Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2016
20th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2016)
Article Number 03012
Number of page(s) 6
Section Communications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167603012
Published online 21 October 2016
  1. S. Fenz and A. Ekelhart. “Formalizing Information Security Knowledge.” In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information, Computer, and Communications Security, 2009, 183–194. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Lasheras, R. Valencia-García, J. T. Fernández-Breis, and A. Toval. “Modelling reusable security requirements based on an ontology framework.” Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology,vol. 41, no. 2 pp. 119–133, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Martimiano and E. Moreira. “An owl-based security incident ontology.” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Protege Conference, 2005, pp. 43–44. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Blanco, J. Lasheras, E. Fernández-Medina, R. Valencia-García, and A. Toval, “Basis for an integrated security ontology according to a systematic review of existing proposals,” Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 372–388, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. N.F. Noy and D.L. McGuinness. “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology”. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, March 2001. [Google Scholar]
  6. Protégé. http://protege.stanford.edu/. [Oct. 01, 2015] [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Zesch, I. Gurevych and M. Mühlhäuser. “Analyzing and Accessing Wikipedia as a Lexical Semantic Resource.” Data Structures for Linguistic Resources and Applications, pp. 197–205, 2007. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.