Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 58, 2016
The 3rd Bali International Seminar on Science & Technology (BISSTECH 2015)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Information Technology and Information Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20165803001
Published online 23 May 2016
  1. Amaratunga, D. & Baldry, D. (2002). Sample View of Current Performance Measurement Practices in Facilities Management. Proceedings of International Postgraduate Conference, The University of Salford. [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkin, B. & Brooks, A. (2000). Total Facilities Management. London: Blackwell Science. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng, Mu. Wu., A Study on the Willingness to Use Information System of Sport Event Based on Information System Success Model, The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, Vol. 9, Num. 2, December 2013 issue [Google Scholar]
  4. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. [Google Scholar]
  5. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). Measuring e-commerce success: applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems [Google Scholar]
  6. Hinks, J. (2002). Lies, Damned Lies and KPIs: Moving Towards More Meaningful Performance Measurement for FM. In the Proceedings of Euro FM Symposium. The University of Salford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Yan, Yanqing Duan, Zetian Fu, and Philip Alford. “An empirical study on behavioural intention to reuse e-learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, N. C., Huang, H. C., & Liao, C. C. (2010). An empirical study on the use effectiveness of decision-making supportive system: combining task-technology fit and information success model. Journal of E-Business, 12(3), 407-430. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lucas, Henrt C, dan Spitler, V.K.. (1999). “Tecnology Use and Performance: A Field study of Broken Workstasions.” Decision sciences. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan C. B. (1995). Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173-187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Saeed, K. A., Hwang, Y., & Yi, M. Y. (2003). Toward an integrative framework for online consumer behavior research: a meta-analysis approach. Journal of End User Computing, 15(4), 1-26. [Google Scholar]
  12. Swan, J. E., & Trawick, I. F. (1981). Disconfirmation of expectations and satisfaction with aretail service. Journal of Retailing, 57, 40-67. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tseng, F. C. & Li, T. H. (2008). A study on evaluation of library E-Information integrated search system. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 6 (2), 111-142. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wixom, B. H. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success, MIS Quarterly 25(1), 17-41. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yeh, H. C. (1990). Management of schools ports event. National Sports Quarterly, 19(1), 22-35. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.