Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 100, 2017
13th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management (GCMM 2016)
Article Number 02013
Number of page(s) 11
Section Part 2: Internet +, Big data and Flexible manufacturing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710002013
Published online 08 March 2017
  1. J. Qin, X. Liu, W. Pedrycz. A multiple attribute interval type-2 fuzzy group decision making and its application to supplier selection with extended LINMAP method. Soft Computing. 1–20 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Guha, D. Chakraborty. Fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method to achieve consensus under the consideration of degrees of confidence of experts’ opinions ☆. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 4, 493–504 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Xiong, Y.W. Chen, K.W. Yang. A decision support model for multi-attribute group decision making using a multi-objective optimization approach. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems. 2, 337–353 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Zahir. Clusters in a group: Decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 3, 620–634 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Bolloju. Aggregation of analytic hierarchy process models based on similarities in decision makers’ preferences ☆. European Journal of Operational Research. 3, 499–508 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Tapia-Rosero, Bronselaer A, Tré G D. A method based on shape-similarity for detecting similar opinions in group decision-making. Information Sciences. 258, 291–311 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Liu, Y Shen, X Chen. A partial binary tree DEA-DA cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems. Information Fusion. 1, 119–130 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Liu, Y. Shen, Y. Chen. A two-layer weight determination method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making experts in a linguistic environment. Information Fusion. 23, 156–165 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Palomares, L. Martinez, F. Herrera. A Consensus Model to Detect and Manage Noncooperative Behaviors in Large-Scale Group Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 3, 516–530 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. X.H. Xu, X.Y. Zhong, X.H. Chen. A dynamical consensus method based on exit–delegation mechanism for large group emergency decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems. 86, 237–249 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Zhang, J. Ignatius, Y. Zhao. An improved consensus-based group decision making model with heterogeneous information. Applied Soft Computing. 35, 850–863 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Atanassov, G. Gargov. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets & Systems. 3, 343–349 (1989). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S.P. Wan, G.L. Xu, F. Wang. A new method for Atanassov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MAGDM with incomplete attribute weight information. Information Sciences. 316, 329–347 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Al-Aomar. A combined AHP-entropy method for deriving subjective and objective criteria weights. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Theory Applications & Practice. 1, 12–24 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Yu, Y. Wu, N. Yu. Fuzzy comprehensive approach based on AHP and entropy combination weight for pipeline leak detection system performance evaluation// Systems Conference (SysCon), 2012 IEEE International. 1–6 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  16. I.A. Curtis. Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes. Ecological Economics. 3–4, 163–194 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Li, X. Chu, D. Chu. An integrated approach to evaluate module partition schemes of complex products and systems based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 7, 675–689 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Xu, J. Zhou, R. Gu. Approach for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and its application to reservoir operation. Expert Systems with Applications. 7, 9032–9035 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Zhang, L. Yu. MADM method based on cross-entropy and extended TOPSIS with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2, 115–120 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. K.T. Atanassov. Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Physica-Verlag HD. 343–349 1999. [Google Scholar]
  21. L.C. Jang, W.J. Kim, T. Kim. A Note on Distances between Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic & Intelligent Systems. 1, 8–11 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Wang. A Novel Multi-attribute Allocation Method Based on Entropy Principle. Journal of Software Engineering. 1, 16–20 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Simanaviciene, L. Ustinovichius. Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods: TOPSIS and SAW. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 6, 7743–7744 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.