Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 246, 2018
2018 International Symposium on Water System Operations (ISWSO 2018)
Article Number 01024
Number of page(s) 6
Section Main Session: Water System Operations
Published online 07 December 2018
  1. Nicholls R J, Hoozemans F M J, Marchand M. Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: regional and global analyses[J]. Global Environmental Change, 1999, 9(Suppl 1):S69–S87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Plate E J. Flood risk and flood management[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 267(1):2-11. [Google Scholar]
  3. Apel H, Aronica G T, Kreibich H, et al. Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?[J]. Natural Hazards, 2009, 49(1):79-98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marchi L, Borga M, Preciso E, et al. Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 394(1-2):118-133. [Google Scholar]
  5. Winsemius H C, Beek L P H V, Jongman B, et al. A framework for global river flood risk assessments[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,17,5(2013-05-21), 2013, 17(5):1871-1892. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jain S K, Yoganarasimhan G N, Seth S M. A RISK‐BASED APPROACH FOR FLOOD CONTROL OPERATION OF A MULTIPURPOSE RESERVOIR[J]. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2010, 28(6):1037-1043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen S, Yu G. Variable Fuzzy Sets and its Application in Comprehensive Risk Evaluation for Flood-control Engineering System[J]. Advances in Science & Technology of Water Resources, 2005, 5(2):153-162. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xie Zuotao, Fang Hongwei, Zhong Zhiyu. Research on flood routing in the river nerwork between Jingjiang River and Dongting Lake[J]. Jouranl of Sediment Research, 2010 (6): 38-43. [Google Scholar]
  9. Borgomeo E, Hall J W, Fung F, et al. Risk-based water resources planning: Incorporating probabilistic nonstationary climate uncertainties[J]. Water Resources Research, 2014, 50(8): 6850-6873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baro Suarez J E, Diaz Delgado C, Esteller Alberich M V, et al. Economic flood loss estimation curves for Mexican rural and residential areas. Part 1: methodology proposal [J]. Ingenieriz Hidraulica en Mexico, 2007, 22(1): 91-102. [Google Scholar]
  11. Todorovic P, Rousselle J. Some problems of flood analysis [J]. Water Resource Research, 1971, 7(5): 1144-1150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Downton M W, Morss R E, Wilhelmi O V, et al. Interactions between scientific uncertainty and flood management decisions: Two case studies in Colorado[J]. Global Environmental Change Part B Environmental Hazards, 2005, 6(3):134-146. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jouzdani A, Kabiri-Samani A. Investigations of the Difference in Dam Break Modeling Approaches between 1-D and 2-D Hydrodynamic Model[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2011, 90-93:2423-2426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chu Q, Peng D, Zongxue X U, et al. Risk analysis of Urban flooding by using MIKE 11 and MIKE 21[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Soulis J V. COMPUTATION OF 2-DIMENSIONAL DAM-BREAK FLOOD FLOWS[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1992, 14(6):631-664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang Jinchi, He Xiaoyan. Unified 2-D numerical model for simulating dam break wave propagation[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(2): 222-226. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu T. Calculation Principle and Application Example of a Two-dimensional Flow Model-MIKE21 HD[J]. Port Engineering Technology, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo F, Hanfei Q U, Zeng H, et al. Flood Routing Numerical Simulation of Flood Storage Area Based on MIKE21 FM Model[J]. Water Resources & Power, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zolghadr M, Hashemi M R, Zomorodian S M A. Assessment of MIKE21 model in dam and dikebreak simulation[J]. Iranian Journal of Science & Technology Transaction B Engineering, 2011, 35:247-262. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ashkar D R. Seasonality of flooding and the assessment of flood risk [J]. Proc.Inst.Civ.Eng., 1981,70: 1023-1035. [Google Scholar]
  21. Futter M R, Mawdsley A V. Short-term flood risk prediction: a comparison of the cox regression model and a distribution model [J]. Water Resource Research, 1991, 27(7): 1649-1656. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ding W, Zhang C, Peng Y, et al. An analytical framework for flood water conservation considering forecast uncertainty and acceptable risk[J]. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(6):4702-4726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hurlbert M, Gupta J. Adaptive Governance, Uncertainty, and Risk: Policy Framing and Responses to Climate Change, Drought, and Flood[J]. Risk Analysis, 2016, 36(2):339-356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.