Open Access
Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02004 | |
Number of page(s) | 22 | |
Section | Mortar Properties | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440302004 | |
Published online | 16 September 2024 |
- Szemerey-Kiss, B., Török, Á. The effects of the different curing conditions and the role of added aggregate in the strength of repair mortars. Environ Earth Sci 76, 284 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6597-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Mukhtar, Muzahim & Beck, Kévin. (2006). Physical-mechanical characterization of hydraulic and non-hydraulic lime based mortars for a French porous limestone. Proceedings of the International Conference on Heritage, Weathering and Conservation, HWC 2006. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Barbero-Barrera, M. del M., Maldonado-Ramos, L., Van Balen, K., García-Santos, A., & Neila-González, F. J. (2014). Lime render layers: An overview of their properties. Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 15, pp. 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.07.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Silva, B. A., Ferreira Pinto, A. P., & Gomes, A. (2015). Natural hydraulic lime versus cement for blended lime mortars for restoration works. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Di Bella, G., Fiore, V., Galtieri, G., Borsellino, C., & Valenza, A. (2014). Effects of natural fibres reinforcement in lime plasters (kenaf and sisal vs. Polypropylene). Construction and Building Materials, 58, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stefanidou, M., Papachristoforou, M., & Kesikidou, F. (2016). Fiber- reinforced lime mortars. 4th Historic Mortars Conference, 422–430. [Google Scholar]
- Snow, J., & Torney, C. (2014). Short guide: Lime Mortars in Traditional Buildings. (6), 16–18. Retrieved from http://conservation.historic-scotland.gov.uk/hs-short-guide-6.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Caterham Group. (2016). Fiber Reinforced Composites. Retrieved November 21, 2019, from https://altairenlighten.com/in-depth/fiber-reinforced-composites/ [Google Scholar]
- Bennett, B. (2002). Lime Plaster and Render Reinforcement. Retrieved November 21, 2019, from The Building Conservation Directory website: https://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/limehair/limehair.htm [Google Scholar]
- Olutoge, F., Ofuyatan, O., Rachael, A., & Opaluwa, E. (2015). Strength Characteristics of Concrete Reinforced With Sugar Cane Bagasse Fibre. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering Ver. III, 12(3), 2278–1684. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-12336871 [Google Scholar]
- Shahzad, A., & Nasir, S. U. (2017). Mechanical properties of natural fiber/synthetic fiber reinforced polymer hybrid composites. Green Energy and Technology, (9783319466095), 355–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46610-1_15 [Google Scholar]
- Ramakrishna, G., & Sundararajan, T. (2005). Impact strength of a few natural fibre reinforced cement mortar slabs: a comparative study. In Cement and Concrete Composites (Vol. 27, Issue 5, pp. 547–553). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Elfaleh, I., Abbassi, F., Habibi, M., Ahmad, F., Guedri, M., Nasri, M., & Garnier, C. (2023). A comprehensive review of natural fibers and their composites: An eco-friendly alternative to conventional materials. In Results in Engineering (Vol. 19, p. 101271). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101271 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sheikh Khalid, F., Herman, H. S., & Azmi, N. B. (2017). Properties of Sugarcane Fiber on the Strength of the Normal and Lightweight Concrete. In M. J. Zainorizuan, L. Yee Yong, L. Alvin John Meng Siang, O. Mohamad Hanifi, R. Siti Nazahiyah, & A. Mohd Shalahuddin (Eds.), MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 103, p. 01021). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710301021 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Abed Alameer, S. A., Mohammed Ali, M. R., Majeed, R. H., & Alyhya, W. S. (2020a). Investigating the effect of polypropylene fibre on mortar mechanical properties with the aid of microwave curing. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 671(1), 012130. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/671/1/012130 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, J. D., & Grossi, A. (2007). Indicators and ratings for the compatibility assessment of conservation actions. Indicators and ratings for the compatibility assessment of conservation actions 8 (1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2006.04.007 [Google Scholar]
- Limetec. (2020). Lime Mortar Mix Ratio. Retrieved from Limetec Website: https://www.limetec.co.uk/limetec-lime-mortar-mix-ratio.html [Google Scholar]
- Claisse, P. A. (2016). Chapter 28 - Mortars and grouts. In P. A. Claisse, Civil Engineering Materials (pp. 303-311). Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM International. (2018, April 20). ASTM C33 - Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. ASTM International. [Google Scholar]
- Indian Standards. (1992). IS:1542 Sand for plaster. India: Indian Standards. [Google Scholar]
- British Standards Institution. (2006). BS EN 1015-11:1999 Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 11: Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar. 3(1). [Google Scholar]
- European Standard. (1998). EN 1052-1 Methods of test for masonry: Determination of compressive strength. European Standard. [Google Scholar]
- Vermeltfoort, A. T. (2005). Brick-mortar interaction in masonry under compression. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Costigan, A., Pavía, S., & Kinnane, O. (2015). An experimental evaluation of prediction models for the mechanical behavior of unreinforced, lime-mortar masonry under compression. Journal of Building Engineering Vol 4, 283-294 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O’Sullivan, M. G. (2017). Instrumental Assessment of the Sensory Quality of Food and Beverage Products. In A Handbook for Sensory and Consumer-Driven New Product Development (pp. 151–175). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100352-7.00008-7 [Google Scholar]
- Govaerts, Y., Meulebroeck, W., Verdonck, A., & de Bouw, M. (2014). Measuring the colour of rendering mortars. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 9141. Brussels, Belgium: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). [Google Scholar]
- ASTM International. (2022). ASTM C20 - Standard Test Methods for Apparent Porosity, Water Absorption, Apparent Specific Gravity, and Bulk Density of Burned Refractory Brick and Shapes by Boiling Water. ASTM International. [Google Scholar]
- European Standard. (2006). EN 1936 Natural stone test methods – Determination of real density and apparent density, and of total and open porosity. European Standard. [Google Scholar]
- British Standards Institution. (2002). BS EN 1015-18:1999 Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 18 : Determination of Water Absorption Coefficient Due To Capillary Action of Hardened Mortar. [Google Scholar]
- European Standard. (2013). EN 16322 - Conservation of Cultural Heritage - Test methods - Determination of drying properties. European Standard. [Google Scholar]
- Salomao, M., Bauer, E., & Kazmierczak, C. D. (2018). Drying parameters of rendering mortars. Ambiente Construído 18(2) Tecnologia das Argamassas. [Google Scholar]
- Briccoli, B., & Rovero, L. (1997). Gli additivi per malte usati nell’antichità. Materiali e tecniche per il Restauro Cassino. [Google Scholar]
- Moropoulou, A. & Bakolas, Asterios & Moundoulas, P. & Aggelakopoulou, Eleni & Anagnostopoulou, Sophia. (2005). Strength development and lime reaction in mortars for repairing historic masonries. Cement and Concrete Composites. 27. 289-294. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.