EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 76 (2016) MATEC Web Conf., 76 (2016) 04001 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2016
20th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2016)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 4
Section Computers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167604001
Published online 21 October 2016
  1. Socialstyrelsen. God vård – om ledningssystem för kvalitet och patientsäkerhet i hälso- och sjukvården In: Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm (2006) [Google Scholar]
  2. European Commission. Semantic Interoperability for Better Health and Safer Healthcare. Research and deployment roadmap for Europe. In: Commission E, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  3. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology. Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on Defining Key Health Information Technology Terms, Available at: http://cdm16064.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p266901coll4/id/2086 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Stroupe, What is EHR Interoperability and Why Should I Care? A reference document for Urgent Care and Occupational Health Providers (2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. Interoperability Definition and Background. Available at http://www.himss.org/ResourceLibrary/ResourceDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=9265 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  6. European Commission. Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/isa (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. European Commission. eHealth Governance Initiative, Making Use of SNOMED CT: Key Questions And Status As Of September 2013. Available at: ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/events/ev_20131119_en.htm. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Andreen, L. Dobie, J. Jasperson, T. Lucas, C. Wubbenhorst. The conversion to electronic hospital notes at Mayo Clinic. Overcoming barriers and challenges. JHIM, 24(3), pp. 57–64 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Bernstein, M. Bruun-Rasmussen, S. Vingtoft, S. K. Andersen, C. Nøhr. Modelling and implementing electronic health records in Denmark. IJMI, 74(2), pp 213–20 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  10. D.R. Boulware, A.S. Dekarske, G.A. Filice, Physician Preferences for Elements of Effective Consultations. JGIM, 25(1), pp:25–30 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. V.K. Goradia. Electronic Medical Records for the Arthroscopic Surgeon. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 22(2), pp 219–24 2006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J.C. Denny, Iii A. Spickard, K.B. Johnson, N.B. Peterson, J.F. Peterson, R.A. Miller. Evaluation of a Method to Identify and Categorize Section Headers in Clinical Documents. JAMIA, 16(6), pp 806–15 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Törnvall, S. Wilhelmsson, Nursing documentation for communicating and evaluating care. JCN, 17(16), pp 2116–24. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Cusack, Electronic Health Records and Electronic Prescribing: Promise and Pitfalls. OBSTET GYN CLIN N AM, 35(1), pp 63–79 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Nordman, Överskrift, titel, namn eller rubrik? Några beteckningar i teori och praktik. In: Nuopponen A TB, Myking J, editor. I terminologins tjänst Festskrift för Heribert Picht på 60-årsdagen Vaasa: Vasa universitet, pp. 110–7 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Häyrinen, K. Harno, P. Nykänen, Use of headings and classifications by physicians in medical narratives of EHRs: An evaluation study in a Finnish hospital. ACI, 2(2), pp 143–57 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Ahlfeldt, M. Ehnfors, L. Ridderstolpe, Towards a Multi-professional Patient Record – A Study of the Headings Used in Clinical Practice. (1999). Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu [Google Scholar]
  18. A.B. De Luna, G. Wagner, Y. Birnbaum, K. Nikus, M. Fiol, A. Gorgels, et al. A new terminology for left ventricular walls and location of myocardial infarcts that present Q wave based on the standard of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A statement for healthcare professionals from a committee appointed by the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiography. Circulation, 114(16), pp. 1755–60 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A.J. Maxwell, N.T. Ridley, G. Rubin, M.G. Wallis, F.J. Gilbert, M.J. Michell, The Royal College of Radiologists Breast Group breast imaging classification. CLIN RADIOL, 64(6), pp. 624–7. (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Schargus, F. Grehn, The European Glaucoma Society Glaucocard project: Improved digital documentation of medical data for glaucoma patients based on standardized structured international datasets. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol, 246(12), pp. 1757–68 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Ehrenberg, M. Ehnfors, I. Thorell-Ekstrand, Developing a national integrated classification of health care interventions in Sweden. IJMI, 74(11-12), pp. 973–9 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Ozbolt, M.L. Wilson, D O’Brien, Much Ado About Terminology Standards. J. Perianesth. Nurs., 22(4), pp. 280–4 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Thoroddsen, M. Ehnfors, A. Ehrenberg, Content and Completeness of Care Plans After Implementation of Standardized Nursing Terminologies and Computerized Records. CIN, 29(10), pp. 599–607 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  24. American Occupational Therapy Association. Uniform terminology for occupational therapy. Third edition. Am J Occup Ther., 48(11), pp. 1047–54 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Buyl, M. Nyssen, Structured electronic physiotherapy records. IJMI, 78(7), pp. 473–81. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  26. K.R. Goeg, R. Chen, A.R. Hojen, P. Elberg, Content analysis of physical examination templates in electronic health records using SNOMED CT. IJMI, 83(10), pp. 736–49 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Watkins, R. Haskell, C. Lundberg, J. Brokel, M. Wilson, N. Hardiker, Terminology use in electronic health records: basic principles, Urol Nurs, 29(5), pp. 321–6; quiz 7. (Sep-Oct 2009) [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Tapuria, D. Kalra, S. Kobayashi, Contribution of Clinical Archetypes, and the Challenges, towards Achieving Semantic Interoperability for EHRs. HIR, 19(4), pp. 286–92 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Zeleznik, B. Agard-Henriques, B. Schnebel, D.L. Smith, Terminology Used by Different Health Care Providers to Document Skin Ulcers: the Blind Men and the Elephant. Journal of WOCN, 30(6), pp. 324–33. (2003) [Google Scholar]
  30. A-B. Jensdóttir, P. Jónsson, A. Noro, E. Jonsén, G. Ljunggren, H. Finne-Soveri, et al. Comparison of nurses’ and physicians’ documentation of functional abilities of older patients in acute care - Patient records compared with standardized assessment. SJCS, 22(3), pp. 341–7 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  31. Socialstyrelsen. Nationell informationsstruktur (2016) Available at: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/nationellehalsa/nationellinformationsstruktur. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.