Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 15, 2014
Building Surveying, Facilities Management and Engineering Conference (BSFMEC 2014)
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141501018
Published online 19 August 2014
  1. F. I. Khan, R. Sadiq and M. M. Haddara, “Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance (RBIM): Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Aggregative Risk Analysis,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 82, pp. 398–411, 11, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Cigolini, L. Fedele, M. Garetti and M. Macchi, “Recent advances in maintenance and facility management,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 19, pp. 279–286, 06/01; 2012/09, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. S. Gahlot and S. Sharma, Building Repair and Maintenance Management. India: CBS Publisher, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Belov and A. Veselov, “Mechanics of Corroded Flexible Reinforced-Concrete Elements,” World Applied Science Journal (WASJ), vol. 23, pp. 197–202, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Behrooyan, H. Razaghi and S. A. Alavi, “Strenght and Ductility in Retrofitted URM Walls by GFRP and CFRP,” World Applied Science Journal (WASJ), vol. 18, pp. 554–558, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. I. Merkulov, R. V. Lesovic, A. A. Metrohin and N. V. Kalashnikov, “Development of Theory of Safety for Structural Building and Construction,” World Applied Science Journal (WASJ), vol. 31, pp. 531–533, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. A. Zargaryun and V. I. Finaev, “Multicriteria Decision Making in Case of Incomplete Source of Date,” World Applied Science Journal (WASJ), vol. 23, pp. 1253-1261, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. M. Frangopol and M. Liu, “Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost∗,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 29–41, 03/01; 2012/09, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. A. Izvekov, V. V. Dubrobsky and E. Y. Hamutskikh, “Mathematical Modeling and Calculation of Accuracy and Durability of Mecahnical Systems’ Elements,” World Applied Science Journal, vol. 30, pp. 32–34, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Douglas and B. Ransom, Understanding Building Failure. Taylor and Francis London, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. M. Niari, I. Ranjbar and M. Rashidi, “Predicting of Repair and Maintenance Cost of John Deere 4955 Tractors in Ardabil Province, Iran,” World Applied Science Journal, vol. 19, pp. 1412–1416, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Ducjuk and A. Grimitlin, “Aeration of Industrial Buildings,” World Applied Science Journal (WASJ), vol. 23, pp. 50–54, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. B. Petrovsky and V. N. Lovanov, “Selection of Complex System in the Reduced Multiple Criteria Space,” World Applied Science Journal (WASJ), vol. 29, pp. 1315–1319, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Saaty L., Decision Making with Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. USA: Springer Science Business Media, LLC, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Arif, M. S. Salit, N. Ismail and Y. Nukman, “Use of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) For Selecting the best Design Concept,” Jurnal Teknologi, vol. 49, pp. 1–18, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. C. Márquez, “Maintenance Management Characterization: Process, Framework and Supporting Pillars,” pp. 11–40, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Dalalah, F. Al-Oqba and M. Hayajmeh, “Application of the Analystic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Mult-Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Cranes,” JJME, Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 567–578, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Saaty L., Fundametal of Decision Making and Priority Setting Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publication, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. Z. Li, C. Leung and Y. Xi, Structural Renovation in Concrete. USA and Canada: Spoons Press, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Straub, “Dutch standard for condition assessment of buildings,” Structural Survey, vol. 27, pp. 23–35, 2009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.