Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00123
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. A. Gillen, A. Wright, and L. Spink, “Student perceptions of a positive climate for learning: a case study,” Educ. Psychol. Pract., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 65–82, Mar. 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Altan, “Energy efficiency interventions in UK higher education institutions,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 7722–7731, Dec. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Sapri and S. Muhammad, “Monitoring energy performance in higher education buildings for sustainable caumpus,” Malaysian J. Real Estate, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. A. Hassanain, “Post-Occupancy Indoor Environmental Quality Evaluation of Student Housing Facilities,” Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 249–256, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. L. Olanrewaju, M. F. Khamidi, and A. Idrus, “Quantitative analysis of defects in Malaysian university buildings : Providers ‘,” J. Retail Leis. Prop., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, “Building Performance Evaluation In Higher Education Properties: Towards A Process Model,” in Construction and Building Research Conference (COBRA) 1999, 1999, pp. 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Almeida, V. Sousa, L. Alves Dias, and F. Branco, “A framework for combining risk-management and performance-based building approaches,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 157–174, Apr. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. J. Cole, “Building environmental assessment methods : assessing construction practices,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 949–957, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Lützkendorf and D. Lorenz, “Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 644–661, Nov. 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Lützkendorf and D. P. Lorenz, “Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 334–356, Jul. 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. B. J. Meacham, “Risk-informed performance-based approach to building regulation,” J. Risk Res., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 877–893, Oct. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Wolski, N. A. Dembsey, and B. J. Meacham, “Accommodating perceptions of risk in performance-based building ‘re-safety’ code development,” Fire Saf. J., vol. 34, pp. 297–309, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Zalejska-Jonsson, “Evaluation of low-energy and conventional residential buildings from occupants’ perspective,” Build. Environ., vol. 58, pp. 135–144, Dec. 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Public Works Department, Garis Panduan Pemeriksaan Dan Penilaian Keadaan Bangunan Sedia Ada (JKR 21602 - 0004 - 13), JKR 21602-. Bahagian Senggara Fasiliti Bangunan, Cawangan Kejuruteraan Senggara Ibu Pejabat JKR Malaysia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. I. Che-Ani, A. S. Ali, M. M. Tahir, N. A. G. Abdullah, and N. M. Tawil, “The Development of a Condition Survey Protocol (CSP) 1 Matrix for Visual Building Inspection,”in The Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (COBRA2010), 2-3 September 2010, 2010, pp. 8–22. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. S. Ali, S. N. Kamaruzzaman, R. Sulaiman, and Y. C. Peng, “Factors affecting housing maintenance cost in Malaysia,” J. Facil. Manag., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 285–298, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. B. P. Thompson and L. C. Bank, “Risk Perception in Performance-Based Building Design and Applications to Terrorism-Resistant Design,” no. February, pp. 61–69, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, “Appraising the total performance of higher education buildings: A participator y approach towards a knowledge-base system,” in Construction and Building Research Conference 1998 : Proceedings (COBRA) 2nd-3rd September 1998, Oxford Brookes University, 1998, pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Douglas, “Building performance and its relevance to facilities management,” Facilities, vol. 14, no. April, pp. 23–32, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, “A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance,” Prop. Manag., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 171–189, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  21. G. McDougall, J. R. Kelly, J. Hinks, and U. S. Bititci, “A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings,” J. Facil. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 142–153, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J. E. Woods, “Expanding the Principles of Performance to Sustainable Buildings,” Real Estate Issues, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 37–46, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  23. B. Meacham, R. Bowen, J. Traw, and A. Moore, “Performance-based building regulation: current situation and future needs,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 91–106, Mar. 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Malmqvist and M. Glaumann, “Environmental efficiency in residential buildings – A simplified communication approach,” Build. Environ., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 937–947, May 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. H. H. Ali and S. F. Al, “Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan,” Build. Environ., vol. xxx, no. 2008, pp. 1–12, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Camilleri, R. Jaques, and N. Isaacs, “Impacts of climate change on building performance in New Zealand,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 440–450, Nov. 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Meins, H. Wallbaum, R. Hardziewski, and A. Feige, “Sustainability and property valuation: a risk-based approach,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 280–300, Jun. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Spence, “Risk and regulation: can improved government action reduce the impacts of natural disasters?,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 391–402, Sep. 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. R. N. Whitfield, “Managing Institutional Risks – A Framework”, University of Pennsylvania, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  30. T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  31. T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 48, pp. 9–26, 1990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Alexander, “Decision-Making using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and SAS / IML ®,” in SESUG 2012, 2012, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  33. K. Bunruamkaew, “How to do AHP analysis in Excel The Analytical Hierarchy Process - AHP,” 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Z. Chen, D. Clements-croome, J. Hong, H. Li, and Q. Xu, “A multicriteria lifespan energy efficiency approach to intelligent building assessment,” Energy Build., vol. 38, pp. 393–409, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. C. A. Poveda and M. Lipsett, “A Review of Sustainability Assessment and Sustainability/Environmental Rating Systems and Credit Weighting Tools,” J. Sustain. Dev., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 36–55, Nov. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  36. HsiehT., S. Lu, and G.-H. Tzeng, “Project Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 22, pp. 573–584, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. D. C.-W. Ho, K.-W. Chau, A. King-Chung Cheung, Y. Yau, S.-K. Wong, H.-F. Leung, S. Siu-Yu Lau, and W.-S. Wong, “A survey of the health and safety conditions of apartment buildings in Hong Kong,” Build. Environ., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 764–775, May 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. I. N. Pujawan and L. H. Geraldin, “House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 953–967, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Clift, “Building quality assessment (BQA) for offices,” Struct. Surv., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 22–25, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Baird, J. Gray, N. Isaacs, D. Kernohan, and G. McIndoe, Building Evaluation Technique. McGraw–Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  41. H. Abdul-Rahman, C. L. Kwan, and P. C. Woods, “Quality function deployment in construction design : application in low-cost housing design,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 591–605, 1999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. A. M. M. Liu, “The quest for quality in public housing projects : a behaviour-to-outcome paradigm,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 21, pp. 147–158, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. A. T. Goh and Y. Ahmad, “Public Low-Cost Housing In Malaysia : Case Studies On Ppr Low-Cost Flats In Kuala Lumpur,” Kuala Lumpur, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  44. H. N. Husin, A. H. Nawawi, F. Ismail, and N. Khalil, “Preliminary Survey of Integrated Safety Elements into Post Occupancy Evaluation for Malaysia ‘ s Low Cost Housing,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 36, no. June 2011, pp. 583–590, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. G. Augenbroe and C.-S. Park, “Quantification methods of technical building performance,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 159–172, Mar. 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. W. Trinius and C. Sjöström, “Service life planning and performance requirements,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 173–181, Mar. 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. A. L. Olanrewaju, “Quantitative Analysis of Criteria in University Building Maintenance in Malaysia,” Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 51–61, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. A. L. Olanrewaju, M. F. Khamidi, and A. Idrus, “Building Maintenance Management in a Malaysian University Campuses : A Case Study,” Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build., vol. 10, no. 1/2, pp. 76–89, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  49. A. L. Olanrewaju, “Case for alternative approach to building maintenance management of public universities,” J. Build. Apprais., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 201–212, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Integrated Asset Planning Branch (CPAB), “Sesi 1: Pengenalan dan Keperluan Building Condition Assessment (BCA),” 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. P. Massingham, “Knowledge risk management: a framework,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 464–485, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. P. X. W. Zou, S. Redman, and S. Windon, “Case Studies on Risk and Opportunity at Design Stage of Building Projects in Australia: Focus on Safety,” Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 221–238, 2008. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.