1446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Viano D, Ahmed N, Schumann G. 2000. Sci Technol Weld Join. 5(1):26–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang C, Yang J, Hu X, Lu P, Zhao M. 2012. Mater Sci Eng A. 546:169–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mohandas T, Madhusudan Reddy G, Satish Kumar B. 1999. J Mater Process Technol. 88(1):284–294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Prasad K, Dwivedi D. 2008. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 36(5–6):475–483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Umekuni A and Masubuchi K. 1997 Weld. J. 76(7): 256s. [Google Scholar]
  11. Loureiro and A. J 2002 J. Mater. Process. Tech. 128(1-3), 240–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rakin, M., Medjo, B., Gubeljak, N. and Sedmak, A 2013 Eng. Fract. Mech. 109, 221235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhu, L. and Tao, X. Y. 2016 Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip. 139, 61–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eurocode 3-Design of steel structures, Part 1. 8 Joints, EN 1993-1-8. [Google Scholar]
  15. American Bureau of Shipping. Commentary on the guide for the fatigue assessment of offshore structures; January 2004–updated 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. BS5400, P. 10, 1980, Code of Practice for Fatigue. Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges. British Standard Institution. [Google Scholar]
  17. Eurocode 3-Design of steel structures, Part 1. 8 Joints, EN 1993-1–8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zamzami I A, Susmel L. 2016. Int. J. Fatigue. 101. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hobbacher A. 2015. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chandran, K. R. 2017. Int. J. Fatigue. 102: 261–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chandran, K. R. 2015. Scripta Mater. 2015; 107: 115–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Meggiolaro, M. A., & Castro, J. T. P. 2004. Int. J. Fatigue. 26(5): 463–476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Brennan, F. P. 1994. Int. J. Fatigue. 16(5): 351–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paris, P. C., Gomez, M. P., & Anderson, W. E. 1961. Trend in Engineering. 13. [Google Scholar]
  25. Paris, P. C. 1963. Trans.asme Ser.d. 85(4): 528–533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Suresh, S. 1998. Cambridge university press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Castillo, Enrique, and A. Fernández-Canteli. 2009. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kabir A S H, Cao X, Gholipour J, et al. 2012. Metall. Mater. Trans. A-Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 43(11):4171–4184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shen J J, Liu H J, Cui F. 2010. Mater. Des. 31(8):3937–3942. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao Y Y, Zhang Y S, Hu W. E. 2013. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 18(7):581–590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li P, Dong H, Xia Y, et al. 2018. J. Manuf. Process. 33:54–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mao Y, Ke L, Chen Y, et al. 2018. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 34(1). [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen J, Wei Y, Zhan X, et al. 2017. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 92(2):1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Magnabosco I, Ferro P, Bonollo F, et al. 2006. Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. 424(1-2): 163–173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu H, Fujii H, Maeda M, et al. 2003. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 22(6): 441–444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Standard A. 2007. Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue tests of metallic materials. 3. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.