Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 144, 2018
International Conference on Research in Mechanical Engineering Sciences (RiMES 2017)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 10
Section Machine Design
Published online 09 January 2018
  1. Dinh Chi Pham and Sridhar Narayanaswamy, “An Optimization Tool for Impact Analysis of Composite Structures”, Proceedia Eng., 75, pp3 – 8 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Sadighi and M. Saadati, “Unequal faces effect on fracture of composite sandwich beam with flexible core,” Appl. Compos. Mater, 17(2), pp. 111–120 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Vinson, J. R. “The Behavior of Sandwich Structures of Isotropic and Composite Materials”, Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, PA (1999) [Google Scholar]
  4. Aktay, L., Johnson, A. F. and Holzapfel, M. ‘Prediction of impact damage on sandwich composite panels’, Comput. Mater.Sci., 32 (3-4), pp.252–260 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenda, L. B., Carlos, S., Sonia, S., Enrique, B. and Carlos, N. ‘Modelling of composites and sandwich structures with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact’, Compos. Struct., 92(9), pp.2090–2096 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. HooFatt, M. S. and Sirivolu, D. ‘A wave propagation model for the high velocity impact response of a composite sandwich panel’, Int. J. Impact Eng, 37(2), pp.117–130 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morye, S. S., Hine, P. J., Duckett, R.A., Carr, D. J. and Ward, I. M. ‘Modelling of the energy absorption by polymer composites upon ballistic impact’, Compos. Sci. Technol, 60(14), pp.2631–2642 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edgren, F., Soutis, C. and Asp, L. E. ‘Damage tolerance analysis of NCF composites and sandwich panels’, Comp. Sci. Tech., 68 (13), pp.2635–2645, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karger, L., Baaran, J. and Tessmer, J. ‘Rapid simulation of impacts on composite sandwich panels inducing barely visible damage’, Compos. Struct, 79 (4), pp.527–534 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meo, M., Vignjevic, R. and Marengo, G. ‘The response of honeycomb sandwich panels under low-velocity impact loading’, Int. J. Mech. Sci. , 47 (9), pp.1301–1325 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Balasubramani V, Rajendra Boopathy S and Vasudevan R, “Numerical Analysis of Low Velocity Impact on Laminated Composite Plates”, Procedia Eng., 64, pp.1089-1098 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stuart M Lee, “Handbook of composite reinforcement”, Wiley publications, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Mir, C. Aribi, B. Bezzazi, “Study of the Green Composite Jute/Epoxy”, Int. J. Chem., Mol., Nuc., Mat. Met. Engg., 8 (2), (2014). [Google Scholar]
  14. D Tabor, “The bulk modulus of rubber”, Journal of Polymer, 35(13),pp. 2759-2763 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. R. Hossain, M. A. Islam, A. V. Vuurea, and I. Verpoest, “Effect of Fiber Orientation on the Tensile Properties of Jute Epoxy Laminated Composite”, J. Sci. Res. 5 (1), pp. 43-54 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  16. Siow YP, Shim VPW. “An experimental study of low velocity impact damage in woven fibre composites” J.Comp. Mat., 32, (1998) [Google Scholar]
  17. Banks WM, David-West OS, Alexander NV, Nash DH. Energy absorption and bending stiffness in CFRP laminates: The effect of 451 plies. Thin-walled Structures, 46, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  18. Maw, N., Barber, J. R., and Fawcett, J. N., “The Oblique Impact of Elastic Spheres,” Wear, 381, pp. 101–114, (1976) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Philip P. Garland and Robert J. Rogers, “An Experimental Study of Contact Forces during Oblique Elastic Impact” J. Appl. Mech., 76, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  20. Alex M. Remennikov, Sih Ying Kong and Brian Uy, M.ASCE, “Response of Foam-and Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubes under Low-Velocity Impact Loading” J. Perform. Constr. Fac, 373-381, (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.