Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 38, 2016
UTP-UMP Symposium on Energy Systems 2015 (SES 2015)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Thermal Engineering & Energy Conversion
Published online 11 January 2016
  1. S. Crampin and S. Peacock, “A review of shearwave splitting in the compliant crack-critical anisotropic Earth,” Wave Motion, 41, 59–77, (2005). [CrossRef]
  2. R. Bale, B. Gratacos, B. Mattocks, S. Roche, K. Poplavskii, and X. Li, “Shear wave splitting applications for fracture analysis and improved imaging: Some onshore examples,” first break, 27, (2009).
  3. S. Crampin and S. Peacock, “A review of the current understanding of seismic shear-wave splitting in the Earth’s crust and common fallacies in interpretation,” Wave motion, 45, 675–722, (2008). [CrossRef]
  4. C. M. Keith and S. Crampin, “Seismic body waves in anisotropic media: reflection and refraction at a plane interface,” Geophys. J. Int, 49, 181–208, (1977). [CrossRef]
  5. M. Ando, Y. Ishikawa, and F. Yamazaki, “Shear wave polarization anisotropy in the upper mantle beneath Honshu, Japan,” J. Geophys. Res: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 88, 5850–5864, (1983). [CrossRef]
  6. L. Vinnik, J. P. Montagner, N. Girardin, I. Dricker, and J. Saul, “Comment on “Shear‐wave splitting to test mantle deformation models around Hawaii” by Kristoffer T. Walker, Götz HR Bokelmann, and Simon L. Klemperer,” Geophys. Res. Lett, 30, (2003). [CrossRef]
  7. Y. Fukao, “Evidence from core-reflected shear waves for anisotropy in the Earth’s mantle,” (1984).
  8. P. G. Silver and W. W. Chan, “Implications for continental structure and evolution from seismic anisotropy,” (1988).
  9. S. Crampin and Y. Gao, “A review of techniques for measuring shear-wave splitting above small earthquakes,” Phys. Earth. Planet. In, 159, 1–14, (2006). [CrossRef]
  10. S. Crampin and D. W. King, “Evidence for anisotropy in the upper mantle beneath Eurasia from the polarization of higher mode seismic surface waves,” Geophys. J. Int, 49, 59–85, (1977). [CrossRef]
  11. M. Ando, Y. Ishikawa, and H. Wada, “S-wave anisotropy in the upper mantle under a volcanic area in Japan,” (1980).
  12. P. Bernard and A. Zollo, “Inversion of near-source S polarization for parameters of double-couple point sources,” B. Seismol. Soc. Am, 79, 1779–1809, (1989).
  13. J. E. Vidale, “Complex polarization analysis of particle motion,” B. Seismol. Soc. Am, 76, 1393–1405, (1986).
  14. Y. Gao, P. Hao, and S. Crampin, “SWAS: A shear-wave analysis system for semi-automatic measurement of shear-wave splitting above small earthquakes,” Phys. Earth. Planet. In, 159, 71–89, (2006). [CrossRef]
  15. X. R. Shih, R. P. Meyer, and J. F. Schneider, “An automated, analytical method to determine shear-wave splitting,” Tectonophysics, 165, 271–278, (1989). [CrossRef]
  16. R. C. Aster, P. M. Shearer, and J. Berger, “Quantitative measurements of shear wave polarizations at the Anza seismic network, southern California: Implications for shear wave splitting and earthquake prediction,” J. Geophys. Res: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 95, 12449–12473, (1990). [CrossRef]
  17. P. G. Silver and W. W. Chan, “Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation,” J. Geophys. Res: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 96, 16429–16454, (1991). [CrossRef]
  18. N. Teanby, J.-M. Kendall, and M. Van der Baan, “Automation of shear-wave splitting measurements using cluster analysis,” B. Seismol. Soc. Am, 94, 453–463, (2004). [CrossRef]
  19. C.-F. Shieh, “Estimation of shear-wave splitting time using orthogonal transformation,” Geophysics, 62, 657–661, (1997). [CrossRef]
  20. H. Dai and C. MacBeth, “Split shear-wave analysis using an artificial neural network,” First Break, vol. 12, 605–613, 1994.
  21. F. Colonna, G. Easley, K. Guo, and D. Labate, “Radon transform inversion using the shearlet representation,” Acha, 29, 232–250, Sep (2010).
  22. S. R. Deans, The Radon transform and some of its applications: Courier Corporation, (2007).
  23. Y. J. Gu and M. Sacchi, “Radon transform methods and their applications in mapping mantle reflectivity structure,” Surv. Geophys, 30, 327–354, (2009). [CrossRef]
  24. Y. Luo, J. Xia, R. D. Miller, Y. Xu, J. Liu, and Q. Liu, “Rayleigh-wave dispersive energy imaging using a high-resolution linear Radon transform,” Pure. Appl. Geophys, 165, 903–922, May (2008). [CrossRef]
  25. C. Cosma, Vertical and Horizontal Seismic Profiling Investigations at Olkiluoto, 2001: Posiva, (2003).
  26. J. Blackburn, J. Daniels, S. Dingwall, G. Hampden-Smith, S. Leaney, J. Le Calvez, et al., “Borehole Seismic Surveys: Beyond the Vertical Profile,” Journal Oil Field Review, Schlumberger, 15, 15, (2007).
  27. M. Nejati and H. Hashemi, “Migrated Exploding Reflectors in Evaluation of Finite Difference Solution for Inhomogeneous Seismic Models,” (2012).
  28. C. Sayers and S. Chopra, “Introduction to this special section: Seismic modeling,” The Leading Edge, 28, 528–529, (2009). [CrossRef]
  29. Z. Yao and G. F. Margrave, “Elastic wavefield modelling in 3D by fourth-order staggered-grid finite difference technique.”
  30. R. Clayton and B. Engquist, “Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations,” B. Seismol. Soc. Am, 67, 1529–1540, (1977).
  31. F. Collino and C. Tsogka, “Application of the perfectly matched absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media,” Geophysics, vol. 66, pp. 294–307, January 1, 2001 2001. [CrossRef]
  32. B. Engquist and A. Majda (1979). Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical solution of waves, Math. Comp. (in press).
  33. Z. Cao, “Analysis and application of the Radon transform,” in Masters Abstracts International, (2007).
  34. R. H. Stolt and A. B. Weglein., Seismic Imaging and Inversion: Cambridge University Press, (2012).
  35. A. Gholamy and V. Kreinovich, “Why Ricker wavelets are successful in processing seismic data: Towards a theoretical explanation,” in CIES, 2014, IEEE Symposium on, 11–16 (2014)

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.