Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00035
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600035
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. Adriaanse, C. C. M. (2007). Measuring residential satisfaction: a residential environmental satisfaction scale (RESS). Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(3), 287. [CrossRef]
  2. Altman, I., & Werner, C. M. (1985). Home environments (Vol. 8). New York: Plenum Press. [CrossRef]
  3. Altman, I., & Wohlwill, J. F. (1976). Human behavior and environment: advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum Press. [CrossRef]
  4. Ball, J. n., & Srinivasan, V. C. (1994). Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in house selection. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9(1), 69–85. [CrossRef]
  5. Baer, W. C. (1986). The Evolution of Local and Regional Housing Studies. Journal of the American Planning Association, 52(2), 172–184. [CrossRef]
  6. Bender, A., Din, A., Favarger, P., Hoesli, M., & Laakso, J. (1997). An Analysis of Perceptions Concerning the Environmental Quality of Housing in Geneva. Urban Studies, 34(3), 503–513. [CrossRef]
  7. Berkoz, L., Turk, S., & Kellekci, M. (2009). Environmental Quality and User Satisfaction in Mass Housing Areas: The Case of Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 17(1), 161. [CrossRef]
  8. Bontje, M. (2004). From suburbia to post-suburbia in the Netherlands: Potentials and threats for sustainable regional development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(1), 25. [CrossRef]
  9. Brown, L. A., & Moore, E. G. (1970). The Intra-Urban Migration Process: A Perspective. Geografiska Annaler, 52(1), 13.
  10. Cervero, R. (1996b). Jobs-housing balance revisited. American Planning Association. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 492. [CrossRef]
  11. Chapple, K. (2006). Overcoming Mismatch: Beyond Dispersal, Mobility, and Development Strategies. American Planning Association. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 322. [CrossRef]
  12. Davies, J. E. (1938). Fundamentals of housing study: a determination of factors basic to an understanding of American housing problems. New York: AMS Press.
  13. Fang, Y. (2006). Residential Satisfaction, Moving Intention and Moving Behaviours: A Study of Redeveloped Neighbourhoods in Inner-City Beijing. Housing Studies, 21(5), 671. [CrossRef]
  14. Fiadzo, E. D., Houston, J. E., & Godwin, D. D. (2001). Estimating housing quality for poverty and development policy analysis: CWIQ in Ghana. Social Indicators Research, 53(2), 137. [CrossRef]
  15. Ge, J., & Hokao, K. (2004). Residential environment index system and evaluation model established by subjective and objective methods. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, 5(9), 7.
  16. Gober, P., McHugh, K. E., & Leclerc, D. (1993). Job-rich but housing poor: The dilemma of a Western amenity town. Professional Geographer, 45(1), 12. [CrossRef]
  17. Ha, M., & Weber, M. J. (1994). Residential quality and satisfaction: Toward developing residential quality indexes. Home Economics Research Journal, 22(3), 296. [CrossRef]
  18. Harris, R. N. S., Tolley, G. S., & Harrell, C. (1968). The Residence Site Choice. Review of Economics & Statistics, 50(2), 241. [CrossRef]
  19. Hays, R. A., & Alexandra, M. K. (2007). Neighborhood attachment, social capital building, and political participation: A case study of low-and moderate-income residents of Waterloo, Iowa. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(2), 181. [CrossRef]
  20. Kain, J. F., & Quigley, J. M. (1970). Measuring the Value of Housing Quality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(330), 532–548. [CrossRef]
  21. Karien, D. (2007). Social Capital, Neighbourhood Attachment and Participation in Distressed Urban Areas. A Case Study in The Hague and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 22(3), 355. [CrossRef]
  22. Karsten, L. (2007). Housing as a Way of Life: Towards an Understanding of Middle-Class Families’ Preference for an Urban Residential Location. Housing Studies, 22, 83. [CrossRef]
  23. Kauko, T. (2006). What makes a location attractive for the housing consumer? Preliminary findings from metropolitan Helsinki and Randstad Holland using the analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(2), 159. [CrossRef]
  24. Kellekci, O. L., & Berkoz, L. (2006). Mass Housing: User Satisfaction in Housing and its Environment in Istanbul, Turkey. European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), 77–99. [CrossRef]
  25. Kleinhans, R., Priemus, H., & Engbersen, G. (2007). Understanding Social Capital in Recently Restructured Urban Neighbourhoods: Two Case Studies in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 44(5/6), 1069. [CrossRef]
  26. Lansing, J. B., & Marans, R. W. (1969). Evaluation of Neighborhood Quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(3), 5.
  27. Levine, J. (1998). Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance. American Planning Association. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), 133. [CrossRef]
  28. Leyden, K. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1546. [CrossRef]
  29. Li, L. H. (2008a). The physical environment and a “sense of neighborhood” in residential communities in Hong Kong. Property Management, 26, 7. [CrossRef]
  30. Linneman, P. (1981). The demand for residence site characteristics. Journal of Urban Economics, 9(2), 129–148. [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Z., & Wu, F. (2006). Socio-spatial Differentiation and Residential Inequalities in Shanghai: A Case Study of Three Neighbourhoods. Housing Studies, 21(5), 695. [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, K.-R., & Banister, D. (2006). Extended Excess Commuting: A Measure of the Jobs-Housing Imbalance in Seoul. Urban Studies, 43(11), 2099. [CrossRef]
  33. Middleton, A., Murie, A., & Groves, R. (2005). Social Capital and Neighborhoods that Work. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1711. [CrossRef]
  34. Ottensmann, J. R. (1977). Urban Sprawl, Land Values and the Density of Development. Land Economics, 53(4), 389. [CrossRef]
  35. Peck, C., & Stewart, K. (1985). Satisfaction with Housing and Quality of Life. Home Economics Research Journal, 13(4), 10. [CrossRef]
  36. Peng, Z.-R. (1997). The jobs-housing balance and urban commuting. Urban Studies, 34(8), 1215. [CrossRef]
  37. Ricardo, A., Frank, D., Rebecca, P., Hollie, T., & et al. (2006). Perceptions of social capital and the built environment and mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 62(12), 3072. [CrossRef]
  38. Rindfuss, R. R., Piotrowski, M., Thongthai, V., & Prasartkul, P. (2007). Measuring housing quality in the absence of a monetized real estate market. Population Studies, 61(1), 35. [CrossRef]
  39. Rouwendal, J., & Meijer, E. (2001). Preferences for housing, jobs, and commuting: A mixed logit analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 41(3), 475. [CrossRef]
  40. Sarzynski, A., Wolman, H. L., Galster, G., & Hanson, R. (2006). Testing the Conventional Wisdom about Land Use and Traffic Congestion: The More We Sprawl, the Less We Move? Urban Studies, 43(3), 26. [CrossRef]
  41. Schniederjans, M. J., Hoffman, J. J., & Sirmans, G. S. (1995). Using Goal Programming and the Analytic Hierarchy Process in House Selection. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 11(2), 167–176. [CrossRef]
  42. Sloane, D. C. (2006). Longer View: From Congestion to Sprawl: Planning and Health in Historical Context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 10–18. [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, Y. (2005). Development of neighbourhood quality of life indicators.
  44. Temkin, K., & Rohe, W. M. (1998). Social Capital and Neighborhood Stability: An Empirical Investigation. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 28. [CrossRef]
  45. Temkin, K., & Rohe, W. M. (1998). Social Capital and Neighborhood Stability: An Empirical Investigation. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 28 [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.