Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 120, 2017
International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems (ASCMCES-17)
Article Number 09001
Number of page(s) 10
Section Geographic Information Systems & Remote Sensing
Published online 09 August 2017
  1. Venkataratnam L. & Manchanda M.L.. Remote sensing in soil resource management. ISPRS Workshop on Application of Remote Sensing and GIS for Sustainable Development. National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad, Nov. 24–25 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  2. Mulder V.L. et al The use of remote sensing in soil and terrain mapping — A review, Geoderma, (2011). doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Van Engelen V. e-SOTER, Annex 1 — Description of Work. EU 211578, ISRIC. Wageningen, The Netherlands report, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson M.C. A thermal-based remote sensing technique for routine mapping of land-surface carbon, water and energy fluxes from field to regional scales. Remote Sens. Environ, 4227–4241, 112,12 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bastiaanssen W.G.M. et al. SEBAL model with remotely sensed data to improve water-resources management under actual field conditions. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 85–93, 131,1 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lagacherie P., McBratney A.B., Voltz M. Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  7. McBratney A.B., Santos M.L., Minasny B. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 3–52, 117,1–2 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carré F., McBratney A.B., Mayr T., Montanarella L. Digital soil assessments: Beyond DSM. Geoderma, 69–79, 142,1–2 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moore A.B., Morris K.P., Blackwell G.K., Jones A.R., Sims P.C. Using geomorphological rules to classify photogrammetrically-derived digital elevation models. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2613–2626, 24,13 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ben-Dor E. et al Imaging spectrometry for soil applications. Adv. Agron. 97, 321–392 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Slaymaker O. The role of remote sensing in geomorphology and terrain analysis in the Canadian Cordillera. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 7, 3,1 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sculla P., Franklina J., Chadwickb O., McArthura D. Predictive soil mapping: a review. Progress in Physical Geography, 171–197, 27,2 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. MacMillan R.A., Jones R.K., McNabb D.H. Defining a hierarchy of spatial entities for environmental analysis and modeling using digital elevation models (DEMs).Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 175–200, 28,3 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Irvin B.J., Ventura S.J., Slater B.K. Fuzzy and isodata classification of landform elements fromdigital terrain data in Pleasant Valley, Wisconsin. Geoderma, 137–154, 77,2–4 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klingseisen B., Metternicht G., Paulus G. Geomorphometric landscape analysis using a semi-automated GIS-approach. Environ. Modell. Softw., 109–121, 23,1(2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tucker J., Pinzon J., Brown M. An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 4485–4498, 26,20 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Engelen W.P.V. Global and national soils and terrain digital databases (SOTER)procedures manual. International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, The Notherland, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. Zainal K., Al-Madany I., Al-Sayed H. The cumulative impacts of reclamation and dredging on the marine ecology and land-use in the Kingdom of Bahrain, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 1452–1458, 64 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Noor Al-Nabi M. The History of Land use and Development in Bahrain. Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain, 16 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  20. Doornkamp J. C, et al. GEOLOGY, GEOMORPHOLOGY AND PEDOLOGY OF BAHRAIN, 314–320 (Norwich, England 1980). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.