Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 74, 2016
The 3rd International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Research (ICMER 2015)
Article Number 00002
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 29 August 2016
  1. Elzenheimer, J., Liebeck, T and Tschannerl, M. Noch viel ungenutztes Potenzial beim Bohren. Werkstatt und Betrieb. 2003; 136(11):55–57. [Google Scholar]
  2. Heinemann, R., Hinduja, S., Barrow G. Use of process signals for tool wear progression sensing in drilling small deep holes. International Journal Advance Manufacturing Technology. 2007; 33: 243–250 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Statistical methods for manufacturing process improvement. Retrived from: 15 April 2014 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ghoreishi, M., Low, D.K.Y., Li, L. Comparative statistical analysis of hole taper and circularity in laser percussion drilling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2002; 42: 985–995 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kadam, M.S and Pathak, S.S. Experimental Analysis and Comparative Performance of Coated and Uncoated Twist Drill Bit Dry Machining. International Journal of Research in Mechanical Engineering and Technology. 2011; 1: 2249–5762 [Google Scholar]
  6. Rao, S. and Lewlyn L.R.Dr. Impact Of Process factors On Twist Drill Wear In Machining gfrp Composites By Applying Taguchi Design Analysis And Anova Technique. International Journal of Advanced Technology & Engineering Research (IJATER). 2014; 4: 2250–3536 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gaja, H. Analysis and modeling of depth-of-cut during end milling of deposited material. Masters Theses, Missouri University of Sceince and Technology. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pontuale, G., Farrelly, F.A., Petri, A., and Pitolli, L. A statistical analysis of acoustic emission signals for tool condition monitoring (TCM). Acoustics Research Letters Online. 2003; 4(1): 1529–7853 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. xiqing, M and Chuangwen, Xu. Tool wear monitoring of acoustic emission signals from milling processes. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, ETCS. 2009; 1: 431–435 [Google Scholar]
  10. Karali, P. Acoustic Emission based Tool Condition Monitoring System in Drilling. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering. 2011; 3: 2078–0958 [Google Scholar]
  11. Issam, A.M. Drilling wear detection and classification using vibrations signals and artificial neural network. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2003; 43:707–720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jantunen, E. and Jokinen, H. Automated On-line Diagnosis of Cutting Tool Condition. International Journal of Flexible Automation and Integrated Manufacturing. 1996; 4:273–287. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sambayi, P.M.K. Drill wear monitoring using instantaneous angular speed: A comparison with conventional technology used in drill monitoring systems. Masters Theses, University of Pretoria. 2012 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jie, X. Drill wear prediction and drilling conditionsrecognition with newly generated features. Ph.D Theses, Hiroshima University. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heinemann, R., Hinduja, S,. Barrow, G., Petuelli, G. The Performance of Small Diameter Twist Drills in Deep-Hole Drilling. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2006;128. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jantunen, E. A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2002; 42:997–1010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Signal Processing Toolbox, For use with MATLAB User’s guide. The Math Works USA. 1998 [Google Scholar]
  18. El-Wardany, T.I., Gao, D. and Elbestawi, M.A. Tool condition monitoring in drilling using vibration signature analysis. International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacture. 1996; 36(6): 687–711 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.