Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 308, 2020
2019 8th International Conference on Transportation and Traffic Engineering (ICTTE 2019)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 03007 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Road Safety and Risk Management | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202030803007 | |
Published online | 12 February 2020 |
Travel decision reversals paradox of competitive metro lines: The Equate-to-differentiate Theory Interpretation
School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, 999 Xian Road, Chengdu 611756, PRC
a Corresponding author: xia.luo@263.cn
Based on the equate-to-differentiate theory, this paper studies the paradox of preference reversal and choice reversal in traffic decision-making in parallel sections of Chengdu Metro Line No.2 and No.4. Travel decision reversals: preference reversals phenomenon (PRP) and choice reversals phenomenon (CRP) are found in the travel investigation for Chengdu Metro Line No.2 and No.4, and the reversals cannot be well explained by random error. Through experimental design of cautious control, the existence of these phenomena is confirmed. This paper establishes the judgment dimension system of option attributes, and designs three groups of psychological experiment in certain, uncertain and risk scenarios. Data analysis shows that PRP and CRP can be explained by the equate-to-differentiate interpretation. The phenomena of reversal are not due to the fact that preference and choice really reverses, but the variable strategic process. The equate-to-differentiate interpretation shows good consistency in the experiments and can predict and explain the preference and choice reversal of travel decision. At last, a comparative analysis which compares the results of the two models of the decision field theory is made and finally the conclusion is obtained.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.