Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 137, 2017
Modern Technologies in Manufacturing (MTeM 2017 - AMaTUC)
Article Number 07005
Number of page(s) 6
Section Environmental Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713707005
Published online 22 November 2017
  1. H. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, (2003) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. West, A. Salter, W. Vanhaverbeke, H. Chesbrough, Research Policy 43 (5), 805 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Şimşek, N. Yildirim, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235 (24), 719 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. O. Granstrand, The economics of IP in the context of a shifting innovation paradigm, Innovation Report 2011: Shifting Innovation Paradigms and the Role of Intellectual Property. WIPO, Geneva (2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. S.J. Marais, C.S.L. Schutte, The Development of Open Innovation Models to Assist the Innovation Process, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa (2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Trott, D. Hartmann, International Journal of Innovation Management, 13 (4), 715 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Hamid, Int. J. Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 7 (4), 457 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Chesbrough, The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Herzog, Open and closed innovation: different cultures for different strategies, Gabler Verlag, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  10. R. B. Bauer, T. Gegenhuber, Crowdsourcing: Global search and the twisted roles of consumers and producers, Institute of Organization and Global Management Studies, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 22 (5), 661 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. M.N. Wexler, Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: exploring crowdsourcing, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. K.G. Smith, C.J. Collins, K.D. Clark, Academy of Management Journal, 48 (2), 346 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P.J. Lane, B.R. Koka, S. Pathak, Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), 833 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Cassiman, R. Veugelers, Management Science, 52, 68 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Argote, B. McEvily, R. Reagans, Management Science, 49, 571 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. W. C. Bogner, P. Bansal, Journal of Management Studies, 44 (1), 165 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. U. Lichtenthaler, E. Lichtenthaler, Journal of Management Studies, 46, (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Füller, K. Matzler, M. Hoppe, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Füller, Advances in Consumer Research Volume, 33, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Nørskov, Y. M. Antorini, M. B. Jensen, International Journal of Innovation Management, 20, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  21. M. R. Martínez-Torres, Expert Systems with Applications, 7, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Prell, R. Schleich, Social Open Innovation in Online Brand Communities with Particular Regard to the Social Exchange Theory and Brand Management, Lund University, School of Economics and Management, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Bughin, A. Hung Byers, M. Chui, How social technologies are extending the organization, McKinsey Quarterly, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  24. E. S. Lakatos, L. Bacali, O. B. Bercea, C. M. Muresan, A. Moldovan, The benefits of IT tools in innovation process for SME sustainability, In International Conference in Advances in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Gassman, E. Enkel, H. Chesbrough, The future of open innovation, R&D Management, 40, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Krause, C. Schutte, N. du Preez, Open Innovation in South African Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, CIE42 Proceedings, Cape Town, South Africa, 26, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Curley, B. Salmelin, Open innovation 2.0: A new paradigm, Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Curley, Twelve principles for open innovation 2.0, Nature, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Motoiu, O. A. Pavel, E. S. Lakatos, Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 11, (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.