Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 15, 2014
Building Surveying, Facilities Management and Engineering Conference (BSFMEC 2014)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141501004
Published online 19 August 2014
  1. A. H. Nawawi and N. Khalil, “Performance Analysis of Government and Public Buildings via Post Occupancy Evaluation,” J. Build. Apprais., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 59–69, 2008. [CrossRef]
  2. J. Douglas, “Building performance and its relevance to facilities management,” Facilities, vol. 14, no. April, pp. 23–32, 1996. [CrossRef]
  3. G. Mcdougall, J. R. Kelly, J. Hinks, and U. S. Bititci, “A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings,” J. Facil. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 142–153, 2002. [CrossRef]
  4. D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, “Appraising the total performance of higher education buildings: A participator y approach towards a knowledge- base system,” in Construction and Building Research Conference 1998: Proceedings (COBRA) 2nd-3rd September 1998, Oxford Brookes University, 1998, pp. 1–17.
  5. S. Parmjit, Y. F. Chan, and K. S. Gurnam, A comprehensive guide to writing a research proposal. Venton Publishing, Batu Caves, Malaysia, 2006.
  6. D. Pati, C.-S. Park, and G. Augenbroe, “Roles of building performance assessment in stakeholder dialogue in AEC,” Autom. Constr., vol. 15, pp. 415–427, Jul. 2006. [CrossRef]
  7. R. J. Cole, “Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 1998. [CrossRef]
  8. N. Almeida, V. Sousa, L. Alves Dias, and F. Branco, “A framework for combining riskmanagement and performance-based building approaches,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 157–174, Apr. 2010. [CrossRef]
  9. B. William, “What is Performance?,” Perform. Manag., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 190–91, 1993.
  10. D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, “A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance,” Prop. Manag., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 171–189, 2003.
  11. M. Abaza, “Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment High Performance Buildings Using Whole Building Integrated Design Approach,” Strateg. Plan. Energy Environ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 19–34, 2012. [CrossRef]
  12. J. Eley, “How do post-occupancy evaluation and the facilities manager meet ?,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 164–167, 2001. [CrossRef]
  13. M. Clift and R. Butler, “The Performance and Cost-in use of Buildings: A New Approach,” UK, 1995.
  14. J. E. Woods, “Expanding the Principles of Performance to Sustainable Buildings,” Real Estate Issues, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 37–46, 2008.
  15. A. Haapio and P. Viitaniemi, “A critical review of building environmental assessment tools,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 469–482, Oct. 2008. [CrossRef]
  16. W. F. E. Preiser, H. Z. Rabinowits, and E. T. White, Post Occupancy Evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company CRS Sirrine Houston, TX, 1988.
  17. W. F. E. Preiser and J. L. Nasar, “Assessing Building Performance: Its Evolution From Post-Occupancy Evaluation,” Archnet-IJAR, Int. J. Archit. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 84–99, 2008.
  18. D. Amaratunga, “Assessment of facilities management performance,” Prop. Manag., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 258–266, 2000.
  19. W. F. E. Preiser, “Feedback, feedforward and control: post-occupancy evaluation to the rescue,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 456–459, 2001. [CrossRef]
  20. B. Bordass and A. Leaman, “Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 347–352, Jul. 2005. [CrossRef]
  21. B. Bordass, R. Cohen, M. Standeven, and A. Leaman, “Assessing building performance in use 2: technical performance of the Probe buildings,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 103–113, Mar. 2001. [CrossRef]
  22. B. Bordass and A. Leaman, “Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 3: Case studies of the use of techniques in the feedback portfolio,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 361–375, Jul. 2005. [CrossRef]
  23. M. Pitt and M. Tucker, “Performance measurement in facilities management: driving innovation?,” Prop. Manag., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 241–254, 2008.
  24. G. Baird, “Incorporating User Performance Criteria into Building Sustainability Rating Tools (BSRTs) for Buildings in Operation,” Sustainability, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1069–1086, Nov. 2009. [CrossRef]
  25. G. Augenbroe and C.-S. Park, “Quantification methods of technical building performance,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 159–172, Mar. 2005. [CrossRef]
  26. D. Pati, C.-S. Park, and G. Augenbroe, “Roles of quantified expressions of building performance assessment in facility procurement and management,” Build. Environ., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 773–784, Apr. 2009. [CrossRef]
  27. T. Lützkendorf and T. M. Speer, “Alleviating asymmetric information in property markets: building performance and product quality as signals for consumers,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 182–195, Mar. 2005. [CrossRef]
  28. T. Lützkendorf and D. P. Lorenz, “Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 334–356, Jul. 2006. [CrossRef]
  29. J. C. Vischer, Chapter 3: Post Occupancy Evaluation: A Multifaced Tool for Building mprovement. United States of America: Federal Facilities Council, The National Academy Press, 2002, pp. 23–34.
  30. J. C. Vischer, “Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 231–240, Jun. 2008. [CrossRef]
  31. B. Bordass, “Learning more from our buildings - or just forgetting less ?,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 406–411, 2003. [CrossRef]
  32. B. Bordass, A. Leaman, and P. Ruyssevelt, “Assessing building performance in use 5: conclusions and implications,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 144–157, Mar. 2001. [CrossRef]
  33. R. Cohen, M. Standeven, A. Leaman, and B. Bordass, “Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 85–102, 2001. [CrossRef]
  34. G. Nevill, “So how are you doing?,” Build. Serv. - CIBSE J., no. November, pp. 32–37, 2007.
  35. V. I. Soebarto and T. J. Williamson, “Multi-criteria assessment of building performance: theory and implementation,” Build. Environ., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 681–690, Jul. 2001. [CrossRef]
  36. K. Alexander, Facilities management: theory and practice. London: E & FN Spon, 1996. [CrossRef]
  37. A. Leaman, F. Stevenson, and B. Bordass, “Building evaluation: practice and principles,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 564–577, Oct. 2010. [CrossRef]
  38. A. Zimmerman and M. Martin, “Post-occupancy evaluation: benefits and barriers,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 168–174, Mar. 2001. [CrossRef]
  39. J. Sinopoli, “How Do We Measure The Performance Of A Building ?,” Smart Buildings LLC, 2009.
  40. M. Way and B. Bordass, “Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 2: Soft landings – involving design and building teams in improving performance,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 353–360, Jul. 2005. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.