Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 75, 2016
2016 International Conference on Measurement Instrumentation and Electronics (ICMIE 2016)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 06006 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Network Technology | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167506006 | |
| Published online | 01 September 2016 | |
- A. Sikora, M. Schappacher, L. Möllendorf, “Automated RF Emulator for a highly scalable IEEE802.11p communication and localization subsystem,” in 6th Intl Workshop on Communication Technologies for Vehicles, Offenburg, (2014) [Google Scholar]
- L. Möllendorf, D. Schauenberg, N. Braun, D. Rahusen, A. Sikora, “A Distributed Embedded Web2.0 Based Automated Testbed for Wireless Mesh Networks,” in 1st IEEE Int’l Workshop On AWN, Leipzig, (2009) [Google Scholar]
- Ni Pei Zheng and M. Lionel, “EMWIN: Emulating a Mobile Wireless Network using a Wired Network,” in In Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile multimedia, (2002) [Google Scholar]
- A. Yushev, P. Lehmann, A. Sikora, V.F. Groza, “Extended Performance Measurements of Scalable 6LoWPAN Networks in an Automated Physical Testbed,” in IEEE Int’l Conference I²MTC, Pisa, (2015) [Google Scholar]
- M. Allman, A. Caldwell, and S. Ostermann, “ONE: The Ohio Network Emulator,” Ohio University, Tech Report TR-19972, August (1997) [Google Scholar]
- E. Kohler, R. Morris, B. Chen, J. Jannotti, and M. F. Kaashoek, “The Click Modular Router,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 18, pp. 263-297, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Rizzo, “Dummynet: a simple approach to the evaluation of network protocols,” ACM Computer Communication Review, vol. 27, (1997) [Google Scholar]
- http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/itg/nistnet [Google Scholar]
- K. Fall, “Network Emulation in the VINT/NS Simulator”, In Proceedings of 4th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, (1999) [Google Scholar]
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_virtualization [Google Scholar]
- D. Maltz, J. Broch, and D. Johnson. “Experiences Designing and Building a Multi-Hop Wireless Ad-Hoc Network Testbed”. In CMU TR99-116, (1999) [Google Scholar]
- H. Lunndgren, D. Lundberg, J. Nielsen, E. Nordstrom, and C. Tscudin. “A Large-scale Testbed for Reproducible Ad Hoc Protocol Evaluations”. In Proc. of WCNC, (2002) [Google Scholar]
- D. Johnson, T. Stack, R. Fish, D. M. Flickinger, L. Stoller, R. Ricci, and J. Lepreau. “Mobile Emulab: A Robotic Wireless and Sensor Network Testbed” In IEEE Infocom, (2006) [Google Scholar]
- http://www.ecsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mint/ [Google Scholar]
- L. Cremean, W. Dunbar, D. van Gogh, J. Hickey, E. Klavins, J. Meltzer, and R. M. Murray. “The Caltech Multi-Vehicle Wireless Testbed” In Proc. of Conference on Decision and Control, (2002) [Google Scholar]
- D. Johnson, T. Stack, R. Fish, D. M. Flickinger, L. Stoller, R. Ricci, and J. Lepreau. “Mobile Emulab: A Robotic Wireless and Sensor Network Testbed” In IEEE Infocom, (2006) [Google Scholar]
- A. Yushev, P. Lehmann, A. Sikora, “6LoWPAN with RPL Performance Measurements in an Automated Physical Testbed”, 2nd IEEE IDAACS SWS, Offenburg, Germany, pp. 29-33, (2014) [Google Scholar]
- M. Ringwald, K. Römer, “Deployment of Sensor Networks: Problems and Passive Inspection”, Proc. of WISES ‘07, Madrid, Spain, (2007) [Google Scholar]
- http://www.ansolutions.de/documents/@ANY900_2_Module_Leaflet.pdf [Google Scholar]
- http://194.75.38.69/pdfs/ZFRSC-183+.pdf [Google Scholar]
- http://194.75.38.69/pdfs/ZB3PD-63+.pdf [Google Scholar]
- http://194.75.38.69/pdfs/VAT-30.pdf [Google Scholar]
- http://194.75.38.69/pdfs/ZX76-15R5-SP+.pdf [Google Scholar]
- http://194.75.38.69/pdfs/ZASWA-2-50DR+.pdf [Google Scholar]
- http://194.75.38.69/pdfs/141-6SM+.pdf [Google Scholar]
- http://www.rfshieldbox.com/datasheets/STE2200.pdf [Google Scholar]
- http://194.75.38.69/pdfs/ANNE-50+.pdf [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.