EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 200 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 200 (2018) 00021 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 200, 2018
International Workshop on Transportation and Supply Chain Engineering (IWTSCE’18)
Article Number 00021
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201820000021
Published online 14 September 2018
  1. J. Oña, R. Oña, Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: A review and assessment of methodological approaches, Transportation Science, 49 (3), pp. 605–622. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. T.k. Ojo, Quality of public transport service: An integrative review and research agenda, Transport Letters, pp.1–14, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Sheth, K. Triantis, D. Teodorovic, Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43 (4), pp. 453–478, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  4. D.A. Abreha, Analysing Public Transport Performance Using Efficiency Measures and Spatial Analysis: the case of Adis Ababa-Ethiopia, Ms Thesis. International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Zhang, Z. Juan, Q. Luo, G. Xiao, Performance evaluation of public transit systems using a combined evaluation method, Transport Policy, 45, pp 156–167, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Xin, Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Transit System Efficiency and Incentive-based Subsidy Allocation, Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1064, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Borger, K. Kerstens, A. Costa, Public transit performance: What does one learn from frontier studies?, Transport Reviews, 22(1), pp.138, (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Jarboui, P. Forget, Y. Boujelbene, Public road transport efficiency: a literature review via the classification scheme, Public Transport, 4(2), pp.101–128. (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Daraio, M. Diana, F.D. Costa, C. Leporelli, G. Matteucci, A. Nastasi, Efficiency and effectiveness in the urban public transport sector: A critical review with directions for future research, European Journal of Operational Research, 248 (1), pp.1–20. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W.K. Talley. P.P. Anderson, Effectiveness and efficiency in transit performance: A theoretical perspective, Transportation Research Part A: General, 15 (6), pp. 431–436. (1981). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Chu, G.J. Fielding, B.W. Lamar, Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 26 (3), pp. 223–230, (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G.J. Fielding, T.T. Babitsky, M.E. Brenner, Performance evaluation for bus transit, Transportation Research Part A: General, 19 (1), pp. 73–82. (1985(a)). [Google Scholar]
  13. M.M. Yu, L.H. Chen, Assessment of Transportation Performance: A Network Structure. In: Zhu J. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol 238. Springer, Boston, MA. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. P.W. Bauer, Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers, Journal of Econometrics, 46 (1/2), pp. 39–56, (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M.E. Chaffai, Estimation de frontières d’efficience: un survol des développements récents de la littérature, Revue d’économie du développement, 5 (3), pp. 33–67, (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. L.R. Murillo-Zamorano, Economic efficiency and frontier techniques, Journal of Economic Surveys, 18 (1), pp. 33–77, (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T.J. Coelli, D.S.P. Rao, C.J. O’Donnell, G.E. Battese, A introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, Springer-Verlag New York Inc, 2nd ed. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Zhu, Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with Spreadsheet, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 213. Springer International Publishing, Edition N° 3. (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D.J. Aigner, C.A.K. Lovell, P.J. Schmidt, Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), pp.21–37, (1977). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Meeusen, J. Van den Broeck, Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error, International economic review, 18, pp. 435444. (1977). [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Charnes, W.W Cooper, F. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), pp.29–44, (1978). [Google Scholar]
  22. R.D. Banker, A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, 30 (9), pp. 1078–1092, (1984). [Google Scholar]
  23. D.T. Barnum, S. Tandon, S. McNeil, comparing the Performance of Bus Routes after Adjusting for the Environment Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 134(2), pp. 77–85, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Lin, P. Wang, D.T. Barnum, A quality control framework for bus schedule reliability, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44 (6), pp. 1086–108, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Hahn, H. Kim, S. Kho, A DEA Approach for Evaluating the Efficiency of Exclusive Bus Routes, Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 7, pp.227, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. Lao, L. Liu, Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(4), pp. 247–255, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. G.P. Michaelides, A. Belegri-Roboli, T. Marinos, Evaluating the Technical Efficiency of Trolley Buses in Athens, Greece, Journal of Public Transportation, 13(4), pp. 93–109, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Gebeyehu, S. Takano, evaluation of bus routes performance in the city of addis ababa using stochastic frontier model, Infrastructure Planning Review, 24 (3), pp.447–457, (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Hahn, H. Kim, S. Kho, Analysis of the efficiency of Seoul Arterial Bus routes and its determinant factors, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(6), pp. 1115–1123, (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. Chiou, L.W. Lan, T.H.Y. Barbara, Route-based data envelopment analysis models, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(2), pp. 415–425, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Yaser, B. Nandita, Evaluating and Enhancing the Operational Performance of Public Bus Systems Using GIS-based Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Public Transportation, 15(2), pp.19–44, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Li, X. Chen, X. Li, X. Guo, Evaluation of Public Transportation Operation based on Data Envelopment Analysis, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96, pp. 148–155, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Georgios, P. Ioannis, P. Panagiotis, Measuring and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of bus public transport systems, Research in Transportation Economics, 48, pp.84–91, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. V. Roháčová, A DEA based approach for optimization of urban public transport system Central European Journal of Operations Research, 23 (1), pp.215–233, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Güner, E. Coşkun, Determining the best performing benchmarks for transit routes with a multi-objective model: the implementation and a critique of the two-model approach, Public Transport, 8(2), pp 205–224, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Tran, A. Bhaskar, J. Bunker, B. Lee, Data envelopment analysis (DEA) based transit route temporal performance assessment: a pilot study proceedings of 38th Australasian Transport Research Forum, 16–18 November, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Bandyopadhayay, A. Banerjee, N. Abidi, Measuring Routes Efficiency of Kolkata Bus Transport: A Modified DEA Approach, Annals of Data Science, 3(3), (2016). [Google Scholar]
  38. D.J Sun, S. Chen, C. Zhang, S. Shen., A bus route evaluation model based on GIS and super-efficient data envelopment analysis. Transportation Planning and Technology, 39 (4), pp.407–423, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. W. Zhu, X. Yang, J. Preston, Efficiency measurement of bus routes and exogenous operating environment effects on efficiency, Transportation Planning and Technology, 39 (5), pp. 464–483, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. K. Tran, A. Bhaskar, J. Bunker, B. Lee, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) based transit routes performance evaluation, In Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting (TRB), Washington D.C, 8–12 January, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  41. K. Zhang, Y. Xu, J. Sun, A mixed frontier model for urban bus performance evaluation, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Transport, 171 (2), pp. 65–74, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  42. R. Wei, X. Liu, Y. Mu, L. Wang, A. Golub, S. Farber, Evaluating public transit services for operational efficiency and access equity, Journal of Transport Geography, 65, pp. 70–79, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. G. Samet, E. Coskun, Estimating the operational and service efficiency of bus transit routes using a non-radial DEA approach, EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, pp. 1–20, (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.