EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 74 (2016) MATEC Web Conf., 74 (2016) 00037 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 74, 2016
The 3rd International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Research (ICMER 2015)
Article Number 00037
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167400037
Published online 29 August 2016
  1. Pidol L,Lecointe B,Starck L,Jeuland N. Ethanol–biodiesel–Diesel fuel blends: Performances and emissions in conventional Diesel and advanced Low Temperature Combustions. Fuel. 2012;93:329–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shahir SA,Masjuki HH,Kalam MA,Imran A,Ashraful AM. Performance and emission assessment of diesel–biodiesel–ethanol/bioethanol blend as a fuel in diesel engines: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;48:62–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bendu H,Murugan S. Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) combustion: Mixture preparation and control strategies in diesel engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;38:732–46. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mohanamurugan S,Sendilvelan S. Emission and combustion characteristics of different fuel In A HCCI engine. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2011;3:279–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hairuddin A,Wandel A,Yusaf T. An introduction to a homogeneous charge compression ignition engine. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2014;7:1042–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Saxena S,Shah N,Bedoya I,Phadke A. Understanding optimal engine operating strategies for gasoline-fueled HCCI engines using crank-angle resolved exergy analysis. Applied Energy. 2014;114:155–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Abdullah NR,Shahruddin NS,Mamat R,Ihsan Mamat A,Zulkifli A. Effects of air intake pressure on the engine performance, fuel economy and exhaust emissions of a small gasoline engine. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2014;6:949–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yashwanth MS,Venugopal T,Ramesh A. Experimental and simulation studies to determine the effective octane number in an engine fuelled with ethanol and gasoline. International Journal of Automotive & Mechanical Engineering. 2014;10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Stanglmaier RH,Roberts CE. Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI): benefits, compromises, and future engine applications. SAE Technical Paper; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  10. Najafi G,Ghobadian B,Tavakoli T,Buttsworth D,Yusaf T,Faizollahnejad M. Performance and exhaust emissions of a gasoline engine with ethanol blended gasoline fuels using artificial neural network. Applied Energy. 2009;86:630–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yap D, Megaritis A, Wyszynski M. An investigation into bioethanol homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine operation with residual gas trapping. Energy & fuels. 2004;18:1315–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tongroon M, Zhao H. Combustion characteristics of CAI combustion with alcohol fuels. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. Christensen M,Johansson B,Einewall P. Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) using isooctane, ethanol and natural gas-a comparison with spark ignition operation. SAE Technical Paper; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mack JH, Aceves SM, Dibble RW. Demonstrating direct use of wet ethanol in a homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine. Energy. 2009;34:782–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Viggiano A, Magi V. A comprehensive investigation on the emissions of ethanol HCCI engines. Applied Energy. 2012;93:277–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xie H, Wei Z, He B, Zhao H. Comparison of HCCI combustion respectively fueled with gasoline, ethanol and methanol through the trapped residual gas strategy. SAE Technical Paper; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li Y, Zhao H, Brouzos N. CAI combustion with methanol and ethanol in an air-assisted direct injection SI engine. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sjoberg M, Dec JE. Ethanol autoignition characteristics and HCCI performance for wide ranges of engine speed, load and boost. SAE Technical Paper; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  19. Splitter DA, Hanson RM, Reitz RD, Manente V, Johansson B. Modeling charge preparation and combustion in diesel fuel, ethanol, and dual-fuel PCCI engines. Atomization and Sprays. 2011;21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hasan M, Rahman M, Kadirgama K. A review on homogeneous charge compression ignition engine performance using biodiesel-diesel blend as a fuel. International Journal of Automotive & Mechanical Engineering. 2015;11. [Google Scholar]
  21. De Nicolao G, Scattolini R, Siviero C. Modelling the volumetric efficiency of IC engines: parametric, non-parametric and neural techniques. Control Engineering Practice. 1996;4:1405–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saber HA, Al-Barwari RRI, Talabany ZJ. Effect of ambient air temperature on specific fuel consumption of naturally aspirated diesel engine. Journal of science and engineering: volume 1. 2013;1:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rajput R. A text book of Automobile Engineering: Firewall Media; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stotsky AA. Automotive engines: control, estimation, statistical detection: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hillier VAW, Coombes P. Hillier’s fundamentals of motor vehicle technology: Nelson Thornes; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hairuddin AA, Yusaf T, Wandel AP. A review of hydrogen and natural gas addition in diesel HCCI engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;32:739–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guzzella L, Onder C. Introduction to modeling and control of internal combustion engine systems: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Basshuysen R, Schäfer F. Internal combustion engine handbook-basics, components, systems and perspectives 2004. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ganesh D, Nagarajan G. Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) combustion of diesel fuel with external mixture formation. Energy. 2010;35:148–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ebrahimi R, Ghanbarian D, Tadayon MR. Performance of an Otto engine with volumetric efficiency. J Am Sci. 2010;6:27–31. [Google Scholar]
  31. Menrad H, Nierhauve B. Engine and vehicle concepts for methanol-gasoline blends. SAE Technical Paper; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  32. Behçet R. Performance and emission study of waste anchovy fish biodiesel in a diesel engine. Fuel Processing Technology. 2011;92:1187–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lakshmi Narayana Rao G, Durga Prasad B, Sampath S, Rajagopal K. Combustion analysis of diesel engine fueled with jatropha oil methyl ester-diesel blends. International Journal of Green Energy. 2007;4:645–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Puhan S, Vedaraman N, Sankaranarayanan G, Ram BVB. Performance and emission study of Mahua oil (Madhuca indica oil) ethyl ester in a 4-stroke natural aspirated direct injection diesel engine. Renewable Energy. 2005;30:1269–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Swaminathan C, Sarangan J. Performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a CI engine fueled with biodiesel (fish oil) with DEE as additive. biomass and bioenergy. 2012;39:168–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Heywood JB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals: Mcgraw-hill New York; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rahimi H, Ghobadian B, Yusaf T, Najafi G, Khatamifar M. Diesterol: An environment-friendly IC engine fuel. Renewable Energy. 2009;34:335–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gumus M, Sayin C, Canakci M. The impact of fuel injection pressure on the exhaust emissions of a direct injection diesel engine fueled with biodiesel–diesel fuel blends. Fuel. 2012;95:486–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gowthami K, Murali S, Reddy VN. Performance and analysis of super charging and blends of rice bran oil biodiesel as an additive in diesel-ethanol for diesel engines. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li L, Wang J, Wang Z, Xiao J. Combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engine fueled with diesel/biodiesel/pentanol fuel blends. Fuel. 2015;156:211–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li D-g, Zhen H, Xingcai L, Wu-gao Z, Jian-Guang Y. Physico-chemical properties of ethanol–diesel blend fuel and its effect on performance and emissions of diesel engines. Renewable energy. 2005;30:967–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lujaji F, Kristóf L, Bereczky A, Mbarawa M. Experimental investigation of fuel properties, engine performance, combustion and emissions of blends containing croton oil, butanol, and diesel on a CI engine. Fuel. 2011;90:505–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cinar C, Uyumaz A, Solmaz H, Sahin F, Polat S, Yilmaz E. Effects of intake air temperature on combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a HCCI engine fueled with the blends of 20% n-heptane and 80% isooctane fuels. Fuel Processing Technology. 2015;130:275–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yilmaz N, Vigil FM, Benalil K, Davis SM, Calva A. Effect of biodiesel–butanol fuel blends on emissions and performance characteristics of a diesel engine. Fuel. 2014;135:46–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Cinar C, Uyumaz A, Solmaz H, Topgul T. Effects of valve lift on the combustion and emissions of a HCCI gasoline engine. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015;94:159–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.