Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 100, 2017
13th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management (GCMM 2016)
Article Number 05027
Number of page(s) 10
Section Part 5: Management Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710005027
Published online 08 March 2017
  1. Xu Lingling. Institutional environment, ownership structure and technological innovation. Soft Science, 2015 (12): 22–26. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ancona G, Caldwell F. Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 1989, 3(3):321–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhen Hong-Xian, Zhang Xian-Zhi, Chi Gui-Tai. The Impact of Institutional Environment and Ultimate Control on Corporate Performance: An Intermediary Effect Test Based on Agency Cost. Financial Research 2015 (12): 162–177. [Google Scholar]
  4. Williams Y. demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in organizational behavior, 1998, 20 (3): 77–140. [Google Scholar]
  5. Blumberg M, Pringle D. The missing opportunity in organizational Research: some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 1982, 7 (4): 560–569. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Freel S. Perceived environmental uncertainty and innovation in small firms. Small Business Economics, 2005, 25 (1): 49–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu Hao, Wen Jun, Feng Tao. Institutional Environment, Financial Development and Technological Innovation. Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2016 (6): 44–53. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu Jibing, Wang Qi, Ma Huanyu. Institutional environment on the strategic emerging industry innovation ability. Science and technology progress and countermeasures 2015 (23): 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liao Kaorong, Chen Shuangying. Empirical Research on the Impact of Institutional Environment on R & D Investment of Private Enterprises. Science Research, 2011 (9): 1342–1348. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao Huifang, Zhou Yanlei, Zhang Xuan. The Influence of Institutional Environment on Enterprise R & D Investment. Friends of Accounting, 2011 (31): 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  11. Simons T, Smith K A. Makinguse Of Difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness intopmanagementteams. Academic Journal of Management, 1999, 42 (6): 662–673. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou Jianhua. Network Relation Embedding, Regional Institutional Environment and Technological Innovation. Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics (in Chinese), 2016 (5): 50–62. [Google Scholar]
  13. Finkelstein S. Top-Management-Team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35 (3): 484–503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Allan J D. The effects of reduction in trout density on the invertebrate community of a mountain stream. Ecology, 1982, 63 (5): 1444–1455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Biwu, Shi Jintao. Characteristics of Board of Directors, Executive Compensation and Pay Sensitivity: An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Listed Companies. Management Science, 2005 (4): 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sun Yin-feng, Li Xiao-qing. Heterogeneity, Financial Innovation and Financial Performance of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Listed Banks in Shanghai and Shenzhen. Financial Theory and Practice, 2014 (6): 44–50. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lei Hui, Liu Peng. SME executive team characteristics on the impact of technological innovation - based on the nature of ownership perspective. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2013 (4): 30–52. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu Jin-wei, Peng Jin-jin, Liu Jing. Study on the Influence of Top Management Team Characteristics on the Input of Technological Innovation in Enterprises - The Regulation Effect of Incentives, Science in Policy, 2014 (8): 17–33. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen Rui, Jing Runtian. The Effect of Team Heterogeneity on Team Members’ Innovation Performance. Technology Economics, 2012 (12): 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zheng Xiao-Dan, Huang Yi. Analysis on the Effect of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on the Input of Technology Innovation in Enterprises - An Empirical Analysis Based on Fujian Province and Shandong Province. Journal of Hunan University of Commerce, 2015 (6): 51–57 . [Google Scholar]
  21. Bai Jing-kun, Li Sha-sha. Research on Heterogeneity, Strategic Decision Quality and Innovation Performance of Top Management Teams. Journal of Northeast University of Finance and Economics, 2015 (5): 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xie Feng-hua, Yao Xian-guo, Gu Jia-jun. Empirical Research on the Relationship between Top Management Team Heterogeneity and Firm’s Technological Innovation Performance. journal of Scientific Management, 2008, 29 (6): 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  23. Putnam M. Bridging network divides: building capacity to support aging with disability populations through research .Disability & Health Journal, 2014, 7 (7): S51–S59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang Ying. The Impact of Social Capital on Corporate Debt Maturity Structure: Evidence from Listed Companies in China. Journal of Zhejiang Finance and Economics University, 2016 (5): 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cheng Cong, Xie Hongming, Ying Chen, et al. Study on the Relationship among Network, Internal and External Social Capital and Technological Innovation. Scientific Research Management, 2013 (11): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  26. Robert A. Ape, o Alessandra Fag, Ian. Cullective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. regional studies, 2005, 39 (1): 75–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu Yun-guo, Liu Wen. The Term of Office and R & D Expenditure of Chinese Listed Companies. Management World, 2007 (1): 128–136. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang Xiaolu, Yu Jingwen, Fan Gang. Analysis of the Indexes of Business Environment in China by Province in 2013 (abstract). Journal of National School of Administration, 2013 (4): 24–34. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hou Wang-bin, Zhang Yu-li, Yang Jun. Homogeneity or Heterogeneity: The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Regulating the Relationship between Technology Entrepreneurial Teams and New Firm Performance. Management World, 2014 (6): 92–109. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.