MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 120, 2017International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems (ASCMCES-17)
|Number of page(s)||10|
|Section||Fiber Reinforced Construction Materials|
|Published online||09 August 2017|
- L.C. Bank, Composites for Construction: Structural Design with FRP Materials. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2006). [Google Scholar]
- D. Hardjito, and B. V. Rangan, “Development and Properties of Low Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete.” Research Report GC 1, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, (2005). [Google Scholar]
- M.T. Junaid, A. Khennane, O. Kayali, A. Sadaoui, D. Picard, and M. Fafard, “Aspects of the deformational behaviour of alkali activated fly ash concrete at elevated temperatures.” Cem. Concr. Res., 60, 24–29. (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Junaid, M.T., Khennane, A., and Kayali, O. (2015). “Performance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete made using non-pelletized fly ash aggregates after exposure to high temperature.” Mater. Struct. 48(10), 3357–3365 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Pecce, G. Manfredi, R. Realfonzo, and E. Cosenza, “Experimental and Analytical Evaluation of Bond Properties of GFRP Bars.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 13(4), 282–290 (2001). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- B. Benmokrane, B. Tighiouart, and O. Chaallal, “Bond Strength and Load Distribution of Composite GFRP Reinforcing Bars in Concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 93(3), 246–252 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- E. Cosezna, G. Manfredi and R. Realfonzo, “Behaviour and Modelling of Bond of FRP Rebars to Concrete.” J. Compos. Constr., 1(2), 40–51, (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Okelo, and R.L. Yuan, “Bond strength of fiber reinforced polymer rebars in normal strength concrete.” J. Comp. Constr., 9(3), 203–213 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Focacci, A. Nanni, and C. E. Bakis, “Local Bond-Slip Relationship for FRP Reinforcement in Concrete.” J. Compos. Constr., 4(1), 24–31(2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Cui, and O. Kayali, “Bond Performance of Steel Bar and Fly Ash based Geopolymer Concrete.” Concrete Institute of Australia Biennial National Conference: Understanding Concrete, Gold Coast, Australia (2013). [Google Scholar]
- Ee Hui Chang, et Al, Bond Behaviour of Reinforced Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Beams, The 24th Biennial Conference of the Concrete Institute of Australia,. Luna Park, Sydney Sep 17, (2009). [Google Scholar]
- B. H. Tekle, A. Khennane, O. Kayali “Bond properties of sand-coated GFRP bars with fly ash based geopolymer concrete.” J. Compos. constr. 20(5), (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G., M. A. Maranan, “Bond Stress-Slip Behavior: Case of GFRP Bars in Geopolymer Concrete.” ASCE J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 27(1), 1–9. (2015). [Google Scholar]
- American Concrete Institute (ACI). “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary.” ACI 318M-08, Farmington Hills, Mich. [Google Scholar]
- American Concrete Institute (ACI). “Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension.” ACI 408R-03, Farmington Hills, Mich. [Google Scholar]
- ACI (American Concrete Institute). “Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with FRP bars.” ACI 440.1R-06, Farmington Hills, MI. (2006). [Google Scholar]
- American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). “Standard test method for comparing bond strength of steel reinforcing bars to concrete using beam-end specimens” ASTM A944 - 10, West Conshohocken, PA. (2010). [Google Scholar]
- American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). “Standard Specification for Coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete.” ASTM C618 - 12a, West Conshohocken, PA. (2012). [Google Scholar]
- Australian Standard (AS). “Aggregates and rock for engineering purposes - Concrete aggregates.” AS 2758.1:2014. Australia. (2014). [Google Scholar]
- M.T. Junaid, O. Kayali, A. Khennane and J. Black, “A mix design procedure for low calcium alkali activated fly ash-based concretes.” Constr. Build. Mater., 79, 301–310, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.