EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 184 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 184 (2018) 04025 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 184, 2018
Annual Session of Scientific Papers IMT ORADEA 2018
Article Number 04025
Number of page(s) 6
Section Management and Economics in Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818404025
Published online 31 July 2018
  1. A. Akintoye, T. Craig, F. Eamon, Risk analysis and management of Private Finance Initiative Projects, “Engineering, construction and Management”, 5/1, 9-21 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. F. Al-Bahar, Risk Management in Construction Pro-jects: a systematic Analytical Approach for Contrac-tors, PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 6-27 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Andersen, Competition and Cooperation in Public Service Production, [w:] Public Management - A New Generation in Business and Practice (Wettbewerb und Kooperation in der öffentlichen Dienstleistungsproduktion, [w:] Publik management – Eine neue Generation in Wirtschaft und Praxis), Hrsg. K. Birkholz, C. Mass, P. Siebert, Potsdam, 311 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Asenova, M. Beck, A financial perspective on risk management in public-private partnership [in:] Pub-lic-Private Partnerships: Managing Risks and Oppor-tunities. Ezekiel Ch., Alasdair F. (ed.) Blackwell Sci-ence (2006) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Kauf, A. Tłuczak, Optimization of logistics decisions (Optymalziacja decyzji logistycznych), Warszawa, Difin, 30-50, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. A. Williams Jr., R. M. Heines, Risk Management and Insurance, ed. 3. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York, 67 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Power, The risk management of everything, The Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 5 Issue: 3, 58-65 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. H. Willett, The Economic Theory of Risk and Insurant, Columbia University Studies in Political Science, Nr. 2 (1901) [Google Scholar]
  9. P. L. Bernstein, Against Gods. Unusual risk history (Przeciw Bogom. Niezwykłe dzieje ryzyka), WIG-Press, Warszawa, 19–20 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Vasari, Risk, risk perception, risk management – a review of the literature, Public Finance Quarterly, vol. 1, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. H. Willet, The Economic Theory of Risk Insurance, The University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 6 (1951) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. F. H. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, University of Bosto Press, Boston (1921) [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Dziawgo, Credit-rating. Risk and bonds on the international financial market (Credit-rating. Ryzyko i obligacje na międzynarodowym rynku finansowym), PWN, Warszawa, 13 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  14. Risk Allocation and Contractual Is-sues, http://www.dtf.vic.gov.au/Publications/Infra-structure-Delivery-publicati, (14.02.2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. OECD, Public-Private Partnerships: In the Pursuit of Risk-Sharing and Value for Money, 13 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  16. C. H. Furnell, Risk Identification and Risk Allocation in Project Finance Transactions, paper presented at the Faculty of Law, The University of Melbourne, cited in Partnerships Victoria (2001) [Google Scholar]
  17. The Orange Book Management of Risk - Principles and Concepts, London 2004 [Google Scholar]
  18. G. J. Alexander, W.F. Sharpe, J.V. Bailey, Fundamentals of Investment, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1993) [Google Scholar]
  19. W. F. Samuelson, S.G. Marks, Managerial economics (Ekonomia menedżerska), Warszawa (2009) [Google Scholar]
  20. E. H. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and profit, Cosimo Classics, New York, 233 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  21. PMBOK, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, PMBOK, US, 111-122 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  22. G.J. Alexander, W.F. Sharpe, J.V. Bailey, Fundamentals of Investment, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1993) [Google Scholar]
  23. Ch. Ezekiel, F. Alasdair, A construction perspective on risk management in public-private partnership, [in:] Public-Private Partnerships: Managing Risks and Opportunities. Ezekiel Ch., Alasdair F. (ed.) Blackwell Science (2003) [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Grimsey, M.K. Lewis, Evaluating the risks of pub-lic private partnerships for infrastructure projects, “International Journal of Project Management”, no 20, 107-118 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  25. K. P. Dey, O.S. Ogunlana, Selection and application of risk management tools and techniques for build-op-erate-transfer projects, Industrial Management & Data System, no. 4, 334-346 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Gupta, A. Gupta, Fuzzy multi criteria decision mak-ing approach for vendor evaluation in a supply chain, Interscience Management Review (IMR), Vol. 2, Is-sue 3, 10–16 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  27. F. E. Boran, S. Genc, M. Kurt, D. Akay, A multi-cri-teria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Sys-tems with Applications: An International Journal ar-chive, Vol. 36 Issue 8, 11363-11368 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Kabir, M. A. Hasin, Comparative analysis of topsis and fuzzy topsis for the evaluation of travel website service quality, International Journal for Quality, Vol. 6, No. 3, 169–185 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  29. I. Ertuğrul, N. Karakaşoğlu, Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selec-tion, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 39, 783–795 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. Tansel İç, Development of a credit limit alloca-tion model for banks using an integrated Fuzzy TOP-SIS and linear programming, Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal, Vol. 39, Issue 5, 5309–5316 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. C. C. Sun, A performance evaluation model by inte-grating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, 7745–7754 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.