EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 66 (2016) MATEC Web Conf., 66 (2016) 00080 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00080
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600080
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. IPCC. Synthesis Report, Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. (2007) Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. BegumR. A., SohagK., AbdullahS. M. S., & JaafarM.. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 594–601 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. NC2. Malaysia’s second national communication(NC2) – a report submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC), Conservation and Environmental Management Division(CEMD), Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE). Available from: <http://nc2.nre.gov.my/>; 2011 [accessed 25 August 2015]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Department of Communities and Local Government. Building a greener future: policy statement. (2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Schlueter, and F. Thesseling. Building information model basedenergy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages, Automation in Construction,18 (2):153–163 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Biswas, T. H. Wang, R. Krishnamurti. Integrated sustainable building rating systems with building information modeling. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp. 193–200 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. AutodeskInc. Building Information Modeling for Sustainable Design. Autodesk® Revit® White Paper (2005) [Google Scholar]
  8. MotawaI., and Carter.K. Sustainable BIM-based Evaluation of Buildings, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 74:116–125 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. AzharS., and Brown.J. BIM for sustainability analyses. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 5(4): 276–292 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. AzharS., BrownJ., and FarooquiR., BIM-based sustainability analysis: An evaluation of building performance analysis software. Proceedings of the 45th ASC Annual Conference, Gainesville, Florida (2009) [Google Scholar]
  11. AzharA., CarltonW. A., OlsenD, and AhmadI., Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED® rating analysis. Automation in construction, 20 (2): 217–224 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. ColeR. J., & LarssonN., Building challenge 2002: GBTool user manual (2002) Available from: www.iisbe.org/iisbe/gbc2k5/gbc2k5-start.htm/ [access 20 August 2015]. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Jrade & F. Jalaei, Integrating building information modelling with sustainability to design building projects at the conceptual stage. In Building Simulation (Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 429–444). Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Krygiel, and B. Nies, BIM. Green Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing, IN (2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. K. C. D. Grace, Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464 (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. W. L. Lee, A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes. Energy and Buildings, 62, 403–413 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. CSI (Construction Specifications Institute). The CSI Sustainable Design and Construction Practice Guide. John Wiley & Sons, Inc (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. S. H. Alyami, & Y. Rezgui, Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 5, 52–62 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. BRE. BRE homepage. (2011) Available from: http://www.bre.co.uk/ [access 18 September 2015]. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Raslanas, A. Stasiukynas, & E. Jurgelaityte, Sustainability assessment studies of recreational buildings. Procedia Engineering, 57, 929–937 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Haapio, & P. Viitaniemi, A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental impact assessment review, 28(7), 469–482 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.