Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 10
Section Mortar Properties
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440302005
Published online 16 September 2024
  1. R. J. Ball, G. C. Allen, M. A. Carter, M. A. Wilson, C. Ince, and A. El-Turki, ‘The application of electrical resistance measurements to water transport in lime-masonry systems’, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 669–677, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Diogo and P. Figueiredo, ‘Properties and performance of lime mortars for conservation : the role of binder chemistry and curing regime’, University of Bath, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Wiggins, ‘Traditional Lime Mortars and Masonry Preservation’, J. Build. Limes Forum, vol. 24, pp. 28–37, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. El-Turki, R. J. Ball, and G. C. Allen, ‘The influence of relative humidity on structural and chemical changes during carbonation of hydraulic lime’, Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1233–1240, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Copsey, ‘Like-for-like and compatible mortars for the repair of traditional buildings’, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. - ISPRS Arch., vol. 54, no. M–1, pp. 1017–1024, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. B. Su-Cadirci, J. Calabria-Holley, C. Ince, and R. J. Ball, ‘Freeze-thaw resistance of pozzolanic hydrated lime mortars’, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 394, no. June, p. 131993, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. B. Rogers, ‘Evaluation and Testing of Brick Dust as a Pozzolanic Additive to Lime Mortars for Architectural Conservation’, University of Pennsylvania, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. British Standards Institution, ‘BS EN 197-1 Cement Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements’, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  9. British Standards Institution, ‘BS EN 13687-1:2002, Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures – Test methods – Determination of thermal compatibility Part 2: Thunder-shower cycling (thermal shock)’, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. F. M. Geraldes, A. M. Lima, J. Delgado-Rodrigues, J. M. Mimoso, and S. R. M. Pereira, ‘Geopolymers as potential repair material in tiles conservation’, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., 2016. [Google Scholar]
  11. British Standards Institution, ‘BS EN 1015-3: 1999 Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry, Part 3: Determination of consistence of fresh mortar (by flow table)’, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. British Standards Institution, ‘BS EN 1015-11 Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry, Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar’, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. CEYLAN, ‘Isparta Tüfünün Puzolanik Özelliklerinin Araştırılması’, Tek. Bilim. Derg., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. ASTM, ‘ASTM C618-12a’, 2014. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.