Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
Article Number 05004
Number of page(s) 12
Section Structural and Functional Performance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440305004
Published online 16 September 2024
  1. European Environment Agency (EEA), Greenhouse gas emissions from energy use in buildings in Europe (2021). Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-energy/assessment [Google Scholar]
  2. European Environment Agency (EEA), Greenhouse gas emissions from energy use in buildings in Europe, (2023). Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-energy-6 [Google Scholar]
  3. European Environment Agency (EEA), The European environment – State and outlook 2010 – Material resources and waste, 2012 update, (2012). https://doi.org/10.2800/46022 [Google Scholar]
  4. N. H. Ramli Sulong, S. A. S. Mustapa, and M. K. Abdul Rashid, Application of expanded polystyrene (EPS) in buildings and constructions: A review, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 136, no. 20, pp. 1–11, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47529 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Arun Solomon and G. Hemalatha, Characteristics of expanded polystyrene (EPS) and its impact on mechanical and thermal performance of insulated concrete form (ICF) system, Structures, vol. 23, no. October 2019, pp. 204–213, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.10.019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Jasim Mohammed and O. A. Khaleefah, Mechanical Properties of Recycled EPS Concrete, Int. J. Eng. Technol. Comput. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 01–07, (2020). Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342424798_MECHANICAL_PROPERTIES_OF_RECYCLED_EPS_CONCRETE [Google Scholar]
  7. A. S. Moon, L. S. Selokar, A. I. Patle, D. S. Bhoyar, S. D. Kowale, and S. S. Quaz, Light Weight Concrete by using EPS Beads, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 7, (2020). Available: http://www.irjet.net [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Vakhshouri and S. Nejadi, Review on the mixture design and mechanical properties of the lightweight concrete containing expanded polystyrene beads, Aust. J. Struct. Eng., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–23, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2017.1353330 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Associazione Italiana Polistirene Espanso (AIPE), Vol. 6 - EPS : Impatto Ambientale e ciclo di vita, Aipe, vol. 6, pp. 1–83, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Hart, K. Adams, J. Giesekam, D. D. Tingley, and F. Pomponi, Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment, Procedia CIRP, vol. 80, pp. 619–624, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Zairul, M. Z. Bin Mohd Noor, and M. Zairul, flexZhouse: New business model for affordable housing in Malaysia, A+ BE Archit. built Environ., (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. P. O. ‘t Veld, MORE-CONNECT: Development and Advanced Prefabrication of Innovative, Multifunctional Building Envelope Elements for Modular Retrofitting and Smart Connections, Energy Procedia, vol. 78, pp. 1057–1062, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.026 [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Saretta, P. Caputo, and F. Frontini, A review study about energy renovation of building facades with BIPV in urban environment, Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 44, pp. 343–355, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE), Driving transformational change in the construction value chain, (2016). Available: https://www.bpie.eu/publication/construction-value-chain/ [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Cavalliere, G. R. Dell’Osso, F. Favia, and M. Lovicario, BIM-based assessment metrics for the functional flexibility of building designs, Autom. Constr., vol. 107, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102925 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Jin, H. Yuan, and Q. Chen, Science mapping approach to assisting the review of construction and demolition waste management research published between 2009 and 2018, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 140, pp. 175–188, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.029 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Munaro, Mayara Regina Sérgio Fernando and L. Bragança, Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 260, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Mangialardo and E. Micelli, Innovation of Off-Site Constructions: Benefits for Developers and the Community in an Italian Case Study, in Values and Functions for Future Cities, Values and., F. Mondini, G., Oppio, A., Stanghellini, S., Bottero, M., Abastante, Ed. Springer, Cham, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23786-8_12 [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Martinelli, F. Fatiguso, and F. Fiorito, European building stock assessment and the challenge of renovation, in Colloqui.AT.e 2022 – Memoria e Innovazione, pp. 1053–1067, (2022). Available: https://iris.poliba.it/handle/11589/243424 [Google Scholar]
  20. Comitato Termotecnico Italiano (CTI), Blocks for floor systems insulation formwork made with Expanded polystyrene (EPS) UNI 11829, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  21. Comitato Termotecnico Italiano (CTI), Thermal insulation products for buildings. Factory made expanded polystyrene (EPS) products – Specification UNI EN 13163, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Stüttgen, R. Akpanya, B. Beckmann, R. Chudoba, D. Robertz, and A. C. Niemeyer, Modular Construction of Topological Interlocking Blocks—An Algebraic Approach for Resource-Efficient Carbon-Reinforced Concrete Structures, Buildings, vol. 13, no. 10, (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102565 [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Araújo, D. Cabiddu, M. Attene, M. Livesu, N. Vining, and A. Sheffer, Surface2Volume: Surface segmentation conforming assemblable volumetric partition, ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 38, no. 4, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3323004 [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Fernando, S. Weir, D. Reinhardt, and A. Hannouch, Towards a multi-criteria framework for stereotomy – Workflows for subtractive fabrication in complex geometries, J. Comput. Des. Eng., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 468–478, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2018.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Sassu, A. De Falco, L. Giresini, and M. L. Puppio, Structural solutions for low-cost bamboo frames: Experimental tests and constructive assessments, Materials (Basel)., vol. 9, no. 5, (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9050346 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Mousavian, K. Bagi, and C. Casapulla, Interlocking joint shape optimization for structurally informed design of block assemblages, J. Comput. Des. Eng., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1279–1297, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwac054 [Google Scholar]
  27. A. V. Dyskin, Y. Estrin, A. J. Kanel-Belov, and E. Pasternak, A new concept in design of materials and structures: Assemblies of interlocked tetrahedron-shaped elements, Scr. Mater., vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2689–2694, (2001). doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00968-X [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Estrin, A. V. Dyskin, and E. Pasternak, Topological interlocking as a material design concept, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1189–1194, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.11.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Mousavian and C. Casapulla, Assemblability Constraints in the Limit Analysis of 3D Masonry Interlocking Blocks, no. October, (2021). doi: 10.23967/sahc.2021.031 [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Mirkhalaf, T. Zhou, and F. Barthelat, Simultaneous improvements of strength and toughness in topologically interlocked ceramics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 115, no. 37, pp. 9128–9133, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807272115 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. V. Dyskin, Y. Estrin, and E. Pasternak, Topological interlocking materials, Springer Ser. Mater. Sci., vol. 282, no. April, pp. 23–49, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11942-3_2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Associazione Italiana Polistirene Espanso (AIPE), Vol. 12 - Riciclare l’EPS, vol. 12, (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.