Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00004
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600004
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. Z. A. Akasah, S. H. Shamsuddin, I. A. Rahman, M. Alias, Malaysian Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCEET 2009) Pahang, 1–5 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. M. Idris, Constr. Manage. Econ. 16, 673–679 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Moua and J. S. Russell, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 15, 46–53 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Y. L. T. Chew, S.S. Kang, K.H., J. Archit. Eng. 10, 80–87 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Booty, Facility management handbook. 2006, Oxford: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Kutut, E. K. Zavadskas, and M. Lazauskas, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 14, 287–294 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. O. Hopland, F. 33, 195–205 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Roy, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Man. 14, 4–24 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  9. Q. Shen, F. 15, 331–339 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  10. T. J. Pitt, F. 15, 97–104 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  11. O. A. Lateef, J. Build. Apprais. 5, 201–212 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Q. Shen and A. Spedding, Build. Res. Inf. 26, 169–180 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. B. M. Kamya, Research update of a typical bridge management system applied to a UK local authority, in Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life Extension. 2014, CRC Press. p. 1757–1763. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. A. Yusof, et al., Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62, 508–513 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Lavy, et al., Constr. Manage. Econ. 32, 1183–1204 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. W. J. Moore and A. G. Starr, Comput. Ind. 57, 595–606 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. U. Kumar, et al., J. Q. M. E. 19, 233–277 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. S. Mitchell, et al., Physical Asset Management Handbook. Clarion Technical Publishers (2002). [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Spedding, R. Holmes, and Q. Shen. Prioritising planned maintenance in county authorities. in International Conference on Planned Maintenance, Reliability and Quality Assurance, Cambridge, UK. (1995) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Shah Ali, J. F. M. 7, 298–306 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  21. Q. Shen, K.-K. Lo, and Q. Wang, Constr. Manage. Econ. 16, 693–702 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J. H. K. Lai, Constr. Manage. Econ. 28, 415–427 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ali and T. Hegazy, J.Perform. Constr. Facil. 28, 528–538 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. I. Flores-Colen and J. de Brito, Constr. Build. Mater. 24, 1718–1729 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. W. Rogers, F. 31, 56–67 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Taillandier, G. Sauce, and R. Bonetto, E. C. A. M. 18, 343–362 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Antti and D. Mats, J. Q. M. E. 17, 63–73 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  28. I. Flores-Colen, J. de Brito, and V. Freitas, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24, 337–344 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. M. B. Hastak, E., J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7, 67–76 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. A. A. L. Olanrewaju, B. E. P. A. M. 2, 167–181 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Hakim, C. Pierre‐Jean, and Z. Nacer Eddine, J. o. S. I. T. 14, 264–280 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Schraven, A. Hartmann, and G. Dewulf, B. E. P. A. M. 1, 61–74 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Bourne, et al., I. J. B. P. M. 5, 1–24 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  34. M. S. Valen and N. O. E. Olsson, J. F. M. 10, 287–300 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  35. T. Danny Shiem‐Shin, F. 14, 12–15 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  36. Q. Chang, et al., J. Manuf. Sci. E. 129, 661–668 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Hassanain, T. Froese, and D. Vanier, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 17, 51–64 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. N. Leveson, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 136, 17–34 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Smith and P. Stewart, S. S. 25, 24–38 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  40. A. Sadeghi and R. A. Manesh, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62, 1378–1383 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. M. A. Amir, K. P. Andrew, and G. C. Keith, F. 19, 215–222 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Bertolini and M. Bevilacqua, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 839–848 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. N. Dann, S. Hills, and D. Worthing, Constr. Manage. Econ. 24, 97–104 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. G. Carmignani, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94, 861–871 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. M. Nik Elyna, K. Syahrul Nizam, and P. Michael, J. F. M. 9, 181–199 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  46. N. Ming Yip, P. M. 19, 10–18 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  47. H. Al‐Zubaidi, P. M. 15, 173–183 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  48. R. W. Taylor, Omega 24, 217–227 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. A. W. Labib, G. B. Williams, and R. F. O’Connor, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49, 745–757 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Layzell and S. Ledbetter, Build. Res. Inf. 26, 351–357 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. I. M. Shohet, M. Puterman, and E. Gilboa,Constr. Manage. Econ. 20, 305–314 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. L. Fangxing and R. E. Brown, IEEE Trans. Power Del. on 19, 439–441 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. S. A. Oke and M. K. O. Ayomoh, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 22, 607–625 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. M. Carnero, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 945–963 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. D. M. Frangopol and M. Liu, Struct. Infrastruct. E. 3, 29–41 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. A. Chandrashekaran and B. Gopalakrishnan, J. F. M. 6, 52–68 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  57. G. Carmignani, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94, 861–871 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. E. Vijay Kumar and S. K. Chaturvedi, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 28, 109–126 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. D. Siew-Hong, K. Shahrul, and A. Ishak Abdul, J. M. T. M. 25, 415–435 (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.