Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 195, 2018
The 4th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering (ICRMCE 2018)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 10
Section Transportation Engineering
Published online 22 August 2018
  1. H.K. Al-Abdul Wahhab, I.M. Asi, I.A. Dubabe and M.F. Ali, Development of performance-based bitumen specifications for the Gulf countries, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 11, pp. 15-22 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Bissada, Asphalt Pavement Temperature Related to Kuwait Climate, HRR 404, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., pp. 71-85 (1972). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Cope. Performance and Economic Benefits of Paving with Asphalt Rubber; Rubber Asphalt Foundation (1985). [Google Scholar]
  4. Sacramento County Department of Environmental Review and Assessment, Report on the Status of Rubberized Asphalt-Traffic Noise Reduction in Sacramento County, Nov. (1999). [Google Scholar]
  5. J. D’Angelo, Rubberized Asphalt Foundation Study Concludes Recycled Tire Rubber Can Take Place of Performance Grade Polymer Modified Asphalt. A whitepaper issued by the Rubberized Asphalt Foundation (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Lo Presti, Recycled Tyre Modified Bitumens for road asphalt mixtures: A literature review, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 49, pp. 863-881 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Way, K. Kaloush, and K. Biligiri, Consulpav Int. and Arizona State University. Asphalt-Rubber Standard Practice Guide. Rubber Pavement Association (2012). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Stroup-Gardiner, Cost Factors, Federal Highway Administration, Crumb Rubber Modifier Workshop, Denver, Colorado, March (1993). [Google Scholar]
  9. G.R. Morris, K.R. Hansen, Cost Considerations of Asphalt-Rubber Hot Mix, (1993). [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Bairgi, S.M. Hossain, R. D. Henrix, Investigation of rheological properties of asphalt rubber toward sustainable use of scrap tires, IFCEE 2015, ASCE, pp. 359-368 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Phoenix Industries, LLC, 1988. 300 E. Delhi Ave. N. Las Vegas, Nevada, 89032, USA. (1988). [Google Scholar]
  12. S.N. Amirkhanian, F. Xiao and K. Sockwell, Performance properties of polymer modified pelletized asphalt mixtures, Proc. of the 2015 Int. Airfield and Highway Pavements Conference, ASCE, pp. 120-130 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. AASHTO T 315-12 (R2016), Standard method of test for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). [Google Scholar]
  14. AASHTO T 350-14, Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). [Google Scholar]
  15. Asphalt Institute, MS-2 Asphalt Mix Design Methods, ISBN: 9781934154700. [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Ma, H. Wang, L. He, Y. Zhao, X. Huang and J. Chen, Property characterization of asphalt binders and mixtures modified by different crumb rubbers, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 29, Issue 7 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. M.D. Domingos, A.L. Faxina, Susceptibilty of asphalt binders to rutting: literature review, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 28, Issue 2, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Kumar, H.C. Mehndiratta, K. Singh, Comparative study of rheological behavior of modified binders for high-temperature areas, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, Issue 10 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Dubois, Y. Mehta, A. Nolan, Correlation between multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) results and polymer modification of binder, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 65, pp. 184-190 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.