Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 200, 2018
International Workshop on Transportation and Supply Chain Engineering (IWTSCE’18)
Article Number 00022
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 14 September 2018
  1. Ferreira, Aldónio, and David Otley. “The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis.” Management accounting research 20.4 (2009): 263–282. [Google Scholar]
  2. Taylor, Jeannette. “Organizational culture and the paradox of performance management.” Public Performance & Management Review 38.1 (2014): 7–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Martinez, Elizabeth A., et al. “Organizational culture and performance.” American Economic Review 105.5 (2015): 331–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guiso, Luigi, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales. “The value of corporate culture.” Journal of Financial Economics 117.1 (2015): 60–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Youngbantao, Unchan, and Nopadol Rompho. “The Uses of Measures in Performance Prism in Different Organizational Cultures.” Journal of Accounting and Finance 15.6 (2015): 122. [Google Scholar]
  6. Otley, David “Performance management: a framework for management control systems research.” Management accounting research 10.4 (1999): 363–382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Anthony, R.N. “Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.” Studies in Management Control (1965). [Google Scholar]
  8. Broadbent, Jane, and Richard Laughlin. “Performance management systems: a conceptual model and analysis of the development and intensification of ‘new public management’ in the UK.” APIRA Conference, Auckland. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Broadbent, Jane, and Richard Laughlin. “Performance management systems: A conceptual model.” Management Accounting Research 20.4 (2009): 283–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferreira, Aldónio, and David Otley. “The design and use of management control systems: an extended framework for analysis.” AAA Management Accounting Section 2006 Meeting Paper (2005). [Google Scholar]
  11. ICAO. “Manual on Global Performance of Air Navigation System (ICAO Doc 9883).” 1st ed. (2009). [Google Scholar]
  12. ICAO. “EUR Region Performance Framework Document (ICAO EUR Doc 030)” (2013). [Google Scholar]
  13. European Union. “COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) N° 390/2013, laying down a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions.” Official Journal of the European Union L128 (2013): 1. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hogan, Suellen J., and Leonard V. Coote. “Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model.” Journal of Business Research 67.8 (2014): 1609–1621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. O’Reilly, Charles A., and Jennifer A. Chatman. “Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment.” In: B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press 18 (1996): 157–200. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schein, Edgar H. “Organizational Culture and Leadership.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (1985). [Google Scholar]
  17. Atkinson, Anthony A., John H. Waterhouse, and Robert B. Wells. “A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement.” MIT Sloan Management Review 38.3 (1997): 25. [Google Scholar]
  18. Behn, Robert D. “Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures.” Public administration review 63.5 (2003): 586–606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. EUROCONTROL. “Safety culture: an overview.” (2008). [Google Scholar]
  20. Mwaura, N. E., and H. Bula. “Organizational Culture and Firm Performance: A case of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Kenya.” International Journal of Business, Social Sciences and Education (2017): 74–105. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.