Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 108, 2017
2017 International Conference on Mechanical, Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering (ICMAA 2017)
Article Number 13001
Number of page(s) 4
Section Biomedical Engineering
Published online 31 May 2017
  1. Tolunay, T., Arslan, K., Yaman, O., Dalbayrak, S., & Demir, T. Biomechanical Performance of Various Cement-Augmented Cannulated Pedicle Screw Designs for Osteoporotic Bones. Spine Deformity, 3(3), 205–210 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. B.E McKoy and Y. H An. An injectable cementing screw for fixation in osteoporotic bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 53(3), 216–220 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, H. C., Lai,- Y. S., Chen, W. C., Chen, J. W., Chang, C. M., Chen, Y. L., Cheng, C. K.. Effect of different radial hole designs on pullout and structural strength of cannulated pedicle screws. Med Eng Phys, 37(8), 746–751 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abshire BB, McLain RF, Valdevit A, Kambic HE. Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back out. Spine J 1:408–414 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bianco RJ, Arnoux PJ, Mac-Thiong JM, Wagnac E, Aubin CE. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw pullout strength. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 16(Suppl 1):246–248 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chao CK, Hsu CC, Wang JL, Lin J Increasing bending strength and pullout strength in conical pedicle screws: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(2):130–138 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chao KH, Lai YS, Chen WC, Chang CM, McClean CJ, Fan CY, et al. Biomechanical analysis of different types of pedicle screw augmentation: cadaveric and synthetic bone sample study of instrumented vertebral specimens. Med Eng Phys. 35:1506–12. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chatzistergos PE, Magnissalis EA, Kourkolis SK. A parametric study of cylindrical pedicle screw design implications on the pullout performance using an experimentally validated finite element model. Med Eng Phys 32:145–154 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Paré, P. E., Chappuis, J. L., Rampersaud, R., Agarwala, A. O., Perra, J. H., Erkan, S., & Wu, C. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel fenestrated pedicle screw augmented with bone cement in osteoporotic spines. Spine, 36(18), E1210–E1214 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Patel, R. D., Graziano, G. P., Vanderhave, K. L., Patel, A. A., & Gerling, M. C. Facet. Violation With the Placement of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws. Spine, 36(26), E1749–E1752 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.