Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 135, 2017
8th International Conference on Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering 2017 (ICME’17)
Article Number 00077
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713500077
Published online 20 November 2017
  1. AFS, “Understanding Porosity American Foundary Society,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.afsinc.org/content.cfm?ItemNumber=6933 [Accessed: 17-Oct-2016]. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. D. Pehlke, “Formation of Porosity During Solidification of Cast Metals,” in Foundry Processes: Their Chemistry and Physics, S. Katz and C. F. Landefeld, Eds. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988, pp. 427–445. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Kumar, S. Gupta, B. Ghodrati, and U. Kumar, “An approach for risk assesment of rail defects,“ Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng., Vol. 17, No 4, pp. 291–311, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. F. Cannon, K. O. Edel, S.L. Grassie and K. Sawley, “Rail defects: An overview,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., Vol. 26, No 10, pp. 865–886, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. H. K. Jun, J. W. Seo, I.S. Jeon, S. H. Lee, and Y. S. Chang, “Fracture and fatigue crack growth analyses on a weld-repaired railway rail,” Eng. Fail. Anal., Vol. 59, pp. 478–492, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. M. Fegredo, M. T. Shehata, A. Palmer and J. Kalousek, “The effect of sulphide and oxide inclusions on the wear rates of a standard C-Mn and a Cr-Mo alloy rail steel,” Wear, Vol. 126, No 3, pp. 285–306, 1988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Mouallif, B. Radi and I. Mouallif, “The thermomechanical modeling of aluminothermic welds affected by different defects Summary :,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Develoment, Vol. 11, No 10, pp. 44–48, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Z. Mouallif, B. Radi and I. Mouallif, “Effect of the Inclusion Defect on the Mechanical Behavior of Thermite Welds,” Adv. Theor. Appl. Mech., Vol. 9, No 1, pp. 11–20, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Mouallif, Z. Mouallif, A. Benali, and F. Sidki, “Finite element modeling of the aluminothermic welding with internal defects and experimental analysis,” in MATEC Web of Conferences, 2012, Vol. 1, p. 12. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. E. Garnham, R.-G. Ding, and C. L. Davis, “Ductile inclusions in rail, subject to compressive rolling–sliding contact,” Wear, Vol. 269, No 11–12, pp. 733–746, Oct. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D.I. Fletcher and S. H. Sanusi, “SBB Rail Analysis,” Sheffield, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. “BEASY Boundary Element software.” [Online]. Available: www.beasy.com. [Accessed: 04-Aug-2016]. [Google Scholar]
  13. G3data, G3data 2010. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/pn2200/g3data. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. I. Fletcher and S. H. Sanusi,“The potential for suppressing rail defect growth through tailoring rail thermo-mechanical properties,” Wear, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Otsuka, K. Mori and T. Miyata, “The condition of fatigue crack growth in mixed mode condition,” Eng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 7, No 3, pp. 429–439, Sep. 1975. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Kapoor, D. I. Fletcher, and F. J. Franklin, “The role of wear in enhancing rail life,” Tribol. Res. Des. Eng. Syst. Proc. 29th Leeds-Lyon Symp. Tribol., vol. Volume 41, No 0, pp. 331–340, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. “Rolling contact fatigue in rails: a guide to current understanding and practice,” in RT/PWG/001 Issue 1, Railtrack PLC, 2001, p. 46. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.