Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00005
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. AGC (2006) “Contractors’ Guide to BIM” The Associated General Contractors of America. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agopyan, V. et al. (1998) “Alternatives for Reducing Material Waste on Building Sites”, Research report. [Google Scholar]
  3. AIA (2007) “Integrated project delivery: a guide”, AIA California Council. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldwin, A. N. et al. (1998) “Planning building design by simulating information flow”, Automation in Construction. 8. 2. 149–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. AIA (2008), Document E202 - Building Information Modelling Protocol Exhibit, American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  6. Alin, P., Iorio, J. and Taylor, J. E. (2012). Objects as Arbitrators: Spanning Boundaries in Virtual Engineering Networks. Industry Studies Association Conference. [Google Scholar]
  7. Andoh, A. R., Su, X. and Cai, H. (2012). A boundary condition-based algorithm for locating construction site objects using RFID and GPS. Construction Research Congress 2012 [Google Scholar]
  8. Arayici, Y and Aouad, G 2010, ‘Building information modelling (BIM) for construction lifecycle management’, in: Construction and Building: Design, Materials, and Techniques, Nova Science Publishers, NY, USA. [Google Scholar]
  9. BIS/Industry Working Group (2010). Building Information Modelling and Management BIM (M): Interim Report from the BIS/Industry Working Group. London. [Google Scholar]
  10. Boeykens, S., Himpe, C. and Martens, B. (2012). “A Case Study of Using BIM in Historical Reconstruction. The Vinohrady Synagogue in Prague.” Digital Physicality Physical Digitality: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Boshyk, Y. and Dilworth, R.L. (Eds.) (2009), “Action Learning: History and Evolution”, Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  12. Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variations among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In Smart, J. C. (Ed 1), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (vol. 11, pp. 1–46). New York: Agathon Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. CIRIA (1999), “Standardisation and Pre-assembly Adding Value to Construction Projects”, Standardization; Pre-ASSEMBLY; Drivers; Benefits; Implications, London, Report 176 [Google Scholar]
  14. Coates, P. Arayici, Y. Koskela, L. Kagioglou, M. Usher, C. O’Reilly, K. (2010), “The limitations of BIM in the architectural process”, First International Conference on Sustainable Urbanism, December 2010, Hong Kong [Google Scholar]
  15. Eastman, C. Teicholz, P. Sacks, R. and Liston, K. (2008) “BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada. [Google Scholar]
  16. Edgar, A. (2007) “W15: Introduction to BIM: People, Processes and Tools”, NIBS. [Google Scholar]
  17. Environment Agency (1997) “Waste minimisation and waste management: an environmental good practice guide for industry”. Solihull. E.A. [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenwood, D. Lewis, S. and Lockley, S. (2010) Contractual issues in the total use of building information modelling. In: 18th CIB World Building Congress, Salford. [Google Scholar]
  19. GSA (2007) BIM requirements and adaptation. website: [Accessed 22/11/15] [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Huovila (2008). “Building Information Models and Innovative Sustainable housing”, In proceedings of SB08 Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 21–25 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. ISO 29481-1:2010, Building information modelling - Information delivery manual - Part 1: Methodology and format, BSI Publications. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jordani, D., (2008), “BIM: A Healthy Disruption to a Fragmented and Broken Process”, Journal of Building Information Modelling: Spring 2008, Matrix Group Publishing, Houston. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaner, I., Sacks, R., Kassian, W. and Quitt, T. (2008). “Case studies of BIM adoption for precast concrete design by mid-sized structural engineering firms.” ITcon 13 (Special Issue Case studies of BIM use): 303–323. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirkham, R. (2015) Ferry and Brandon’s Cost Planning Of Buildings (9th Edition 9), Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. ISBN: 978–1–119–96862–7. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kiviniemi, A. 2007: Support for Building Elements in the IFC 2x3 Implementations based on 3rd Certification Workshop Results. VTT, Finland. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kiviniemi, A. (2010), “Challenges of Interoperable BIM in a between organization” [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Kiviniemi (2009) “Building Information Model (BIM) promoting safety in the construction site process”, SafetyBIM – research project 10/2007 – 2/2009 (TurvaBIM in Finnish). [Google Scholar]
  28. Leicht, R., Fox, S., Mäkelainen, T. & Messner, J. (2007) “Building information models, display media and team performance: An exploratory study”, VTT Working Paper No. 88. [Google Scholar]
  29. Migilinskas et. al. (2013), The Benefits, Obstacles and Problems of Practical Bim Implementation. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Civil engineering faculty, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.097 [Google Scholar]
  30. NIBS (2008), The National Institute of Building Sciences, website: [Accessed 22/11/15] [Google Scholar]
  31. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) (2004) : Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the US Capital Facilities Industry. NIST GCR 04-867 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  32. PAS 1192-2:2013 Specification for information management for the capital/delivery phase of construction projects using building information modeling [Google Scholar]
  33. K Puckett, 2011, How members of the project team interact through BIM, CPD 2011 Module 4: Building Information Modelling,, Available from: [Accessed: 18 Dec 2015]. [Google Scholar]
  34. VTT (2007) Virtual Building Environments II Final Project Report, [Accessed at 10/11/2015] [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Yan, P. Damian (2011) Benefits and Barriers of Building Information Modelling. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.