Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 22, 2015
International Conference on Engineering Technology and Application (ICETA 2015)
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 8
Section Information and Communication Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20152201018
Published online 09 July 2015
  1. Yan Jiaqiong. 2010. Elementary analysis on the layout scheme in network page design. Computer Study, 2: 41–44.
  2. Luo Shijian, Zhu Shangshang. 2010. User Experience and Product Innovation Design. Beijing: China Machine Press, pp: 170–172.
  3. Altaboli, A., & Lin, Y. 2011. Objective and subjective measures of visual aesthetics of website interface design: the two sides of the coin. In Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp: 35–44. [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, N., & Bhattacharya, S. (2010, December). A GA-based approach to improve web page aesthetics. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Technologies and Multimedia. ACM. pp: 29–32.
  5. Teng Hong, Wang Zhengdong, Tu Shandong, et al. 2008. Experimental study on layout design for general interface in process plant for process plants. Machine Design and Research, 24 (5):79–82+87.
  6. Wang Miaohui. 2011. Study on design of visual information interface based on visual cognition. Packaging Engineering, 32 (8):49–51+55.
  7. Zhao Naidi. 2012. Webpage Layout Influence over Visual Search Efficiency with Eye Movement Technology. Shanghai: Fudan University,
  8. Li Ting. 2012. Eye Control Interface Design and Case Development. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University.
  9. Li Leshan. 2004. Human-Computer Interface Design. Beijing: Science Press, pp: 91.
  10. Cheng Shiwei, Sun Zhiqiang. 2014. An approach to eye tracking for mobile device based interaction. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics. (8): 1354–1361.
  11. Jin Xiaoping, Qiu Ying, Mao Rongen, et al. 2008. Human-research on driving computer interface layout design reasoning system. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 39(4): 183–186.
  12. Wang Haiyan, Bian Ting, Xue Chengqi. 2011. Layout design of display interface for a new generation fighter. Electro–Mechanical Engineering, 27(4): 57–61.
  13. Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Herder, E., & Mayer, M. 2008. Not quite the average: An empirical study of Web use. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 2(1): 5.
  14. Byström, K., Limberg, L., Pejtersen, A. M., Pharo, N., Sundin, O., Belkin, N., & Kuhlthau, C. 2004. Conceptions of task as a methodological issue: Scandinavians on information seeking and retrieval research (SIG USE). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1): 577–579.
  15. Williams, M. E. 1979. Annual review of information science and technology.
  16. Campbell, D. J. 1988. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of management review, 13(1): 40–52.
  17. Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. 2009. Social navigation support for information seeking: If you build it, will they come?. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp: 66–77. [CrossRef]
  18. Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. 2010. How the interface design influences users’ spontaneous trustworthiness evaluations of web search results: comparing a list and a grid interface. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications. ACM. pp: 299–306

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.