Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 25, 2015
2015 International Conference on Energy, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering (EMME 2015)
Article Number 02010
Number of page(s) 6
Section Materials Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20152502010
Published online 06 October 2015
  1. Coufal H. et al. 2000. Holographic Data Storage. New York: Springer-Verlag. [CrossRef]
  2. Fernández E. et al. 2008. Multiplexed holographic data page storage on a polyvinyl alcohol/acrylamide photo-polymer memory. Appl. Opt. 47:4448–4456. [CrossRef]
  3. Steckman G. et al. 1998. Characterization of phenanthrenequinone-doped poly(methyl methacrylate) for holographic memory. Opt. Lett. 23:1310–1312. [CrossRef]
  4. Lin S. et al. 2000. Phenanthrenequinone-doped poly(methyl methacrylate) photopolymer bulk for volume holographic data storage. Opt. Lett. 25:451–453. [CrossRef]
  5. Matusevich V. et al. 2008. Holographic volume absorption grating in glass-like polymer recording material. Opt. Express 16:1552–1558. [CrossRef]
  6. Luo Y. et al. 2008. Optimization of multiplexed holo-graphic gratings in PQ-PMMA for spectral-spatial imaging filters. Opt. Lett. 33:566–568. [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao C. et al. 1997. Shrinkage-corrected volume holograms based on photopolymeric phase media for surface-normal optical interconnects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71:1464–1466. [CrossRef]
  8. Chen J.H. et al. 2002. Shrinkage and refractive-index shift-corrected volume holograms for optical interconnects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81:1387–1389. [CrossRef]
  9. Dhar L. et al. 1998. Temperature-induced changes in photopolymer volume holograms. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73:1337–1339. [CrossRef]
  10. Pandey N. et al. 2008. Technique for characterization of dimensional changes in slanted holographic gratings by monitoring the angular selectivity profile. Opt. Lett. 33:1981–1983. [CrossRef]
  11. Gallo J & Verber C. 1994. Model for the effects of material shrinkage on volume holograms. Appl. Opt. 33:6797–6800. [CrossRef]
  12. Hsieh M & Hsu K. 2001. Grating detuning effect on holographic memory in photopolymers. Opt. Eng. 40:2125–2133. [CrossRef]
  13. Wu S & Glytsis E. 2004. Characteristics of DuPont photopolymers for slanted holographic grating formations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21:1722–1731. [CrossRef]
  14. Sheridan J & Lawrence J. 2000. Non-local response diffusion model of holographic recording in photopolymer. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17:1108–1114. [CrossRef]
  15. Tolstik E. et al. 2008. Non-local response in glass-like polymer storage materials based on poly (methyl-methacrylate) with distributed phenanthrenequinone. Opt. Express 16:11253–11258. [CrossRef]
  16. Moreau V. et al. 2002. Characteristics of DuPont photo-polymer: determination of kinetic parameters in a diffusion model. Appl. Opt. 41:3427–3435. [CrossRef]
  17. Fernandez-Pousa C. et al. 2000. Holographic determination of the irradiance dependence of linear-chain polymerization rates in photopolymer dry films. Appl. Phys. B 70:537–542. [CrossRef]
  18. Liu H. et al. 2009. Characteristics of holographic scattering and its application in determining kinetic parameters in PQ-PMMA photopolymer. Appl. Phys. B 95:513–518. [CrossRef]
  19. Wu S & Glytsis E. 2003. Holographic grating formation in photopolymers: analysis and experimental results based on a nonlocal diffusion model and rigorous coupled-wave analysis. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20:1177–1188. [CrossRef]
  20. Popov A. et al. 2000. Spectrally selective holographic optical elements based on a thick polymer medium with diffusional amplification. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2:494–499. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.