MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 303, 20192019 3rd International Conference on Building Materials and Materials Engineering (ICBMM 2019)
|Number of page(s)||6|
|Published online||12 December 2019|
Comparison Study on Hygric Performance of Bamboo Laminated Lumber and Bamboo Scrimber as Indoor Finishing in Hot-Humid Climate Region
1 School of architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, Guangzhou 510640, China
a Corresponding author: firstname.lastname@example.org
Bamboo laminated lumber (BSB) and bamboo scrimber (BFB) are two most typical products in bamboo-based panel industry, which are widely used as building indoor finishing. The study aims to clarify the difference between BSB and BFB, in terms of the material property and the construction performance. Material tests including two items for basic properties and four for hygric properties were first carried out, and the results showed that under the influence of bamboo-based panel processing technology, BFB had significantly higher bulk density and lower open porosity, lower moisture storage as well as lower moisture transport properties than BSB. Based on the material parameters, exterior walls construction groups were set in the computer program WUFI Plus with a typical city in North America Hot-Humid climate region as external condition. The annual simulation of coupled heat and moisture process for the construction groups showed that BSB performed better in exhausting the moisture inside the construction, and strengthening the regulating effect on the indoor hygric environment. However, vapor barrier was suggested to be arranged in the upstream side of the moisture flow to avoid its hygric resistance disadvantage.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.