Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 203, 2018
International Conference on Civil, Offshore & Environmental Engineering 2018 (ICCOEE 2018)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04007 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Geotechnical Engineering | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201820304007 | |
| Published online | 17 September 2018 | |
- Bagherbandi, M., Deformation monitoring using different least squares adjustment methods: A simulated study. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(2), pp.855-862, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cross, P.A, 1983. Advanced least squares applied to position-fixing. North East London Polytechnic, Department of Land Surveying. Working paper no.6: 205pp. [Google Scholar]
- Cross, P.A., 1981. Computer aided design of geodetic networks. Proceedings of VI International Symposium on Geodetic Computations, Munich 12pp. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, E., Wright, C., Demetrius, S., Choi, J. and Craley, G., Precise tiltmeter subsidence monitoring enhances reservoir management. In SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers., January 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Dudley, J.W., van der Linden, A. and Mah, K.G. Predicting accelerating subsidence above the highly compacted Luconia carbonate reservoirs, offshore Sarawak Malaysia. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering., 12(01), pp 104-115, February 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fujita, M., Ishikawa, T., Mochizuki, M., Sato, M., Toyama, S.I., Katayama, M., Kawai, K., Matsumoto, Y., Yabuki, T., Asada, A. and Colombo, O.L., GPS/Acoustic seafloor geodetic observation: method of data analysis and its application. Earth, planets and space, 58(3), pp.265-275, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hatchell, P., de Vries, R., Gee, V., Cousson, H., Lopez, J., Dunn, S., Street, N., Parsons, A., Cheramie, J. and Fischer, E., October. Seafloor deformation monitoring: Past, present, and future. In 2017 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 2017, pp. 5233-5238. [Google Scholar]
- Kutoglu, H.S. and Berber, M., Optimal number of reference points in deformation monitoring. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 50(4), 2015, pp.437-447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Miandro, R., Dacome, C., Mosconi, A. and Roncari, G., An Innovative Approach for Offshore Subsidence Monitoring: Technology Scouting, Feasibility Studies and Realization. In Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition. Offshore Mediterranean Conference, May 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Naankeu-Wati, G., Geldof, J.B. and Seube, N., Error Budget Analysis for surface and underwater survey system. The International Hydrographic Review, (15)., 2017, pp. 21-46. [Google Scholar]
- Sahabi, H., M. A. Rajabi, and J. A. R. Blais. Optimal Design of Deformation Monitoring Networks Using Genetic Algorithm. Oral presentation at the Fifth International Symposium Turkish-German Joint Geodetic Days in Berlin, Germany. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Rayson, M.W. Optimal design of survey networks for monitoring earthquake prediction. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Newcastle. 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Rayson, M.W. and Cross, P.A. Computer Aided Design of optimal networks for monitoring crustal tectonic activity. P. Vyskocil et al. (eds.), Global and Regional Geodynamics. Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990, pp 262-275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Report 373-07-2. Coordinate conversions and transformations including formulas. IOGP Guidance Note. 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Vilaseca, G., Deplus, C., Escartín, J., Ballu, V., Nomikou, P., Mével, C. and Andreani, M., Oceanographic Signatures and Pressure Monitoring of Seafloor Vertical Deformation in Near-coastal, Shallow Water Areas: A Case Study from Santorini Caldera. Marine Geodesy, 39(6), 2016, pp.401-421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.