Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00114
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600114
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. A.J. Nelson, O. Rakau and P. Dörrenberg (2010), Green Buildings – A Niche Becomes Mainstream, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt am Main. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Crump, (2011). Climate Change— Health Impacts Due to Changes in the Indoor Environment;Research Needs. Cranfield University, Institute of Environment and Health. [Google Scholar]
  3. Committee on the Assessment of Asthma and Indoor Air, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Staff, & Institute of Medicine Staff. (1900). Clearing the air: asthma and indoor air exposures. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. R.M. Harrison, C.A. Thornton, R.G. Lawrence, D. Mark, R.P. Kinnersley, J.G. Ayres, 2002.Personal exposure monitoring of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide, including susceptible groups. Occup. Environ. Med. 59, 671–679. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Vardoulakis, 2009. Human exposure: indoor and outdoor. In: Air Quality in Urban Environments 28, 85–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H.K. Lai, M. Kendall, H. Ferrier, I. Lindup, S. Alm, O. Hänninen, M. Jantunen, P. Mathys, R. Colvile, M.R. Ashmore, P. Cullinan, M.J. Nieuwenhuijsen, 2004. Personal exposures and microenvironment concentrations of PM2.5, VOC, NO2 and CO in Oxford, UK. Atmos. Environ. 38, 6399–6410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. N. Kamaruzzaman, C. O. Egbu, E. M. A. Zawawi, A. S. Ali, & A. I. Che-Ani (2011). The effect of indoor environmental quality on occupants’ perception of performance: A case study of refurbished historic buildings in Malaysia. Energy and Buildings, 43(2), 407–413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. WHO, 2011. Health Co-benefits of Climate Change Mitigation — Housing Sector. World Health Organization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. V. Andersen, J. Toftum, K. K. Andersen, & B. W. Olesen (2009). Survey of occupant behaviour and control of indoor environment in Danish dwellings. Energy and Buildings, 41(1), 11–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. D. Galasiu, & J. A. Veitch (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728–742. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. A. Veitch, & G. R. Newsham (2000). Exercised control, lighting choices, and energy use: An office simulation experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 219–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. F. Nicol, I. A. Raja, A. Allaudin, & G. N. Jamy (1999). Climatic variations in comfortable temperatures: the Pakistan projects. Energy and Buildings, 30(3), 261–279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Ncube, & S. Riffat (2012). Developing an indoor environment quality tool for assessment of mechanically ventilated office buildings in the UK–A preliminary study. Building and Environment, 53, 26–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Chiang, C. Lai, P. Chou, Y. Li, & Y. Tu (1999). The study on the comprehensive indi-cators of indoor environment assessment for occupants’health. In ASIA-PACIFICConference on the Built Environment 1993, Taipei, (pp. 1–7). [Google Scholar]
  15. W.L. Paul, P.A. Taylor (2008). A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building. Building and Environment (43), 1858–1870. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Salonen, M. Lahtinen, S. Lappalainen, N. Navala, L. D. Knibbs, L. Morawska,et al. (2013). Design approaches for promoting beneficial indoor environmentsin healthcare facilities: A review. Intelligent Buildings International, 5(1), 26–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Smith, & M. Pitt (2011). Healthy workplaces: Plant scaping for indoor environmental quality Facilities, 29(3/4), 169–187. [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Huang, Y. Zhu, Q. Ouyang, & B. Cao (2012). A study on the effects of ther-mal, luminous, and acoustic environments on indoor environmental comfortin offices. Building and Environment, 49, 304–309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Croitoru, A. Vartires, F. Bode, & A. Dogeanu (2013). Survey evaluation of theindoor environment quality in a large Romanian hospital. INCAS Bulletin, 5(3),45–52. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Astolfi, & F. Pellerey (2008). Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 163–173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. a. Humphreys (2005). Quantifying occupant comfort: Are combined indices of the indoor environment practicable? Building Research & Information, 33(4),317–325 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. C. K. Lai, K. W. Mui, L. T. Wong, & L. Y. Law (2009). An evaluation model forindoor environmental quality (IEQ) acceptance in residential buildings. Energyand Buildings, 41(9), 930–936. [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Chiang, C. Lai, P. Chou, Y. Li, & Y. Tu (1999). The study on the comprehensive indi-cators of indoor environment assessment for occupants’health. In ASIA-PACIFICConference on the Built Environment 1993, Taipei, (pp. 1–7). [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Heinzerling, S. Schiavon, T. Webster, & E. Arens (2013). Indoor environmentalquality assessment models: A literature review and a proposed weighting andclassification scheme. Building and Environment, 70, 210–222 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. W. Mui, & W. T. Chan (2005). A new indoor environmental quality equation forair-conditioned buildings. Architectural Science Review, 48(1), 41–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. C. K. Lai, K. W. Mui, L. T. Wong, & L. Y. Law (2009). An evaluation model forindoor environmental quality (IEQ) acceptance in residential buildings. Energyand Buildings, 41(9), 930–936 [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Frontczak, R. V. Andersen, & P. Wargocki (2012). Questionnaire survey on fac-tors influencing comfort with indoor environmental quality in Danish housing. Building and Environment, 50, 56–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. V. De Giuli, O. Da Pos, & M. De Carli (2012). Indoor environmental quality and pupilperception in Italian primary schools. Building and Environment, 56, 335–345. [Google Scholar]
  29. S.A. Abdul- Wahab, S.C.F. En,A. Elkamel, L. Ahmadi,K. Yetilmezsoy (2015). A review of standards and guidelines set by international bodies for the parameters of indoor air quality. Atmospheric Pollution Research (6) 751–767. [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Carlucci, F. Causone, F.D. Rosa, L. Pagliano(2015). A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (47)1016–1033 [Google Scholar]
  31. S. A. Abdul–Wahab, S. C. F. En, A. Elkamel, L. Ahmadi, & K. Yetilmezsoy (2015). A review of standards and guidelines set by international bodies for the parameters of indoor air quality. Atmospheric Pollution Research,6(5), 751–767. [Google Scholar]
  32. P.S. Nimlyat, M.Z. Kandar (2015) Appraisal of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in healthcarefacilities: A literature review. Cities and Society (17) 61–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. L. Sarbu,C. Sebarchievici (2013) . Review Aspects of indoor environmental quality assessment in buildings. Energy and Buildings (60)410–419. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Martellotta, A. Simone, S.D Crociata, M. D’Alba(2016).Global comfort and indoor environment quality attributes for workers of a hypermarket in Southern Italy. Building and Environment 95. 355–364. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Vardoulakis, C. Dimitroulopoulou, J. Thornes (2015).Review article Impact of climate change on the domestic indoor environment and associated health risks in the UK. Environment International 85.299–313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Norhidayah, M.K. Lee Chia-Kuang Azhar S. Nurulwahida. (2013). Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome in Three Selected Building. Procedia Engineering (53) 93–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Langer, O. Ramalho, M. Derbez (2016). Indoor environmental quality in French dwellings and building characteristics. Atmospheric Environment (128) 82–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Turunen, O. Toyinbo, T. Putus, A. Nevalainen (2014). Indoor environmental quality in school buildings, and the health andwellbeing of students. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health (217)733–739. [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Persily (2015). Challenges in developing ventilation and indoor air quality standards:The story of ASHRAE Standard 62. Building and Environment.(91) 61–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. I. J. Onakpoya, J. O’Sullivan, M. J. Thompson, & C. J. Heneghan (2015). The effect of wind turbine noise on sleep and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Environment international, 82, 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Pekkonen, a,L Du, M. Raatikainen (2015). The influence of tenure status on housing satisfaction and indoorenvironmental quality in Finnish apartment buildings. Building and Environment (89)134–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. S.N. Willich, K. Wegscheider, M Stallmann, M.( 2006). Noise burden and the risk of myocardial infarction Thomas Keil. European Heart Journal (27), 276–282.]. [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Lavelle, 2010. The Solvable Problem of Energy Poverty. National Geographic News. [Google Scholar]
  44. J.A. Raub, M. Mathieu-Nolfb, N.B. Hampsonc, S.R. Thomd, 2000. Carbon monoxide poisoning — a public health perspective. Toxicology 145 (1), 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. S. Darby, D. Hill, A. Auvinen, J. M. Barros-Dios, H. Baysson, F., … Bochicchio & I. Heid (2005). Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. Bmj, 330(7485), 223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. R. E. Jordan, K. K. Cheng, M. R. Miller, & P. Adab (2011). Passive smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: cross-sectional analysis of data from the Health Survey for England. BMJ open, 1(2), e000153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. A. J. Chauhan, & S. L. Johnston (2003). Air pollution and infection in respiratory illness. British medical bulletin, 68(1), 95–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. A. F. Taylor, F. E. Kuo, & W. C. Sullivan (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of environmental psychology, 22(1), 49–63. [Google Scholar]
  49. W. J. Fisk, & A. H. Rosenfeld (1997). Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments. Indoor air, 7(3), 158–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. A. N. S. I. Ashrae (2004). Standard 55-2004, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineering, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  51. J. Jansz (2011). Introduction to sick building syndrome. In Sick Building Syndrome(pp. 1–24). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. WHO, (2002). The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Health Life. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  53. X. Bonnefoy (2007). Inadequate housing and health: an overview. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 30(3-4), 411–429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. J. Lampietti, & A. Meyer (2002). When heat is a luxury: helping the urban poor of Europe and Central Asia cope with the cold. World Bank, Washington DC., [Google Scholar]
  55. J. Barreiro, M. Sánchez, & M. Viladrich-Grau* (2005). How much are people willing to pay for silence? A contingent valuation study. Applied economics, 37(11), 1233–1246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. M. Kohlhuber, A. Mielck, S. K. Weiland, & G. Bolte (2006). Social inequality in perceived environmental exposures in relation to housing conditions in Germany. Environmental research, 101(2), 246–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. M. Bilger, & V. Carrieri (2013). Health in the cities: when the neighborhood matters more than income. Journal of Health Economics, 32(1), 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.