EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 411 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 411 (2025) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 411, 2025
Joint 14th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM2024) and 5th Zaytoonah Engineering Conference (ZEC2024)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 11
Section Project Management, Organizational, and Safety Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541103002
Published online 05 September 2025
  1. Lu, Y., Yin, L., Deng, Y., Wu, G., & Li, C. (2023). Using cased based reasoning for automated safety risk management in construction industry. Safety Science, 106113. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106113 [Google Scholar]
  2. Boadu, E.F., Sunindijo, R.Y., Wang, C.C. and Frimpong, S., 2023. Factors constraining the promotion of health and safety in public works procurement in developing countries. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(9), pp. 1611-1621. [Google Scholar]
  3. Umeokafor, N., Evangelinos, K. And Windapo, A., 2020. Implications and opportunities in a complex construction health and safety regulatory environment. In construction health and safety in developing countries (pp. 15-28). Routledge [Google Scholar]
  4. Mamman, E.J., Okigbo, N.O. and Oke, A.A., 2022. Evaluation of occupational safety risk factors in building construction projects. Journal of applied ecology and environmental design, 22(4), pp.165-174. [Google Scholar]
  5. Okudan, O., Budayan, C. And Dikmen, I., 2021. A knowledge-based Risk Management tool for construction projects using case-based reasoning. Expert systems with applications, 173, p.114776. [Google Scholar]
  6. Emuze, F. (2023). An Illustrative Case Study of Workaround and Its Effects on Construction Site Safety in South Africa. Proceedings of the 39th Annual ARCOM Conference (pp. 247-256). Leeds, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management. [Google Scholar]
  7. Soffer, P., Outmazgin, N., Hadar, I. and Tzafrir, S., 2023. Why work around the process? Analyzing workarounds through the lens of the theory of planned behavior. Business & information systems engineering, 65(4), pp.369-389. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dekker, S. (2019). Foundations of Safety Science: A Century of Understanding Accidents and Disasters. (1, Ed.) New York, US: London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dallasega, P., Revolti, A., Schulze, F. And Martinelli, M., 2021. Augmented reality to increase efficiency of mep construction: a case study. In isarc. Proceedings of the international symposium on automation and robotics in construction (vol. 38, pp. 459466). [Google Scholar]
  10. Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., & Li, R. Y. (2022). Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(45). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/ioitmc8010045. [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Brien, W. J. (2017). Fiatech: The Next Generation of the Capital Projects Technology Roadmap. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(9). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001369. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shrestha, S., 2020. Occupational hazards in building construction. Scitech Nepal, 15(1), pp.16-21. [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo, K. And Zhang, I., 2022. Multi-objective optimization for improved project management: current status and future directions. Automation in construction, 139, p.104256. [Google Scholar]
  14. Famakin, I.O., Aigbavboa, C. and Molusiwa, R., 2023. Exploring challenges to implementing health and safety regulations in a developing economy. International journal of construction management, 23(1), pp.89-97. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mir M. S. and Khan, A. (2021) Health hazards and risks in construction workers of kashmir valley. Archives of life science and nutritional research article. [Google Scholar]
  16. Obondi, K., 2022. The utilization of project risk monitoring and control practices and their relationship with project success in construction projects. Journal of project management, 7(1), pp.35-52. [Google Scholar]
  17. Osei-Kyei, R., Narbaev, T. And Ampratwum, G., 2022. A Scientometric analysis of studies on Risk Management in construction projects. Buildings, 12(9), p.1342. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ershadi, M.J., Edrisabadi, R. And Shakouri, A., 2020. Strategic alignment of project management with health, safety, and environmental management. Built environment project and asset management, 10(1), pp.78-93. [Google Scholar]
  19. Salguero-Caparrös, F., Pardo-Ferreira, M.C. Martinez-Rojas, M., Rubio-Romero J.C. Salvador, J., Bhatt, S., Fowler, R., Ritz, J., James, R., Jacobsohn, V., Brakey, H.R. and Sussman, A.L., 2019. Engagement with project echo to increase medication-assisted treatment in rural primary care. Psychiatric services, 70(12), pp. 1157-1160. [Google Scholar]
  20. Othman, I., Kamil, M., Sunindijo, R.Y., Alnsour, M. And Kineber, A.F., 2020, April. Critical success factors influencing construction safety program implementation in developing countries. In journal of physics: conference series (vol. 1529, no. 4, p. 042079). Iop publishing. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shaikh, A.Y., Osei-Kyei, R., Hardie, M. And Stevens, M., 2023. Review of drivers of teamwork for construction health and safety. International journal of building pathology and adaptation. [Google Scholar]
  22. Blanc, F., Ottimofiore, G. And Myers, K., 2022. From Osh regulation to safety results: Using Behavioral insights and a "supply chain" approach to improve outcomes-the experience of the health and safety executive. Safety science, 145, p.105491. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bayraktar, O.Y., 2020. Risk management in construction sector. World journal of advanced research and reviews, 8(2), pp.237-243. [Google Scholar]
  24. Selleck, R., Hassall, M. And Cattani, M., 2022. Determining the reliability of critical controls in construction projects. Safety, 8(3), p.64. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ostad-Ali-Askari, K., 2022. Management of risks substances and sustainable development. Applied water science, 12(4), p.65. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fang, W., Ma, W., Ma, L., Love, P. E., Luo, H., Ding, L., & Zhou, A. (2020). Knowledge graph for identifying hazards on construction sites: Integrating computer vision with ontology. Automation in Construction, 119. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103310. [Google Scholar]
  27. Alter, S, 2014. Theory of workarounds. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34, pp-pp. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03455. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wibisono, A., Sammon, D. and Heavin, C., 2022. Opening the workaround black box: an organisational routines perspective. Journal of Decision Systems, 31(sup1), pp.270281. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dennerlein, J.T., Eyllon, M., Garverich, S., Weinstein, D., Manjourides, J., Vallas, S.P. and Lincoln, A.K., 2021. Associations between work-related factors and psychological distress among construction workers. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 63(12), pp.1052-1057. [Google Scholar]
  30. Weinzierl, S., Wolf, V., Pauli, T., Beverungen, D. And Matzner, M., 2022. Detecting temporal workarounds in business processes-a deep-learning-based method for analysing event log data. Journal of business analytics, 5(1), pp.76-100. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kassem, M., Khoiry, M.A. and Hamzah, N., 2021. Theoretical review on critical risk factors in oil and gas construction projects in yemen. Engineering, construction, and architectural management, 28(4), pp.934-968. [Google Scholar]
  32. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar]
  33. Abioye, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Akanbi, L., Ajayi, A., Delgado, J. M., Bilal, M., ... Ahmed, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. Journal of Building Engineering, 44. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/i.iobe.2021.103299 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.