Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 408, 2025
44th Conference of the International Deep Drawing Research Group (IDDRG 2025)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02003 | |
Number of page(s) | 2 | |
Section | Technical Notes | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202540802003 | |
Published online | 07 May 2025 |
Quantifying the amount of restraining due to friction in the different areas of drawing tools: A numerical analysis
1
Mondragon Unibertsitatea,
Loramendi 4, Mondragon,
20500
Gipuzkoa, Spain
2
Autoform Engineering S L,
Carrer de Joan d'Àustria, 116,
08018
Barcelona, Spain
* Corresponding author: esaenzdeargan@mondragon.edu
It is nowadays well known that depending on the tool surface topography, sheet surface topography, lubricant nature and amount, and process variables a wide range of coefficient of friction (COF) values coexist in the very same drawing operation. Furthermore, and as shown in a previous publication of the research group, the tool finishing is not homogeneous and different roughness values are observed in industrial tooling. So the question that arrives in this situation is what areas of the tool have a greater impact in the material restraining and therefore more efforts should be applied when polishing them. The present work numerically analyses three industrial drawing operations of big automotive components. A classification of the different areas of the tool is carried out and friction is activated and deactivated in different numerical simulations. A comparison in terms of draw in, material formability (based on FLD), major strain and thinning is carried out. As a result, a classification of the tool areas that most impact have in the restraining of the material is carried out.
Key words: Tool roughness / coefficient of friction / draw in / forming limit diagram
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.