Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 107, 2017
Dynamics of Civil Engineering and Transport Structures and Wind Engineering – DYN-WIND’2017
Article Number 00022
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710700022
Published online 24 May 2017
  1. G. Genta, L. Morello, The Automotive Chassis. Volume 2: System Design (Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. COSMOS/M, Finite Element Analysis System, User Guide, Version 2.5 (SRAC, Los Angeles, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Smola, J. Jankovec, M. Hejman, Static and Dynamic FEM Calculations of the NEOPLAN DMA Low-floor Articulated Trolleybus, Research Report VYZ 0693/2004 (ŠKODA VÝZKUM s.r.o. Plzeň, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Polach, Verified Multibody Model of the Empty NEOPLAN DMA Low-floor Articulated Trolleybus and Results of Running over the Large Road Unevenness Simulations, Research Report VYZ 0726/2004 (ŠKODA VÝZKUM s.r.o. Plzeň, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Polach, Manufacturing Technology, 15, 1, 77–86 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Popp, W. Schiehlen, Ground Vehicle Dynamics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. T. D. Gillespie, S. M. Karamihas, Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 7, 1, 52–63 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Vlk, Dynamics of motor vehicles (VLK Publishing House, Brno, in Czech, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Blundell, D. Harty, The Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics (Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Hegazy, H. Rahnejat, K. Hussain, P. I. Mech. Eng. K-J. Mul. 213, 1, 19–31 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  11. D. G. Rideout, Modern Mechanical Engineering, 2, 4, 176–189 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.J. Thoresson, P.E. Uys, P.S. Els, J.A. Snyman, Math. Comput. Model. 50, 9–10, 1421–1436 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Margolis, D. Edeal, SAE Technical Paper 892488 (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Michelberger, A. Keresztes, J. Bokor, P. Variaki, SAE Technical Paper 845120 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P.S. Els, P.E. Uys, J.A. Snyman, M.J. Thoresson, Math. Comput. Model. 43, 7–8, 787–801 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Eriksson, O. Friberg, Struct. Multidiscip. O. 20, 1, 67–75 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Andersson, P. Eriksson, Vehicle Syst. Dyn., Suppl. 41, 547–556 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Kowarska, J. Skarbek, K. Kuczek, T. Uhl, Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport, 18, 4, 205–212 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Kowarska, J. Korta, K. Kuczek, T. Uhl, Shock Vib. 2014, ID 201952 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Hegazy, H. Rahnejat, K. Hussain, Vehicle Syst. Dyn. 34, 1, 1–24 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Polach, Manufacturing Technology, 13, 4, 515–520 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Maißer, C.-D. Wolf, A. Keil, K. Hendel, U. Jungnickel, H. Hermsdorf, P. A. Tuan, G. Kielau, O. Enge, U. Parsche, T. Härtel, H. Freudenberg, alaska, User Manual, Version 2.3 (Institute of Mechatronics, Chemnitz, 1998) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.