Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 90, 2017
The 2nd International Conference on Automotive Innovation and Green Vehicle (AiGEV 2016)
Article Number 01036
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179001036
Published online 20 December 2016
  1. H. C. Ong, T. M. I. Mahlia and H. H. Masjuki. (2012). A review on energy pattern and policy for transportation sector in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 532–542. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Fazeli, F. Bakhtvar, L. Jahanshaloo, N. A. Che Sidik and A. E. Bayat. (2016). Malaysia’s stand on municipal solid waste conversion to energy: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1007–1016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. F. Wang, K. P. Li, X. M. Xu and Y. R. Zhang. (2014). Transport energy consumption and saving in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 641–655. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. S. H. Najjar. (2013). Protection of the environment by using innovative greening technologies in land transport. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 480–491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. A. Osman, A. J. Alimin, M. Y. Ismail and K. W. Hui. (2013). Performance and Emission Characteristics of Direct Injection C.I Engine Retrofitted with Mono-CNG System. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 446–447, 443–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. L. Salvi, K. A. Subramanian and N. L. Panwar. (2013). Alternative fuels for transportation vehicles: A technical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 404–419. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. L. Salvi and N. L. Panwar. (2012). Biodiesel resources and production technologies – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), 3680–3689. [Google Scholar]
  8. B. M. Masum, H. H. Masjuki, M. A. Kalam, S. M. Palash, M. A. Wakil and S. Imtenan. (2014). Tailoring the key fuel properties using different alcohols (C2–C6) and their evaluation in gasoline engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 88, 382–390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B. M. Masum, H. H. Masjuki, M. A. Kalam, S. M. Palash and M. Habibullah. (2015). Effect of alcohol–gasoline blends optimization on fuel properties, performance and emissions of a SI engine. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 230–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Elfasakhany. (2015). Investigations on the effects of ethanol–methanol–gasoline blends in a spark-ignition engine: Performance and emissions analysis. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 18(4), 713–719. [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Jin, M. Yao, H. Liu, C.-f. F. Lee and J. Ji. (2011). Progress in the production and application of n-butanol as a biofuel. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 4080–4106. [Google Scholar]
  12. I. M. Yusri, M. K. Akasyah, R. Mamat and O. M. Ali. (2015). Combustion and emissions characteristics of a compression ignition engine fuelled with n-butanol blends. Jurnal Teknologi (Science and Engineering), 77(8), 69–73. [Google Scholar]
  13. I. M. Yusri, R. Mamat, O. M. Ali, A. Aziz, M. Akasyah, M. K. Kamarulzaman, et al. (2016). The combustion of n-butanol-diesel fuel blends and its cycle to cycle variability in a modern common-rail diesel engine. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(4), 2297–2301. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Irimescu. (2012). Performance and fuel conversion efficiency of a spark ignition engine fueled with iso-butanol. Applied Energy, 96, 477–483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. Chen, Z. Wu, J. Liu and C. Lee. (2014). Combustion and emissions characteristics of high n-butanol/diesel ratio blend in a heavy-duty diesel engine and EGR impact. Energy Conversion and Management, 78, 787–795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Uyumaz. (2015). An experimental investigation into combustion and performance characteristics of an HCCI gasoline engine fueled with n-heptane, isopropanol and nbutanol fuel blends at different inlet air temperatures. Energy Conversion and Management, 98, 199–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. G. Giakoumis, C. D. Rakopoulos, A. M. Dimaratos and D. C. Rakopoulos. (2013). Exhaust emissions with ethanol or n-butanol diesel fuel blends during transient operation: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 17, 170–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Demirbas. (2008). Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(8), 2106–2116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Feng, J. Fu, J. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Li, B. Deng, et al. (2015). Combustion and emissions study on motorcycle engine fueled with butanol-gasoline blend. Renewable Energy, 81, 113–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Szwaja and J. D. Naber. (2010). Combustion of n-butanol in a spark-ignition IC engine. Fuel, 89(7), 1573–1582. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. X. Gu, Z. Huang, J. Cai, J. Gong, X. Wu and C.-f. Lee. (2012). Emission characteristics of a spark-ignition engine fuelled with gasoline-n-butanol blends in combination with EGR. Fuel, 93, 611–617. [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Dernotte, C. Mounaim-Rousselle, F. Halter and P. Seers. (2009). Evaluation of butanol–gasoline blends in a port fuel-injection, spark-ignition engine. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole, 65(2), 345–351. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Galloni, G. Fontana, S. Staccone and F. Scala. (2016). Performance analyses of a spark-ignition engine firing with gasoline–butanol blends at partial load operation. Energy Conversion and Management, 110, 319–326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. B. Singh, A. Dhar and A. K. Agarwal. (2015). Technical feasibility study of butanol–gasoline blends for powering medium-duty transportation spark ignition engine. Renewable Energy, 76, 706–716. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Elfasakhany. (2014). Experimental study on emissions and performance of an internal combustion engine fueled with gasoline and gasoline/n-butanol blends. Energy Conversion and Management, 88, 277–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. Yacoub, R. Bata and M. Gautam. (1998). The performance and emissions characteristics of C1-C5 alcohol-gasoline blends with matched oxygen content in a single-cylinder spark igntion engine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 212. [Google Scholar]
  27. F. N. Alasfour. (1997). Butanol - A single-engine study: Availability analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering, 17(6), 537–549. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Alasfour. (1999). The effect of using 30% iso-butanol-gasoline blend on hydrocarbon emissions from a spark-ignition engine. Energy Sources, 21(5), 379–394. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. M. K. Balki and C. Sayin. (2014). The effect of compression ratio on the performance, emissions and combustion of an SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with pure ethanol, methanol and unleaded gasoline. Energy, 71, 194–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Christensen, J. Yanowitz, M. Ratcliff and R. L. McCormick. (2011). Renewable oxygenate blending effects on gasoline properties. Energy & Fuels, 25(10), 4723–4733. [Google Scholar]
  31. K. Nithyanandan, H. Wu, M. Huo and C.-F. Lee. (2014). A preliminary investigation of the performance and emissions of a port-fuel Injected SI engine fueled with acetonebutanol-ethanol (ABE) and gasoline. SAE technical paper 2014-04-01. [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Saxena and C. Jotshi. (1994). Fluidized-bed incineration of waste materials. Progress in Energy and combustion Science, 20(4), 281–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. I. Jahirul, H. Masjuki, R. Saidur, M. Kalam, M. Jayed and M. Wazed. (2010). Comparative engine performance and emission analysis of CNG and gasoline in a retrofitted car engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30(14), 2219–2226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. G. Broustail, F. Halter, P. Seers, G. Moréac and C. Mounaim-Rousselle. (2012). Comparison of regulated and non-regulated pollutants with iso-octane/butanol and isooctane/ethanol blends in a port-fuel injection spark-ignition engine. Fuel, 94, 251–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.