Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 46, 2016
2nd International Seminar for Fire Safety of Facades
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 10
Section Fire Safety Engineering
Published online 04 May 2016
  1. Mell, W.E., et al., The wildland–urban interface fire problem–current approaches and research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2010. 19(2): p. 238–251 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. NFPA, NFPA 1144 Standard for reducing structure ignition hazards from wildland fire. 2013: National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) [Google Scholar]
  3. Australian_Standard, Construction of Buildings in Bush Fire Prone Areas, in Standards Australia. 2009, Australian Standard: Australia [Google Scholar]
  4. Steen-Hansen, A., et al., What can we learn from the Lærdal fire in January 2014? Evaluation of the fire spread. (in Norwegian), in SPFR-Rapport, S.F. Research, Editor. 2014, SP Fire Research AS: Norway [Google Scholar]
  5. Steen-Hansen, A., et al., Evaluation of fire spread in the large Lærdal fire, January 2014, in Fire and Materials 2015, 14th International Conference. 2015, Interscience communications: San Francisco, USA. p. 1014–1024 [Google Scholar]
  6. PWC, Evaluation of the fires: Lærdal, Flatanger og Frøya. 2014, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) [Google Scholar]
  7. Jarnskjold, N.M.T., Brannskallsikring i tett trehusmiljø; English: Securing fire-protective envelopes in dense wooden built environments, in Department of Civil and Transport Engineering. 2015, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU): Norway [Google Scholar]
  8. Ulgenes, T. Ringve Museum Fire. 2015; Available from: [Google Scholar]
  9. Maranghides, A. and W. Mell, A case study of a community affected by the Witch and Guejito wildland fires. Fire technology, 2011. 47(2): p. 379–420 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Per Holm Nygaard, S.S., Skogbrann og hytter, - risiko og forebygging, in Byggeindustrien. 2015: [Google Scholar]
  11. Gollner, M.J., et al., Pathways for Building Fire Spread at the Wildland Urban Interface, F.P.R. Foundation, Editor. 2015, Fire Protection Research Foundation; National Fire Protection Association NFPA: QUINCY, MASSACHUSETTS, U.S.A [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen, J.D. Reducing the wildland fire threat to homes: where and how much? in Proceedings of the symposium on fire economics, planning, and policy: bottom lines. 1999. San Diego, California, U.S.A [Google Scholar]
  13. Howard, R.A., Decision Analysis of Fire Protection Strategy for the Santa Monica Mountains: An Initial Assessment: Preliminary Report. 1973: Stanford Research Institute [Google Scholar]
  14. Maranghides, A. and W.E. Mell, Framework for Addressing the National Wildland Urban Interface Fire Problem-Determining Fire and Ember Exposure Zones Using a WUI Hazard Scale. 2012: US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology [Google Scholar]
  15. Manzello, S.L., S. Suzuki, and Y. Hayashi, Enabling the study of structure vulnerabilities to ignition from wind driven firebrand showers: A summary of experimental results. Fire Safety Journal, 2012. 54: p. 181–196 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hakkarainen, T. and T. Oksanen, Fire safety assessment of wooden facades. Fire and Materials, 2002. 26(1): p. 7–27 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. CBSC, California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 7A, I.C.C. California, Editor. 2013, California Building Standard Commission [Google Scholar]
  18. Colwell, S. and T. Baker, Fire performance of external thermal insulation for walls of multistorey buildings: (BR 135) Third edition. Building Research Establishment Report BR135, ed. B. Trust. 2013: BRE publications [Google Scholar]
  19. Puntabyrgi, P., Pilot project-passive exterior fire protection of small church, P. 1, Editor. 2015, Lervike AS [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Wagner, C.E., Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Forestry Technical Report. 1987, Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Forestry Service [Google Scholar]
  21. Vicars, M. and J. Luckhurst, Firesmart: Protecting your community from wildfire. Second edition ed. 2003, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Partners in Protection [Google Scholar]
  22. NFPA, Firewise Toolkit. A guide to Firewise principles, N.f.p.a.N. Firewise communities, Editor. Undated [Google Scholar]
  23. Vicars, M. and J. Luckhurst, Firesmart: protecting your community from wildfire. Partners in Protection. Edmonton, Alberta, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  24. Maranghides, A., et al., A Case Study of a Community Affected by the Witch and Guejito Fires: Report #2–Evaluating the Effects of Hazard Mitigation Actions on Structure Ignitions. 2013, Natianal Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [Google Scholar]
  25. Teague, B., R. McLeod, and S. Pascoe, Final report, 2009 Victorian bushfires royal commission. Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne Victoria, Australia, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  26. Watts, J. Criteria for fire risk ranking. in Fire Safety Science-Proceedings of the Second International Symposium. 1991. Tokyo, Japan: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation [Google Scholar]
  27. Karlsson, B., Fire Risk Index Method - Multistorey Apartment Buildings, FRIM-MAB Version 2.0. Report P0212053, Trätek AB, Stockholm, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 1990. 48(1): p. 9–26 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. FIRE, C., California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map Update Project, T.C.D.o.F.a.F. Protection, Editor. 2007, CAL FIRE: [Google Scholar]
  30. Keane, R.E., et al., A method for mapping fire hazard and risk across multiple scales and its application in fire management. Ecological Modelling, 2010. 221(1): p. 2–18 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lampin-Maillet, C., et al., Mapping wildland-urban interfaces at large scales integrating housing density and vegetation aggregation for fire prevention in the South of France. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010. 91(3): p. 732–741 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Developers, G., Heatmap Layer. Google: [Google Scholar]
  33. ASTM. New ASTM Standards Aim to Help with Building Facade Inspections, Including Drone Use. 2016 [cited 2016 08.01.2016] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.