Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00006
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600006
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. Bedimo-Rung, A.L., Mowen, A.J., and Cohen, D.A., The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. American journal of preventive medicine, 2005. 28(2): p. 159–168. [CrossRef]
  2. Pakzad, J., The rule of urban design. 2004, Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran.
  3. Levinson, D.M., Accessibility and the journey to work. Journal of Transport Geography, 1998. 6(1): p. 11–21. [CrossRef]
  4. Giles-Corti, B., et al., Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American journal of preventive medicine, 2005. 28(2): p. 169–176. [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, D., Brown, G., and Liu, Y., The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015. 133: p. 53–66. [CrossRef]
  6. Calthorpe, P., The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. 1993: Princeton Architectural Press.
  7. Bertolini, L. and Dijst, M., Mobility environments and network cities. Journal of urban design, 2003. 8(1): p. 27–43. [CrossRef]
  8. Truelove, M., Measurement of spatial equity. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1993. 11(1): p. 19–34.
  9. Talen, E., Measuring the public realm: A preliminary assessment of the link between public space and sense of community. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2000: p. 344–360.
  10. F.B. Erkip, The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks and recreational services in Ankara. Cities, 1997. 14(6): p. 353–361. [CrossRef]
  11. Heng, C. and V. Chan, The making of successful public space: A case study of people’s park square. Urban Design International, 2000. 5(1): p. 47–55. [CrossRef]
  12. GEDİKLİ, B., STRATEGIC SPATIAL PLANNING AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN TURKEY: ŞANLIURFA PROVINCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CASE. 2004, MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.
  13. Jacobs, J., The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Readings in Planning Theory, Fourth Edition, 2015: p. 94–109.
  14. Chiesura, A., The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and urban planning, 2004. 68(1): p. 129–138. [CrossRef]
  15. Moirongo, B.O., Urban public space patterns: human distribution and the design of sustainable city centres with reference to Nairobi CBD. Urban Design International, 2002. 7(3): p. 205–216. [CrossRef]
  16. Scopelliti, M., et al., Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016. 148: p. 139–148. [CrossRef]
  17. Masnavi, M.-R., The new millennium and the new urban paradigm: the compact city in practice. Achieving sustainable urban form, 2000: p. 64–73.
  18. Liao, F.H., S. Farber, and R. Ewing, Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis. Urban Studies, 2014: p. 0042098014527138.
  19. Williams, K., M. Jenks, and E. Burton, Achieving sustainable urban form. 2000: Taylor & Francis.
  20. Rowley, A., Planning mixed use development: issues and practice. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London, 1998.
  21. Newman, O., N.I.o.L. Enforcement, and C. Justice, Architectural design for crime prevention. 1973: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Washington, DC.
  22. Hillier, B., et al., Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: planning and design, 1993. 20(1): p. 29–66. [CrossRef]
  23. Gehl, J., Life between Buildings (Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag). 1996.
  24. Manning, R.E. and W.A. Freimund, Use of visual research methods to measure standards of quality for parks and outdoor recreation. Journal of leisure research, 2004. 36(4): p. 557.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.