Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 160, 2018
International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Control and Robotics (EECR 2018)
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Control Theory and Method
Published online 09 April 2018
  1. Oh S, Kang S, Lee K, et al. Flying display: autonomous blimp with real-time visual tracking and image projection[C]//Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 2006: 131-136. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tischler, M.B., Ringland, R.R., and Jex, H.R., "Heavy Airship Dynamics," Journal of Aircraft, Vol.20, No.5, 1983, pp.425–433.doi:10.2514/3.44888 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jex, H.R., and Gelhausen, P., "Pre-and Post-Flight-Test Models Versus Measured Skyship-500 Control Responses," 7th AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Technology Conference, AIAA, NewYork, 1987, pp.87–97. [Google Scholar]
  4. Amann, J.H., " A Comparison of a Nonlinear Flight Dynamic Simulation of an Airship with Flight Test Results," 7th AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Technology Conference, AIAA, NewYork, 1987, pp.78–86. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook, M.V., Lipscombe, J.M., and Goineau, F., "Analysis of the Stability Modes of the Non-Rigid Airship," The Aeronautical Journal, Vol.104, No.1036, 2000, pp.279–290. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmidt, D.K., "Modeling and Near-Space Stationkeeping Control of a Large High-Altitude Airship," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics,Vol.30,No.2,2007,pp.540–547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Y., and Nahon, M., "Modeling and Simulation of Airship Dynamics," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol.30, No.6,2007, pp.1691–1700. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calise A., Nakwan K., 2002 " Adaptive compensation for flexible dynamics". AIAA Guidance, navigation and control conference. Montery, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bianchin M., Quaranta G., Mantegazza P., 2003 "State space reduced order models for static aero elasticity and flight mechanics of flexible aircrafts". 17 national conference AIDAA, Italy,. [Google Scholar]
  10. McLean, D.. Automatic Flight Control Systems. Prentice Hall. 1990 [Google Scholar]
  11. Nichols, R.A., Reichert, R.T., and Rugh, W.J.. Gain scheduling for controllers: A flight control example. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Tech., 1993,1(2): 69-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ochi, Y. and Kanai, K.. Design of restructurable flight control systems using feedback linearization. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1991,14(5),903-911. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Krstic, I. Kanellakopoulos, and P. V. Kokotovic, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, John Wiley Sons, Inc, New York, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Freund and R. May, "Nonlinear Path Control in Automated Vehicle Guidance," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1997,13(1):pp.4940. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Fierro and F. L. Lewis, "Control of a nonholonomic mobile robot: Backstepping kinematics into dynamics," in Proceedings of CDC'95, 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, USA, Dec. 1995, pp. 3805-3810. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Encarnacao and A. Pascoal, "Combined trajectory tracking and path following for marine craft," 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Mar. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  17. Härkegård, O., "Backstepping and Control Allocation with Applications to Flight Control," Ph.D. Thesis, Linköping Univ., Linköping, Sweden,2003. [Google Scholar]
  18. S.P.Jones, J.D.Delaurier, Aerodynamic estimation techniques for aerostats and airships, Journal of aircraft, VoL.20 No.2,1983. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yuwen Li, Dynamics Modeling and Simulation of Flexible Airships, Doctor thesis, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  20. Han D, Wang X, Chen L, et al. Command-filtered backstepping control for a multi-vectored thrust stratospheric airship [J]. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 2015 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.